Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

Prinsip In Absensia Dalam Pemeriksaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Due Process of Law Atapary, Adolf Erens; Pasalbessy, John Dirk; Wadjo, Hadibah Zachra
MATAKAO Corruption Law Review Vol 1 No 1 (2023): Mei 2023 MATAKAO Corruption Law Review
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Korupsi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/matakao.v1i1.9049

Abstract

Introduction: Courts in absentia in corruption have been pros and cons to date, there is an assumption that court in absentia is a violation of human rights because it is related to the human rights of the accused as a human being who has the right to defend himself in court, on the other hand The trial in absentia can be carried out as long as the whereabouts of the defendant are not known at all so that he cannot be presented at the trial trial due to running away (fugitive). Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to analyze and explain the existence of justice in absentia in the implementation of the criminal justice system in Indonesia in accordance with the principle of due process of law, to analyze and discuss the nature of the principle of due process of law in ensuring legal certainty and justice in the examination of criminal cases. Methods of the Research: Normative research method with the type of research is qualitative analysis. The problem approach used is the statute approach, the conceptual approach and the case approach. The sources of legal materials used are Primary legal materials, Secondary legal materials, and Tertiary legal materials and are used as a technique for collecting legal materials, then processing and analyzing legal materials through methods of interpretation, harmonization, systematic and legal discovery. Results of the Research: The results of the study indicate that the judiciary in absentia can be implemented and does not violate human rights as long as it is implemented through the correct procedure and based on the provisions of the law. The trial in absentia aims to break the deadlock in the examination of defendants who are not present at the trial and efforts to save state finances, both those that have been corrupted and those that are still suspected of being related to corruption cases, both those that have been confiscated and those that have not been confiscated to be confiscated for the State through a court decision.
Criminal Responsibility for Perpetrators of Pornography Crimes Usmany, Berly; Wadjo, Hadibah Zachra; Leasa, Elias Zadrach
LUTUR Law Journal Vol 6 No 1 (2025): May 2025 LUTUR Law Journal
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Diluar Kampus Utama Universitas Pattimura Kabupaten Maluku Barat Daya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/lutur.v6i1.22885

Abstract

This article analyzes the process of determining a suspect through a preliminary examination process against a perpetrator of a crime based on applicable legal regulations. Determination of a suspect as referred to, is carried out through a case title mechanism. The purpose of this writing is to examine and analyze the criminal responsibility of the perpetrators in the pornographic videos that are distributed and to analyze and analyze the judge's considerations in imposing criminal sanctions on the perpetrators of the pornographic videos that are distributed. The research method used in analyzing and discussing this research is a type of normative legal research that uses secondary legal materials as initial data to then be continued with primary legal materials or field data and tertiary legal materials that support and provide an understanding of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials over other legal materials. The legal materials that are prioritized come from literature studies, relying on scientific books such as criminal law literature, scientific magazines, and documents, then using three research approaches consisting of the Legislation approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of the study show that a person being named a suspect must go through an examination process and must have at least 2 (two) sufficient pieces of evidence to prove that a crime has indeed occurred and the person suspected of committing the crime has been supported by 2 (two) pieces of evidence that can justify the occurrence of a crime and Legal Efforts against the determination of a suspect without an examination process, namely through Pretrial Legal Efforts and Civil Legal Efforts.