Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

ANALISIS IMPLEMENTASI PERMOHONAN HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH YANG MASIH BERSTATUS LETTER C : (Studi Kasus Di Kantor Notaris Ismaryani, S.H., M.Kn. Notaris Di Kabupaten Sidoarjo) Saputro, Hadi; Haniyah, Haniyah
Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.572349/civilia.v3i1.1701

Abstract

Permohonan pendaftaran sertifikat hak milik atas tanah masih berstatus Letter C diperlukan waktu sangat lama karena terkendala oleh faktor antaranya datang dari masyarakat, contoh, Pemilik tanah seringkali tidak dapat mengidentifikasi dengan jelas garis properti mereka sebelum kunjungan petugas pengukur dari BPN, sehingga petugas tidak dapat secara akurat menentukan batas-batas tanah yang bersangkutan. Potensi batu sandungan lainnya adalah ketidaklengkapan informasi yang diberikan dalam permohonan, baik karakteristik fisik tanah maupun karakteristik hukumnya. Belum selesainya pungutan pungutan kas negara merupakan akibat dari kurangnya pengetahuan, yang berdampak tidak langsung pada rakyat biasa. Waktu dan uang yang diperlukan untuk mendaftarkan hak milik juga dianggap besar. Karena itu, hanya sedikit orang yang pergi ke Kantor Pertanahan untuk meminta sertipikat. Beberapa orang juga percaya bahwa sertifikat memiliki bobot yang sama dengan alat bukti lainnya, termasuk struk pajak, SPPT, struk jual beli, dan sebagainya. Adanya perselisihan sehingga menyebabkan terjadinya sengketa dari tanah yang dimohon.
Child Bullying Crimes (Islamic Perpective) Haniyah, Haniyah
Proceedings of Annual Conference for Muslim Scholars Vol 3 No 1 (2019): AnCoMS 2019
Publisher : Koordinatorat Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Swasta Wilayah IV Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (190.575 KB) | DOI: 10.36835/ancoms.v3i1.294

Abstract

Bullying crime is a crime against humanity, it is a violation of human rights, a crime of bullying is an action taken because of an imbalance in the strength of the victim there are four elements in the crime of bullying, an element of power imbalance, imbalance to hurt (desire to heart), an existence threat, terror. There are several factors that cause children to commit bullying crimes including the influence of internal factors and extraterrestrial factors. In the view of Islam, bullying is an act that is prohibited by religion, because it contains elements of humiliating other people, and makes them feel wronged, children as perpetrators of bullying according to the child protection law and the juvenile justice system can be used. criminal sanctity as adults, Islam itself is very concerned about children, the rights of children in detail in Islam, so it is impossible for children who get a good education from parents, according to Islamic teachings are able to commit crimes, for that in Islam's view a child who commits a crime bullying cannot be sanctioned until they are of age
Konsep dan Implementasi Moderasi Beragama dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia Haniyah, Haniyah
Proceedings of Annual Conference for Muslim Scholars Vol 6 No 1 (2022): AnCoMS, APRIL 2022
Publisher : Koordinatorat Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Swasta Wilayah IV Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36835/ancoms.v6i1.423

Abstract

The Indonesian nation has the motto bhineka tunggal ika, different but still one, a country that has religious diversity, ethnicity, skin color, and language. With the uniqueness and specialty of the Indonesian nation as plural and sovereign nation, the value of the unity of the Republic of Indonesia, must be instilled in every citizen. To maintain harmonization against existing differences, especially religious differences, it must be planted with moderate attitudes. As a country with a Muslim-majority population, tolerance must be forward so that there is no action that leads to the division of the nation. With the expectation of cases of violence that in the name of religion must immediately get attention and the concept of religious moderation is expected to be the right solution. Moderation of Beragama does not make weak in religion and the practice of religion, because religious moderation remains guided by the Qur'an and hadith, as well as recognized schools. in Indonesia. As a legal country, Indonesia has an obligation to maintain the unity of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI) state, through positive law in Indonesia. In religious moderation, believers should not extremely practice religious teachings but must always find common ground. One of the principles of religious moderation is to find common ground by embracing and protecting extreme groups, happiness, and positive laws in the world. Indonesia adopts the principle of moderation through the concept of deradicalization because basically terrorism originated from radicalization, so the deradicalization program is an effort to fight terrorism effectively. As stipulated in law No. 5 of 2018 on combating terrorism crimes, to neutralize radical understanding through the concept of deradicalization.
Konsep Restoratif Justice Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Anak Wujud Implementasi Nilai Islam dan Kearifan Lokal Haniyah, Haniyah
Proceedings of Annual Conference for Muslim Scholars Vol 8 No 1 (2024): AnCoMS, Oktober 2024
Publisher : Koordinatorat Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Swasta Wilayah IV Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36835/ancoms.v8i1.633

Abstract

The phenomenon of children as perpetrators of crimes, is increasing and in children's courts, when children commit criminal acts, the system of restorative justice applies as in criminal law, while children are valuable assets, for parents, families and the state, The purpose of the research is to find out whether the concept of restorative justice does not contradict Islamic values and local wisdom, the research is a normative research with a legal and conceptual approach, The results of the study show that the concept of restorative justice as an action that is very appropriate to be applied to child offenders, considering that children are the shoots of the nation that must be maintained as the next generation of the nation in addition to the philosophical value The concept of restorative justice has long been applied in solving every problem in the majority Muslim society in Indonesia.
Moralization and Decriminalization of Consensual Adultery Punishment from the Perspective of Islamic Criminal Law and the New Criminal Code Haniyah, Haniyah; Handayani, Budi; Samawati, Wiati
Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law and Family Studies Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Shariah UIN Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v7i2.11215

Abstract

The reformulation of morality-based criminal offenses in the New Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), particularly regarding the criminalization of consensual adultery, raises questions about the limits of state intervention in the private sphere of citizens. In contrast, Islamic criminal law considers adultery (zina) as a jarimah with strong normative and theological foundations, accompanied by strict evidentiary requirements. This study compares the criminalization of adultery in the New KUHP, particularly Articles 411 and 412, with Islamic criminal law, while examining the influence of legal politics and moral value sources on both systems. The research employs a normative legal methodology with conceptual, statutory, and comparative approaches, and analyzes primary and secondary data qualitatively through systematic and contextual reading. The findings show that the New KUHP emphasizes social morality through a complaint-based offense mechanism, limiting state intervention in private matters, while still upholding moral norms. Islamic criminal law, on the other hand, treats adultery as a violation of divine and social order, but its strict evidentiary mechanisms and the principle of dar’ al-ḥudūd bi al-shubuhāt prevent arbitrary criminalization and protect individual rights. These findings highlight the importance of balancing collective moral values, respect for private space, and legal certainty in shaping criminal policy. This study is expected to serve as a reference for national criminal law reform and to broaden cross-system understanding of the relationship between morality, individual rights, and criminalization policy.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERBUATAN MENGHILANGKAN NYAWA ORANG LAIN: ANALISIS UNSUR KESENGAJAAN DAN KEALPAAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 454/Pid.B/2024/PN.Sby) Shidiq, Amirul; Samuji, Samuji; Haniyah, Haniyah
Jurnal Education and Development Vol 13 No 3 (2025): Vol 13 No 3 September 2025
Publisher : Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37081/ed.v13i3.7792

Abstract

Perbuatan menghilangkan nyawa orang lain merupakan salah satu bentuk tindak pidana yang menuntut ketepatan dalam klasifikasi hukum, khususnya dalam membedakan antara penganiayaan yang berakibat mati dan kealpaan yang menyebabkan kematian. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji: (1) batasan yuridis perbuatan menghilangkan nyawa akibat penganiayaan dan kealpaan dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP); dan (2) penerapan Pasal 351 ayat (3) dan Pasal 359 KUHP dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor: 454/Pid.B/2024/PN.Sby yang berujung pada putusan bebas terhadap terdakwa. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara normatif, Pasal 351 ayat (3) KUHP mengatur penganiayaan yang menyebabkan kematian dengan unsur kesengajaan awal, sedangkan Pasal 359 KUHP mengatur kealpaan yang mengakibatkan kematian tanpa adanya niat. Namun dalam praktik, pembedaan antara dua tindak pidana ini tidak selalu jelas. Dalam putusan yang dianalisis, hakim memutus bebas dengan pertimbangan bahwa unsur kesengajaan maupun kelalaian berat tidak terbukti secara meyakinkan. Padahal, berdasarkan fakta persidangan, ditemukan adanya tindakan kekerasan fisik yang berpotensi memenuhi unsur penganiayaan berat. Temuan ini menunjukkan ketidakkonsistenan dalam penerapan hukum dan menimbulkan kekhawatiran terhadap efektivitas perlindungan hukum bagi korban. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan perlunya pedoman teknis bagi aparat penegak hukum dalam membedakan tindak pidana penganiayaan dan kealpaan secara lebih sistematis dan berkeadilan.