Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN MATERNITY BELT TERHADAP PENURUNAN DERAJAT NYERI PUNGGUNG PADA IBU HAMIL TRIMESTER II Fathi, Muhammad; Sisybania, Sisybania; Akbar, Muh Syaiful
Medical Journal of Nusantara Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Medical Journal of Nusantara (MJN)
Publisher : Tahta Media Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55080/mjn.v3i1.591

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy begins at conception and lasts until childbirth. During this period, pregnant women experience both psychological and physical changes that can lead to back pain. The initial cause of back pain is the forward growth of the uterus, which shifts the center of gravity of the earth towards the lower body. To help alleviate back pain in pregnant women, a maternity belt can be used to increase lumbopelvic stability by simultaneously pressing on the sacroiliac joint surface and positioning the sacroiliac joint in a specific position to enhance stability. In this research, before and after the intervention, the level of pain will be measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Objective: to determine whether the level of back pain in second-trimester pregnant women decreases after using a maternity belt. Method and Subjects: This study is a quasi-experiment with a pre-test and post-test design. Samples were chosen using purposive sampling. The research instrument used the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and was analyzed using the Wilcoxon test with SPSS. Results: The pain scale before using the maternity belt had a minimum value of 3 (mild pain), a maximum value of 6 (moderate pain) with an average of 4.44 (moderate pain), whereas the pain scale after using the maternity belt had a minimum value of 1 (mild pain), a maximum value of 2 (mild pain) with an average of 1.32 (mild pain). Conclusion: There is an effect of using a maternity belt on the reduction of the degree of pain before and after using the maternity belt by 3.12 where p=0.000 (p<0.05)
JUDICIAL PARDON: ANTARA ABUSE OF PARDON POWER DAN PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA Jayusman, Dandi; Gusnawati, Dita; Fathi, Muhammad
Justitia et Pax Vol. 40 No. 2 (2024): Justitia et Pax Volume 40 Nomor 2 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v40i2.8574

Abstract

After 78 years of being subject to the Dutch legal legacy of Wetboek van Strafrecht (WvS), on December 6, 2022, Indonesia officially separated itself from Law Number 1 of 1946. Article 51 of Law Number 1 of 2023 contains the new concept of judicial pardon, a new addition to Indonesian criminal law. This study aims to analyse the formulation of the concept of judicial pardon in Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code (KUHP) and examine indications of abuse of power by judges in the formulation of judicial pardon. This study employs a juridical-normative research method, which involves a legal review of the Law Number 1 of 2023, a conceptual approach to analyse the objectives and direction of policy, and a comparative approach to examine the formulation of judicial pardon in various countries. The study utilizes secondary data or library research. Based on the conducted discussion, it is evident that the concept of judicial pardon has been in existence for a considerable amount of time and has been implemented in various countries. We should guide Indonesia's adoption of the judicial pardon concept by studying its formulation in various other countries. Law Number 1 of 2023 formulation of the concept of judicial pardon is still considered incomplete, ambiguous, multi-interpretable, and susceptible to legal abuse. As a result, the concept of judicial pardon can potentially be misused by judges who have personal interests, resulting in abuse of pardon power, particularly in corruption cases.
Analyzing MT Arman 11 Case: Dispute Settlement in Seizure of Ship's Action under International Law Gunawan, Yordan; Fathi, Muhammad; Ghiffara, Mustafad
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024): April
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2024.14.1.61-85

Abstract

On October 7, 2023, the Indonesian Coast Guard's recent seizure of the Iranian-flagged MT Arman 114 vessel has highlighted the legal complexities involved in enforcing maritime security in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). This article examined the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982 as the main legal framework regulating such occurrences. Flag state sovereignty typically regulates vessels, but UNCLOS 1982 grants coastal states such as Indonesia the authority to deal with infringements occurring within their Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs), such as illicit oil transfers and actions that pose a threat to national security. The article explored Part XV of UNCLOS 1982, which elucidated the many systems for resolving disputes, ranging from voluntary ways to obligatory procedures, including esteemed organizations such as the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The author therefore uses normative legal research methods to highlight the importance of strong legal structures such as UNCLOS 1982 in facing impending maritime security difficulties in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), encouraging collaboration and non-violent resolution of complex issues such as ship seizures. The results show that, in the situation of the seizure of MT Arman 114, depending on the alleged violations and the outcome of negotiations between Indonesia and Iran, it may be appropriate to use UNCLOS 1982 dispute resolution procedures, such as ITLOS or ICJ, to achieve justice. and valid international decisions.