Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

PENYULUHAN HUKUM MENGENAI HUKUMAN MATI DI KABUPATEN HALMAHERA TIMUR, PROPINSI MALUKU UTARA Nardiman, Nardiman
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat AbdiMas Vol 8, No 01 (2021): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Abdimas
Publisher : Universitas Esa Unggul

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47007/abd.v8i01.4787

Abstract

East Halmahera Regency, which is located in North Maluku Province, is a splintering area from Maluku Province in 1999. East Halmahera Regency is inhabited by the Tagutil tribe. People in East Halmahera, some of the people live from farming and hunting in the forest.  In March 2019, the defendant Habel Lilinger alias Hambiki or Niklas Dilingar and his friends (as many as 6 people) were tortured and murdered against the victims, namely Harun Muharam, Halim Difa, Yusuf Halim, Karim Abdul Rahman and Habibu Salatun, which resulted in Yusuf Halim, Karim Abdul Rahman and Habibu Salaton died, while Halim Difa and Must Muharam suffered wounds. Persecution and murder were carried out in very, cruel, sadistic, cruel and inhuman ways, namely by repeatedly throwing river stones, shooting at the victim, stabbing with a spear, cutting or slashing the victim using a machete on the victim's hand, body and face repeatedly. , so that the victim's face is crushed and difficult to recognize, even though the victim is already in a helpless state. There is a need for legal counseling to citizens in East Halmahera, so as not to do eigenrichting which results in the death of victims and injuries, especially as our country as a rule of law, all problems in society must be resolved according to law. If the victims and the defendants did not know each other, it was only because of a moment's emotion which had fatal consequences. Between the victims and the defendants were still residents of East Halmahera district, only different villages, the defendants were from Dodaga village, while the victims were from Waci village.  Keywords : Legal counseling, death penalty, East Halmahera Regency 
Tinjauan Yuridis dalam Perkara Pidana Money Laundering Randi Fryandika; Markoni Markoni; Nardiman Nardiman; Joko Widarto
Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Vol 12 No 3 (2023): Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gresik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Undang-undang Nomor 8 tahun 2010 tentang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (TPPU) merupakan salah satu pedoman penting bagi penegakkan hukum atas TPPU. Namun, Undang-undang ini mendapat sorotan terutama Pasal 69 terkait diadili secara bersamaan atau tidaknya tindak pidana asal sebelum terjadinya TPPU sehingga membuat Undang-undang ini patut dipertanyakan kepastian dan keadilan hukumnya. Di sisi lain, pada praktiknya masih terdapat putusan hakim yang mengedepankan teori kepastian hukum dengan memastikan pelaku diadili sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku atas setiap perbuatannya baik itu TPPU maupun tindak pidana asalnya, salah satunya Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bekasi Nomor 741/Pid.B//2014/PN.Bks. Hakim pada putusan ini juga mengedepankan teori keadilan hukum dengan mendakwa pelaku sesuai dengan setiap perbuatannya yang mengarah pada pelanggaran terhadap hukum pidana seperti menyalahgunakan jabatan dan korupsi. Pada kasus ini, hakim sangat mengedepankan prinsip efisiensi dalam peradilan dengan tetap dibuktikannya tindak pidana asal dalam proses peradilan TPPU. Bagaimanapun, demi efektivitas penegakkan terhadap hukum TPPU dan demi menghindari terjadinya perbedaan putusan pengadilan, sebaiknya TPPU digabung dengan tindak pidana asalnya. Selain yang demikian menjamin prinsip speed administration dan efisiensi peradilan, juga lebih memberi kepastian dan perlindungan hak asasi terhadap subjek hukum yang diduga melakukan TPPU maupun pihak yang menjadi korban atas TPPU.
Kebijakan Yudikatif untuk Mengatasi Disparitas Pidana dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Dikaitkan dengan Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim Antoni, Agus; Helvis, Helvis; Nardiman, Nardiman; Kartika, I Made
Social Science Academic Vol 2 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/ssa.v2i2.5869

Abstract

Korupsi di Indonesia terjadi secara sistimatis dan berkembang ke hampir seluruh daerah di Indonesia baik di sektor pemerintahan maupun sector swasta (perusahaan). Hal ini tentu merugikan, sehingga sebagai bentuk upaya pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi maka pemerintah membentuk Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) sebagai lembaga negara independent berdasarkan amanat dari Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 yang kemudian diwujudkan melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 30 tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang mengatur secara khusus tentang KPK kemudian disempurnakan kembali dan terbitlah Undang-Undang Nomor 19 tahun 2019. Dalam penerapan asas kebebasan hakim, sudah seharusnya hakim mempunyai persepsi yang sama tentang menerapkan aturan hukum sehingga mengurangi terjadinya disparitas putusan. Selain itu, menerbitkan suatu pedoman dalam penjatuhan tindak pidana juga dibutuhkan untuk menyelaraskan pandangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan vonis perkara korupsi. Dengan adanya keseragaman pola pikir di dalam penjatuhan vonis perkara korupsi maka diharapkan tidak terjadi lagi adanya disparitas pemidanaan yang berujung kepada ketidakpuasan masyarakat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normative dan bertujuan untuk mengetahui tentang kaitannya asas kebebasan hakim dalam menyelesaikan perkara pidana serta bagaimana penerapan PERMA 1/2020 sebagai salah satu Langkah dalam mengurangi disparitas putusan pemidanaan.
Comparative Legal Analysis of The Death Penalty Provisions In Indonesia: The State Of Pancasila Law's Perspective (Case Study of Law Numbers 1 Of 1946 And Law Number 1 of 2023 Concerning The Criminal Code) Kurniawan, Kurniawan; Kantikha, I Made; Markoni, Markoni; Nardiman, Nardiman
Jurnal Legisci Vol 1 No 6 (2024): Vol 1 No 6 June 2024
Publisher : Ann Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62885/legisci.v1i6.312

Abstract

The death penalty is one tool used by law enforcement to deal with significant crimes. Its purpose is to deter criminals from committing similar crimes in the future and to make those who have not engaged them feel fearful of doing so. Following the reforms, the Republic of Indonesia's legal politics evolved into one that supports democracy. The surface issues concern how the death sentence laws are seen from the standpoint of the Pancasila legal state. This study aims to compare regulatory policies regarding the death penalty from the perspective of Pancasila's legal system. Normative juridical research is the analytical tool employed to explore this issue. The findings of this study, specifically the death penalty clauses included in Law Number 1 of 1946 and Law Number 1 of 2023 governing the Criminal Code, contain many different things that were initially the basic criminal death penalty, which were changed to special criminal penalties. There are also several relationships and comparisons between certain crimes because the principle of legality is still in effect. In the Indonesian context, the view of life is Pancasila, a joint agreement or consensus between the majority of the Indonesian nation.
Legal Analysis of The Enforcement of Article 18 of The Regulation Issued by The Director General of Taxes, Numbered PER-03/PJ/2022, Regarding Tax Invoices Ban Hin, Siaw; Markoni; Nardiman; Widarto, Joko
Jurnal Legisci Vol 2 No 1 (2024): Vol 2 No 1 August 2024
Publisher : Ann Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62885/legisci.v2i1.408

Abstract

The Republic of Indonesia implemented Law Number 12 of 2011, explicitly establishing rules and regulations. Law Number 13 of 2022 has since revised this law. This Law enhances the current legislation, precisely Law Number 10 of 2004. Law Number 12 of 2011 prescribes the procedure for enacting laws and establishes guidelines for resolving conflicts or inconsistencies between these laws and regulations. The objective of this study is to analyze the legal effectiveness of Article 18 of Regulation PER-03/PJ/2022, which was issued by the Director General of Taxes, to Law Number 7 of 2021 on the Harmonization of Tax Regulations and Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. This research methodology entails examining values, norms, and written regulations, establishing a solid connection to the normative legal aspects of the library. The research has determined that the Regulation of the Director General of Taxes Number Per-03/PJ/2022 regulates Tax Invoices and has exceeded its authority in issuing Tax Invoices. The aforementioned rule pertains to the regulatory framework established by the Minister of Finance, which governs this particular matter and confers jurisdiction upon the director general of taxation. The Regulation of the Director General of Taxes Number 03/PJ/2022, which concerns Tax Invoices, does not possess enforceable legal authority and is open to scrutiny by the Supreme Court. Legal certainty is paramount as it provides taxpayers with a lucid and all-encompassing comprehension of their rights and obligations.
Handling Anarchist Demonstrations That Are Harmful to the Community Based on Police Standard Operating Procedures in the Jurisdiction of Polda Metro Jaya Sihombing, Jasalmon; Markoni; Kantikha, I Made; Nardiman
International Journal of Science and Society Vol 7 No 1 (2025): International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC)
Publisher : GoAcademica Research & Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/ijsoc.v7i1.1381

Abstract

Demonstrations, as a form of freedom of expression, often present challenges for security forces, especially when such actions escalate into anarchic behavior that harms the public. In the legal jurisdiction of the Metro Jaya Police, this issue has become a significant concern due to the high frequency of demonstrations in the capital city. This study aims to analyze the Police's Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) in dealing with anarchic demonstrators within the jurisdiction of the Metro Jaya Police. The theories used in this research are law enforcement theory and legal protection theory, employing a normative juridical research method. The results of the study show that the implementation of the Police SOP, which includes stages of prevention, crowd control, and evaluation, plays a significant role in addressing anarchic actions. Challenges such as limited coordination with the organizers, limited resources, and difficulties in maintaining transparency and accountability were identified. In conclusion, the Police SOP at the Metro Jaya Police is designed to handle anarchic demonstrations in a structured, professional, and legal manner, with stages from prevention to the use of measured force, prioritizing transparency, accountability, and the protection of human rights.
Authority of Judicial Bodies in Settling Tax Disputes in Indonesia Gojali, Akhmad; Kantikha, I Made; Markoni; Nardiman
International Journal of Science and Society Vol 7 No 1 (2025): International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC)
Publisher : GoAcademica Research & Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/ijsoc.v7i1.1382

Abstract

Tax is the main source of state revenue. Since 1984, tax collection in Indonesia has adopted a self-assessment system. In the practice of tax collection, disputes often occur between the Tax Authorities and Taxpayers regarding differences in the calculation of tax payable. The judicial body authorized to handle tax disputes in addition to the Tax Court, can also be resolved in other courts. The problems that arise are what causes tax disputes and how is the authority of the judicial body in resolving tax disputes. This study aims to analyze the authority of the judicial body in resolving tax disputes using the normative legal method. The results of the study show that tax disputes occur because there are differences of opinion between Taxpayers and the Tax Authorities in a legal and/or evidentiary manner. The Tax Court is only authorized to resolve disputes over Tax Authorities' Decisions and tax collections that can be appealed/lawsuited. Tax disputes related to Tax Authorities' Decisions that are detrimental to Taxpayers that are not specifically regulated are resolved in the State Administrative Court, while tax collection disputes in the form of hostage-taking of Taxpayers and third-party goods that are confiscated are the authority of the District Court. In conclusion, the authority to resolve tax disputes is not only resolved in the Tax Court, but also has the authority of the State Administrative Court and the District Court.
Police Discretion in Investigating Document Forgery and False Information Cases in Indonesia Putra, Ichwan Fuad Chaerul; Markoni; Nardiman; Asri, Dyah Permata Budi
International Journal of Science and Society Vol 7 No 1 (2025): International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC)
Publisher : GoAcademica Research & Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/ijsoc.v7i1.1396

Abstract

Discretion is a form of authority granted to law enforcement officers, including police investigators, to make decisions based on specific judgments to ensure the smooth progression of legal processes. The purpose of this study is to analyze the process of investigation, inquiry, and the determination of suspects in cases of document forgery. The theories utilized in this thesis research include the theory of investigation, the theory of law enforcement, and the theory of discretion. This research employs a normative juridical method, a legal research approach used to analyze and evaluate applicable legal norms and their application in practice. The findings indicate that in cases of document forgery, original evidence must be presented to investigators for subsequent seizure as valid evidence in proving the criminal act of document forgery. Photocopy evidence alone, unsupported by other evidence, is deemed inadmissible. In conclusion, the discretion applied in the investigation process and suspect determination is expected to align with legal principles. Excessive or improper use of discretion can lead to abuse of authority, ultimately undermining public trust in law enforcement institutions.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana yang Dilakukan oleh Orang dengan Gangguan Jiwa Rachman, Novita Ayu Nafisa; Sembiring, Malemna Sura Anabertha; Nardiman; I Made Kanthika
Journal Scientific of Mandalika (JSM) e-ISSN 2745-5955 | p-ISSN 2809-0543 Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/10.36312/vol6iss3pp722-731

Abstract

The cause of the weak legal protection of victims of criminal acts in Indonesia is that the laws and regulations governing it are still unclear. In this research, the author will discuss issues related to the legal protection of victims of criminal acts committed by people with mental disorders (ODGJ) and efforts that can be made by victims of criminal acts committed by ODGJ to obtain compensation. The normative research method used by the author in discussing the case in this thesis refers to written regulations, data collection is done through literature study as well as examining laws and cases related to the legal protection of victims of criminal acts committed by ODGJ. From the results of the research, it can be concluded that the legal protection of victims of criminal acts in the justice system must be pursued by the state as a form of responsibility for the formulation of criminal legislation. Legal protection of victims of crimes committed by ODGJ can be done with compensation in the form of restitution as an additional punishment to fulfill the rights of victims that have not been obtained. Criminal law policy is expected to be able to provide firmer rules regarding compensation that can be systematically applied in criminal law policy.
The Legal Protection for Doctors Regarding Medical Consent for Additional Medical Procedures Inggas, Made Agus Mahendra; Markoni, Markoni; Kantikha, I Made; Nardiman, Nardiman
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Journal Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v4i3.1072

Abstract

Informed Consent is a prerequisite before a medical procedure can be considered legally valid and provide legal protection. Additional medical procedures can raise ethical, medical, and legal issues. There is no specific legislation focusing on legal protection for doctors regarding these additional medical procedures, but general principles of Indonesian law provide room for doctors to defend themselves if they have served patients professionally in accordance with professional standards and professional ethics. The research aims to analyze the procedures for obtaining consent for additional medical procedures and the legal protection for doctors providing these services to patients. The research method is conducted using a normative juridical approach with conceptual and case approach. The research results indicate that the purpose of obtaining consent for medical procedures is to protect patients from medical procedures performed without their knowledge and to provide legal protection for doctors from unforeseen and negative consequences. In the case of additional medical procedures, there must be renewed consent, and the procedure for obtaining consent depends on the availability of family members, either during or after the procedure. Doctors must comply with all medical standards and maintain complete medical records. In conclusion, the procedure for obtaining consent for additional medical procedures should be conducted during the procedure if family members are present or after the procedure if family members are absent, and legal protection for doctors in additional medical procedures is ensured through renewed written consent, maintaining complete medical records, and adhering to professional standards.