Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

The Effectiveness of Law Enforcement Volunteers in Prosecuting Sharia Violations: A Study of the Role of Muḥtasib and Pageu Gampong in Banda Aceh Mizaj Iskandar Usman; Abdul Jalil Salam; Muliadi Muliadi; Nurdin MH; Amrizal J. Prang
Mazahib Vol. 25 No. 1 (2026): VOLUME 25, ISSUE 1, 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Sultan Aji Muhamamd Idris Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/mj.v25i1.12503

Abstract

This study aims to explain the roles of the muḥtasib and pageu gampong in enforcing sharia law in Banda Aceh, as well as their respective effectiveness. The study is important because the extensive area covered by sharia law enforcement creates gaps in supervision and enforcement that formal authorities have not yet fully addressed. The research questions focus on the similarities and differences in the authority of these two institutions, and the factors that influence their effectiveness. The study employs a qualitative legal-sociological approach by analyzing institutional practices at the gampong level. The results suggest that muḥtasib and pageu gampong have similar roles involving monitoring, admonishing, and reporting violations of sharia law. However, muḥtasib is limited to these three functions, whereas the pageu gampong also has the authority to resolve customary disputes, particularly minor criminal and civil cases. Pageu gampong is more effective in terms of performance because it stems from the community's collective consciousness, is self-reliant and voluntary, and has a broader membership. Nevertheless, it is not yet widespread, with only twelve villages in Banda Aceh currently having an active pageu gampong.
Hukum Adat Aceh dan Perlindungan Anak: Penyelesaian Kasus Kekerasan di Gampong Deah Raya Banda Aceh Amanda, Reni Yuvita; Iskandar, Mizaj; Adnan, Boihaqi
Jarima: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Pidana Islam Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Jarima: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Pidana Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Pidana Islam, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/jarima.v1i2.767

Abstract

Penyelesaian kasus kekeraan terhadap anak melalui mekanisme adat di Aceh mencerminkan adanya kearifan lokal yang hidup berdampingan dengan sistem hukum nasional dan hukum Islam. Penelitian ini berangkat dari kasus pemukulan terhadap anak di Gampong Deah Raya, Syiah Kuala, Kota Banda Aceh, yang diselesaikan melalui peradilan adat, dan bertujuan untuk mengkaji mekanisme penyelesaiannya serta meninjaunya dari perspektif hukum pidana Islam. Masalah yang diteliti adalah bagaimana mekanisme penyelesaian kasus pemukulan terhadap anak secara adat di Gampong Deah Raya, dan bagaimana pandangan hukum pidana Islam terhadap mekanisme tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menemukan mekanisme penyelesaian kasus kekerasan di Gampong Deah Banda Aceh dilakukan melalui beberapa tahapan; pelaporan ke kepala dusun, musyawarah oleh keuchik bersama tokoh adat, pengambilan keputusan berdasarkan mufakat. Mekanisme ini bertujuan untuk menciptakan perdamaian dan menjaga hubungan sosial. Dari perspektif hukum pidana Islam, pendekatan ini sejalan dengan prinsip iṣlāḥ (perdamaian) dan diyat (kompensasi), selama tidak melanggar prinsip keadilan dan perlindungan terhadap anak. 
International Lawfare and Transactional Peacemaking: Indonesia’s ‘Board of Peace’ and the Question of Palestinian Sovereignty Chairul Fahmi; Muhammad Siddiq Armia; Mizaj Iskandar; Laila Muhammad Rasyid; Faisal Fauzan
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 2 (2026): August
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i2.33636

Abstract

The Board for Peace (BoP), established by President Trump, is integral to the execution of the America-First and transactional strategy. This board indicates a transition in international collaboration from multilateralism under the UN mandate to a multi-corporate framework for handling the post-conflict transition in Gaza. This article analyses the legitimacy of the BoP under international law and the ramifications of Indonesia's permanent membership and its allocation of one billion US dollars to the BoP, while also evaluating its implications for Palestinian sovereignty and the international legal system. This research utilizes an interdisciplinary approach that combines international law, political economy, and international relations. The research indicates that the creation of the BoP was prompted by UN Security Council Resolution 2803, although it has diverged from the resolution's aims. Moreover, the BoP has invalidated the 2024 Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) about the Palestinian people's right to self-determination. Moreover, the BoP, which possesses a comprehensive strategy for Gaza's reconstruction post-Israel's devastation, represents an infringement on the rights of the Palestinian populace in Gaza, undermines Palestinian sovereignty, overlooks the Palestinian Authority, and imposes a fiscal obligation on nations, especially permanent members like Indonesia. This paper asserts that the BoP framework is designed exclusively to sustain informal imperialism that advantages Israel, hinders the two-state solution, and constrains Indonesia’s foreign policy—ideally independent and proactive—under the influence of U.S. interests during the Trump administration.
The Effectiveness of Cash Waqf Regulation in Banda Aceh, Indonesia: Examining Local People’s Perspectives Dhilla Fadhilla; Mizaj Iskandar; Husni bin Abdul Jalil
JURISTA: Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): JURISTA: Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Centre for Adat and Legal Studies of Aceh Province (CeFALSAP)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/jurista.v9i1.232

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is to examine the community's opinions about cash waqf, its regulations, and its rules in relation to fiqh. One option available to Muslims in Banda Aceh City for allocating funds for worship is cash waqf. On a practical level, however, society is still unaware that cash waqf exists, and academics continue to hold differing views at the fiqh level. This is why a legislative method and a conceptual approach were used in the writing of this study. According to the study's findings, one type of transportable waqf is cash waqf. Classical and modern academics continue to disagree on the constitutionality of the legislation from a fiqh standpoint. The Waqf Law, Government Regulations Implementing the Waqf Law, Minister of Religious Affairs Regulations, and BWI Regulations are among the legal provisions in Indonesia that have made cash waqf acceptable. When it comes to Aceh, Qanun Baitul Mal is where monetary waqf is managed. In reality, certain Acehnese citizens, particularly those in Banda Aceh City, are aware of the cash waqf regulations, while others are not yet aware of them. Although Banda Aceh City residents are generally lenient and accept financial waqf, socialization initiatives by associated organizations are thought to be underutilized. Therefore, there must be a concerted effort to maximize community socialization and cash waqf product branding. Cash waqf requires a particular rule in the form of a qanun, which is an extension of the current Qanun Baitul Mal.