Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Educational Journal

Objektifikasi dan Kegagalan Intersubjektivitas dalam Novel “Duri dan Kutuk” Karya Cicilia Oday: Kajian Feminis Psikoanalisis Iktisah, Ensadetha; Ahmadi , Anas; Rizal, Moh. Ahsan Shohifur
Educational Journal Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): FEBRUARI-APRIL
Publisher : Indo Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/9axj7s09

Abstract

This study focuses on the doer/done-to relational pattern as represented through the relationship between the characters Adam and Eva. It reveals that this relationship demonstrates a failure to achieve intersubjectivity and thirdness, as well as how Eva’s curse is interpreted as a form of resistance and, at the same time, an expression of the failure to recognize female subjectivity within a patriarchal system. The aim of this research is to uncover forms of female objectification and the dynamics of power relations that hinder the creation of mutual recognition between men and women in literary texts. The method used is qualitative research with a psychoanalytic feminist approach based on Jessica Benjamin and a hermeneutic analysis approach based on Hans-Georg Gadamer. The data source of this research is the novel Duri dan Kutuk by Cicilia Oday, while the research data consist of narrative excerpts, dialogues, and character portrayals related to gender relations. The results show that the relationship between Adam and Eva represents a doer/done-to dominance pattern that positions Eva as an object of male desire and gaze. This relationship fails to achieve intersubjectivity due to the absence of mutual recognition of Eva as an autonomous subject. This failure also prevents the formation of thirdness as an equal relational space. Eva’s curse can be interpreted as a form of resistance to patriarchal domination, as well as an expression of the failure to acknowledge women’s subjectivity within unequal gender relations.
Hibriditas dan Ambivalensi pada Novel Kokoro Karya Natsume Souseki: Teori Poskolonial Homi K. Bhabha Pramesti, Foni; Ahmadi, Anas; Rizal, Moh. Ahsan Shohifur
Educational Journal Vol. 1 No. 4 (2026): MAY-JULY
Publisher : Indo Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/8ed7xq04

Abstract

This study aims to identify and analyze the forms of hybridity in the Kokoro by Natsume Souseki using Homi K. Bhabha’s postcolonial theory. The research employs a qualitative method with an interpretative approach, supported by Gadamer’s hermeneutic analysis to explore meanings within the text. The data consist of narrative and dialogue excerpts that reflect the dynamics of identity, which are analyzed based on three indicators of hybridity: partial presence, ambivalence of identity, and in-between space. The findings reveal that the characters experience identity struggles due to the encounter between traditional Japanese values and Western modernity during the Meiji era. These forms of hybridity demonstrate that the characters’ identities are unstable, fragmented, and continuously negotiated. In conclusion, the novel represents identity as a dynamic construction shaped through cultural interaction. This study highlights the significance of hybridity theory in translation studies and postcolonial literary analysis, and it suggests further research comparing the original and translated texts to deepen the understanding of identity transformation across cultural contexts.
Dominasi dalam Hubungan Sosial Tokoh pada Novel Naomi Karya Tanizaki Junichiro: Analisis Konflik Otoritas Perspektif Ralf Dahrendorf Pramesta, Fina; Ahmadi, Anas; Rizal, Moh. Ahsan Shohifur
Educational Journal Vol. 1 No. 4 (2026): MAY-JULY
Publisher : Indo Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/tgf9aa74

Abstract

Literary works, as representations of social reality, often portray dynamics of power relations, domination, and resistance within society. The novel Naomi by Tanizaki Junichiro is one such work that illustrates authority conflict in social relationships between characters, particularly between Joji and Naomi. This study aims to describe the forms of domination and resistance in their relationship and to explain the resulting shifts in the structure of power. This research employs a qualitative method using Ralf Dahrendorf’s theory of authority conflict as its analytical framework. The data source is the Indonesian translated version of the novel Naomi, collected through library research and a close reading-note-taking technique. The data are analyzed systematically through identification, classification, mapping, and interpretation based on the concepts of domination, subordination, resistance, and structural change. The findings reveal that initially Joji occupies a dominant position as the authority holder, while Naomi is in a subordinate position. However, as the story progresses, Naomi demonstrates various forms of resistance that eventually lead to a shift in the power structure. Ultimately, Naomi becomes the more dominant figure in the relationship. This study concludes that authority conflict not only generates tension but also drives structural changes in social relations.