Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Perkembangan Dan Karakteristik Bukti Petunjuk: Dalam Rangka Menyongsong Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Nugroho, Fiska Maulidian; Ghufron, Nurul
Acten Journal Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1: Apr 2025
Publisher : PT Matra Cendikia Abadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71087/ajlr.v2i1.26

Abstract

he Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) has established five types of evidence. However, of the five types, there is clue evidence as a type of evidence that belongs to the second degree and is indirect evidence, namely evidence that does not stand alone or indirect evidence that explains a fact in a criminal event. This clue evidence is only owned by the judge and the application of this evidence is authoritative under the subjectivity of a wise judge. The application of clue evidence is guided by Article 188 of the Criminal Procedure Code and if analysed through the characteristics of evidence, there is a problem, namely how clue evidence can be declared as clue evidence when viewed from the characteristics of criminal law evidence. Furthermore, how the Draft Criminal Procedure Code in the future on the validity of evidence of clues that are not reformulated, and replaced with evidence of the judge's own observations. The results of this study found that towards the characteristics of criminal evidentiary law on clue evidence, the evidence should be acceptable, relevant, and legally obtained. However, some incidents of the application of clue evidence show an impression that deviates from the principle of lex certa, namely the principle of clarity, especially in the application by judges. Therefore, there is a need for an evaluative activity towards clue evidence so that it does not become a norm in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code and is more appropriately replaced with evidence of judge's observation. The term judge observation is more appropriate, because this evidence is based on the idea of balance and the purpose of the law of evidence. Throughout this research, this study uses a doctrinal legal research method through a statutory approach and conceptual approach, as well as using a study of the jurisprudence of the Dutch Court and Court Decisions in Indonesia, as well as the doctrines of legal experts. Keywords : Evidence, Clues, Judge's Perception.
FUNGSIONALISASI PASAL 44 KUHP DALAM PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN (SUATU RE-ORIENTASI & RE-EVALUASI MENUJU REFORMULASI) Ohoiwutun, Y A Triana; Nugroho, Fiska Maulidian; Martua Samosir, Samuel Saut; Setiyoargo, Arief
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v5i2.3613

Abstract

Uncertainty with regard to the proper implementation of Article 44 of the Criminal Code is to be discussed.  In legal practice, the existence of mental disorder in those who are accused of murder or homicide will be made dependent on the decision of psychiatrist (authorized to conduct forensic psychology or psychiatry). In the case that such mental disorder is determined to be existing during a pre-trial hearing, the court is under no obligation to order cessation of the criminal proceeding. It is noted that in a number of cases the decision to terminate investigation or cease court proceeding falls completely under the Judge discretionary power.  The author’s recommendation is that a reformulation of Art. 44 of the Criminal Code is in order.
PERAN AHLI JIWA DALAM PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN PSIKIS DALAM RUMAH TANGGA Ohoiwutun, Y A Triana; Nugroho, Fiska Maulidian; Samsudi, Samsudi; Dewanto, Ari
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v8i1.4443

Abstract

Domestic psychic violence can be experienced by everyone, including children, wives, husbands, and others. As a material offense on domestic psychic violence, the elements resulting from psychological trauma must be proven. Therefore, the intervention of forensic psychologists and forensic psychiatrists is very important in cases of domestic psychic violence. The differences in the competence of psychologists and psychiatrists as well as the prospective roles of both professions in proving cases are the focus of the problems being studied. A normative legal research method with descriptive qualitative data analysis was employed in this research. The results showed that the existence of forensic psychologists and forensic psychiatrists is very important for finding material truths that can be scientifically tested in cases of domestic psychic violence. As evidence for letters and/or expert reports, the assessment results of forensic psychologists and forensic psychiatrists have accurate evidentiary value in forming a judge's conviction. This paper ends with a recommendation that as a form of protection for domestic violence victims, the role of psychologists and/or psychiatrists should be optimized, both in the pre-adjudication, and adjudication phases. In addition, considering the balanced position between psychologists and psychiatrists in law enforcement, this should not create jealousy and unhealthy competition between the two professions.