Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.693
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Inersia : Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Arsitektur Teknisia Teras Jurnal Jurnal Karkasa JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, BUILDING AND TRANSPORTATION Rancang Bangun Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil TAPAK (Teknologi Aplikasi Konstruksi) : Jurnal Program Studi Teknik Sipil International Journal of Engineering, Technology and Natural Sciences (IJETS) JURNAL TEKNIK SIPIL UNAYA REKAYASA DAN INOVASI TEKNIK SIPIL Jurnal Teknik Sipil
Eka Faisal Nurhidayatullah
Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mechanical Engineering Transportation

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Asesmen Kerentanan Seismik Struktur Gedung Eksisting Berdasarkan FEMA P-154 dan ASCE/SEI 41-17 Eka Faisal Nurhidayatullah; Syendi Prima Syahputra
Jurnal Teknik Sipil Unaya Vol 12 No 2 (2026): Juli 2026
Publisher : Center for Research and Community Service (LPPM) University of Abulyatama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30601/jtsu.v12i2.7814

Abstract

Most regions of Indonesia are classified as earthquake-prone areas. The education is one of the sectors most affected by earthquakes. Records of major earthquakes show that not all educational buildings have adequate seismic performance. This study aims to assess the seismic performance of an existing multi-story educational building. If structural weaknesses are identified, mitigation measures can be formulated. In this study, the structural evaluation was conducted in two stages. Stage 1 evaluation used Rapid Visual Screening (RVS) based on FEMA P-154 guidelines. Stage 2 evaluation used equivalent static and dynamic response spectrum analyses based on ASCE/SEI 41-17 and SNI 1726:2019. The Stage 1 RVS evaluation produced a score of 2.1, which is below the threshold value of 2.5, so Stage 2 evaluation was required. Based on the Stage 2 evaluation, all column elements had Demand Capacity Ratio (DCR) values below 1 (linear elastic). Only some beam elements had DCR values between 1 and 2 (linear inelastic). The projected collapse mechanism satisfied the strong column–weak beam principle. No structural weaknesses that could trigger building collapse during an earthquake were identified. Stage 3 evaluation, namely nonlinear static pushover or nonlinear dynamic time history analysis, was not recommended.
Co-Authors Adwiyah Asyifah Danang Ardiyanto Djawa, Helmy Agustin Yohanes Dwi Kurniati Dwi Kurniati Dwi Kurniati Dwi Kurniati Dwi Kurniati Fajar, Muhammad Azis Firdaus, Lutfi Mirsa Maradika, Samsul Ryandi Mochamad Teguh Muhammad Firdaus Willy Pratama Samsul A Rahman Sidik Hasibuan Saputro, Cahyo Dita Saputro, Imam Trianggoro Syendi Prima Syahputra Toni Kurniyawan Yoga Maulana Akhsan