Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 38 Documents
Search

Penetapan Harga Bidang Tanah pada Transaksi Jual Beli Melalui Validasi Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Karawang Gumilar, Gugum; Iriantoro, Agung
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i5.4670

Abstract

Nilai harga jual beli tanah merupakan hasil dari kesepakatan para pihak sendiri (penjual-pembeli) yang diinformasikan kepada PPAT. Tujuan penelitian aspek hukum penetapan harga bidang tanah pada transaksi jual beli dan kepastian hukum kewenangan validasi Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Karawang terhadap penetapan harga bidang tanah pada transaksi jual beli. Penelitian ini, menggunakan metode normatif (kepustakaan) dengan menganalisis data sekunder untuk mendapatkan kesimpulan tentang aspek hukum penetapan harga bidang tanah pada transaksi jual beli berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2009 tentang Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah sebagaimana telah diubah menjadi Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 tentang Hubungan Keuangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintahan Daerah dan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2000 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 1997 tentang Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah dan Bangunan (BPHTB). Kepastian hukum kewenangan validasi Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Karawang terhadap penetapan harga bidang tanah pada transaksi jual beli tidak terdapat aturan dan kebijakan yang mengatur.
TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS DALAM PENERBITAN COVERNOTE ATAS OBJEK JAMINAN YANG SAMA DENGAN DUA KREDITURYANG BERBEDA SEBAGAI JAMINAN PENCAIRAN KREDIT OLEH PIHAK BANKAIRAN KREDIT OLEH PIHAK BANK Sabila Tohari, Annisa; Agung Iriantoro
Keadilan : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tulang Bawang Vol 23 No 3 (2025): Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tulang Bawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37090/j2zg6616

Abstract

Notaris merupakan pejabat umum sekaligus pelaksana profesi hukum yang memiliki posisi  sangat penting dalam memberikan kepastian hukum bagi masyarakat yang membutuhkan alat bukti yang bersifat otentik sebagai alat bukti yang kuat, dalam hal ini yakni akta autentik. Selain penerbitan akta autentik, Notaris juga dapat mengeluarkan covernote yang merupakan surat keterangan. Covernote berisi informasi terkait sertifikat dan dokumen-dokumen yangmenjelaskan tentang akta yang sedang dibuat oleh Notaris, termasuk dalam tahapan proses dan target penyelesaiannya dalam waktu tertentu yang tercantum didalam covernote. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji tanggung jawab Notaris dalam penerbitan covernote atas objek jaminan yang sama dengan dua kreditur yang berbeda sebagai jaminan pencairan kredit oleh pihak bank. Masalah yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana kekuatan hukum dari covernote yang diterbitkan oleh Notaris dan bagaimana tanggung jawab Notaris ketika terjadi konflik akibat covernote. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, studi kasus, dan wawancara dengan pihak terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa covernote yang diterbitkan oleh Notaris memiliki kekuatan hukum yang sah dan mengikat, namun Notaris harus bertanggung jawab penuhjika terjadi kesalahan atau kelalaian dalam penerbitan covernote. Penelitian ini memberikan rekomendasi untuk menigkatkan pengawasan terhadap penerbitan covernote oleh Notaris serta memberikan sanksi tegas bagi Notaris yang melanggar. Kata Kunci: Notaris, Covernote, Objek Jaminan
THE PROBLEM OF RECOGNIZING MINANGKABAU COMMON LAND OWNERSHIP RIGHTS BETWEEN THE MATRILINEAL SYSTEM AND INDONESIAN LEGISLATION: THE PROBLEM OF RECOGNIZING MINANGKABAU COMMON LAND OWNERSHIP RIGHTS BETWEEN THE MATRILINEAL SYSTEM AND INDONESIAN LEGISLATION Chandra, Heru; Iriantoro, Agung; Teepapal, Tanawat
PENA LAW: International Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Yayasan Pusat Cendekiawan Intelektual Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56107/penalaw.v3i2.234

Abstract

The communal land ownership system of the Minangkabau indigenous legal community based on the matrilineal system faces fundamental misalignment with Indonesia's national land law regulations. This research analyzes the characteristics of ulayat land ownership system based on Minangkabau customary law and its misalignment with UUPA. The research method employs a normative juridical approach with legislative analysis and literature study. The results show that Minangkabau ulayat land ownership system has unique characteristics in the form of hereditary communal ownership through maternal lineage with separation of rights and ownership concepts in the philosophy “hak bamiliek harato bapunyo, hak nan banampuharapo nan bamiliek”. The three-tiered hierarchical structure of nagari, tribal, and clan ulayat lands is managed based on the principle of “gangam bauntuak pagang bamasiang” which does not recognize the concept of buying and selling. Misalignment occurs because UUPA adopts an individual ownership paradigm that contradicts the Minangkabau communal system. Regulation through PP 18 of 2021 which enables the transformation of ulayat land into management rights actually creates a legal certainty paradox and potentially destroys the communal ownership system. The fragmentation of ulayat land to only 8.38% remaining intact reflects the failure of legal harmonization. A reconstruction of the national agrarian law paradigm is needed that can accommodate communal ownership characteristics without eliminating the essence of indigenous cultural values.
ETHICAL AWARENESS AND ACADEMIC USE OF AI IN LEGAL AND BUSINESS WRITING AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS AT A THAI PUBLIC UNIVERSITY: ETHICAL AWARENESS AND ACADEMIC USE OF AI IN LEGAL AND BUSINESS WRITING AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS AT A THAI PUBLIC UNIVERSITY White, Alan Robert; Darodjat, Tubagus Achmad; Iriantoro, Agung
PENA LAW: International Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Yayasan Pusat Cendekiawan Intelektual Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56107/penalaw.v3i2.237

Abstract

This study examines undergraduate students’ awareness, perceptions, usage patterns, and ethical considerations regarding the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in legal and business writing. A 20-item questionnaire was administered to assess familiarity with AI tools, beliefs about their usefulness, patterns of use in academic contexts, and views on ethical implications. The results indicate moderate awareness and generally positive perceptions of generative AI, particularly in terms of improving writing quality and clarifying complex concepts. However, actual usage remains limited, and many students report a lack of formal instruction or clear guidelines on ethical use. Notably, students expressed strong support for institutional guidance and recognised the importance of responsible AI integration in academic settings. The findings underscore the need for targeted educational interventions and policy development to align student behaviour with ethical academic standards. Recommendations are made for integrating AI training into business education and conducting further research on the long-term academic effects of generative AI use.
Evaluation of the Implementation of Balance in Protecting the Rights of Entrepreneurs, and Workers in the Job Creation Law Post-the Constitutional Court Decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023: ASocio-Legal Study: Evaluation of the Implementation of Balance in Protecting the Rights of Entrepreneurs, and Workers in the Job Creation Law Post-the Constitutional Court Decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023: ASocio-Legal Study Hendriadi, Martin Triadmaja; Hamid, Adnan; Iriantoro, Agung; Komandoko, Kukuh
PENA LAW: International Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Yayasan Pusat Cendekiawan Intelektual Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56107/penalaw.v3i2.241

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the balance of protecting the rights of employers and workers in Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation instead of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation into Law or the Job Creation Law (hereinafter referred to as Law 6/2023) post-the Constitutional Court or Mahkamah Konstusi (MK) Decision No. 168/PUU-XXI/2023: a socio-legal study. Literature studies were conducted as a basis for answering various problems in this study. Then, data processing was carried out qualitatively. The results of this study indicate that Law 6/2023, after the Constitutional Court Decision, underlines the importance of normative workers' rights, which have an impact on legal certainty and benefits for workers. Law 6/2023) after the Constitutional Court Decision tends not to affect entrepreneurs. The evaluation results of the implementation of the Job Creation Law after the Constitutional Court Decision indicate that the issue of protecting employers' rights is crucial. Therefore, Law 6/2023, after the Constitutional Court Decision, is expected to be amended not only to address the imbalance in workers' rights but also the rights of employers. Thus, the results of this study are expected to be used by the government and the legislature to form employment laws and ensure fair implementation of the balance between protecting entrepreneurs.' and workers' rights in Law 6/2023 after the Constitutional Court Decision by the constitution, Article 27 paragraph (2), Article 28D paragraph (2), and Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution.
Legal Reconstruction of Employee Shareholder Protection through ESOP Program from Termination of Employment Musimin, Suyono; Iriantoro, Agung
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Spring Edition
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v13i1.46886

Abstract

Article 43, paragraph 3 of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies allows an employee to become a shareholder of the company through the ESOP (Employee Stock Option Program). In practice, an ESOP by companies is stated in a stock option agreement that outlines the rights and obligations of employees concerning the stock options. The position of employees will certainly not be exempt from the HR management policies carried out by the company, including the Termination of Employment policy. Compensation as an employee's right when Termination of Employment occurs is Severance Pay, Long Service Award Pay, Replacement of Rights, and Separation Pay if entitled only to Separation Pay. This study aims to examine and find forms of legal protection and find weaknesses in legal protection for employee shareholders (ESOP) when laid off, and to find efforts to reconstruct legal protection for employee shareholders (ESOP) when laid off. This research is normative juridical. Using secondary data as the primary source, the research was conducted through document studies via library research, employing both statistical and conceptual approaches. The results of this study are: first, that the legal provisions regarding layoffs of employees who are also shareholders of the company through ESOPs in Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021 concerning Fixed-Term Employment Agreements, Outsourcing, Working Hours and Rest Periods, and Termination of Employment have not been able to provide maximum legal protection for the rights of employees who are also shareholders. The current reality is that when ESOP employees are laid off, the company only relies on their employee status, the reason for the layoff, and the rights clearly stated in the legislation. Second, the research findings indicate that the reconstitution of Article 40 paragraph 4 letter (c) of Government Regulation 35 of 2021 aims to provide certainty and legal protection for ESOP employees in the event of layoffs by the company.
LEGAL CERTAINTY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TRANSFER FROM ANALOG CERTIFICATE MEDIA TO ELECTRONIC CERTIFICATE : LEGAL CERTAINTY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TRANSFER FROM ANALOG CERTIFICATE MEDIA TO ELECTRONIC CERTIFICATE Iriantoro, Agung
PENA LAW: International Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Yayasan Pusat Cendekiawan Intelektual Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56107/penalaw.v3i2.244

Abstract

Analog certificates have traditionally served as physical proof of land ownership and proved a sufficient degree of legal certainty. However, with advance in technology and digitalization, the government through Regulation of the Minister of Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency Number 1 of 2021, later replaced by Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency Number 3 of 2023 concerning Issuance of Electronic Documents in Land Registration Activities has sought to provide easier access to the land registration and management process. E-certificates offer easier access to land registration and management processes. Nevertheless, this regulatory shift raises legal questions regarding the status of analog and electronic certificates, as well as the broader need for regulatory harmonization. This research adopts a normative legal approach examining legal literature and secondary data (library research). The finding indicate that electronic certificates offer significant advantages, including easier access, enhanced data security, and greater transparency in registration and data management. The process of media transfer involves verification of both physical and legal data by the National Land Agency, with the Land Deed Officials playing a crucial role in ensuring the validity and legality of such data. Ultimately, digital transformation is necessary to overcome long-standing issues within the land registration system. The transition from analog certificates to electronic certificates represents a strategic step toward modernizing land administration by integrating legal and technological dimensions, thereby creating an efficient, secure, and reliable system.
TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS PEMEGANG PROTOKOL ATAS TIDAK DIBERIKANNYA SALINAN AKTA DAN MINUTA AKTA YANG TIDAK DITANDATANGANI SAKSI-SAKSI DAN NOTARIS SERTA DAMPAK HUKUMNYA TERHADAP PENGHADAP Gunawan, Hendra; Iriantoro, Agung
Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8 No 1 (2025): Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the legal responsibility of notaries of protocol holders related to the absence of copies of deeds and minutes of formally defective deeds, with a case study of Decision Number 205/Pdt.G/2023/PN Amb. Notaries of protocol holders are responsible for the deeds they hold, even though their authority is limited and cannot correct invalid deeds. Deeds that witnesses and notaries do not sign have legal weaknesses, so they are only considered deeds underhand. In this case, the notary who holds the protocol can explain to the witness or suggest the creation of a new deed. The absence of a signature on the deed impacts the validity of the document and the legal interests of the plaintiff. In addition, the District Court's decision stating that the lawsuit is inadmissible (NO) shows that there is a formal defect in the lawsuit so that the defendant fails to obtain legal protection. This study emphasizes the importance of notary compliance with legal procedures in making and storing deeds to ensure legal certainty for related parties.
KEDUDUKAN HUKUM ATAS KOMPENSASI PENGGUNAAN ATAS TANAH UNTUK AKSES JALAN (STUDI PUTUSAN PERKARA NOMOR 69/PDT.G/2019/PN SMN) Machdi, Machdi; Iriantoro, Agung
Pancasila Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): July
Publisher : Pancasila Law Review

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian dalam penelitian ini, untuk mengetahui kedudukan hukum atas kompensasi pembayaran sebagai pelaksanaan pemberian akses jalan antara pemilik hak atas tanah dengan pengguna akses jalan Putusan Perkara Nomor 69/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Smn dan akibat penyimpanagn terhadap perjanjian yang telah disepakati atas penggunaan tanah sesuai dengan perjanjian berdasarkan Putusan Perkara Nomor 69/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Smn. Penelitian ini, menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif (kepustakaan) dengan analisis secara kualitatif terhadap data sekunder, untuk mendapatkan kesimpulan tentang kedudukan hukum atas kompensasi pembayaran dalam pelaksanaan pemberian akses jalan antara pemilik hak atas tanah dengan pengguna akses jalan Putusan Perkara Nomor 69/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Smn tidak memberikan kepastian hukum bagi Pihak Penggugat dengan Tergugat. Menurut Penggugat menyatakan sebagai kompensasi sebidang tanah seluas 32 m2 untuk akses jalan sedangkan Tergugat menyatakan sebagai jual beli sebidang tanah (32 m2) untuk akses jalan. Akibat penyimpangan terhadap perjanjian yang telah disepakati atas penggunaan tanah sesuai dengan perjanjian berdasarkan Putusan Perkara Nomor 69/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Smn terjadi perbuatan melawan hukum dalam hal pembangunan garasi oleh Tergugat diatas sebidang tanah (32 m2) milik Penggugat yang digunakan sebagai akses jalan. Penyimpangan hal ini, terjadi dikarenakan dikarenakan belum ada aturan mengenai mekanisme dalam pemberian akses jalan dan sanksi kepada masyarakat yang tidak memberikan akses jalan untuk dilewati.
Legal Certainty of Electronic Certificates In National Land Law Reform in The Digital Transformation Era Rahmat, Rahmat; Iriantoro, Agung; Surono, Agus
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2557

Abstract

This article explores the legal legitimacy and challenges in the implementation of electronic land certificates (e-certificates) within Indonesia’s national land administration system, while examining the concept of immutability the inability to alter data in the context of land law. It discusses the legal foundations, implementation processes, evidentiary strength, as well as technical and regulatory challenges, highlighting the potential of e-certificates as instruments that enhance legal certainty and security in the digital era of land administration. The digital transformation of Indonesia’s national land system introduces a significant innovation in the form of electronic land ownership certificates (e-certificates), aimed at improving efficiency, accountability, and legal certainty in land administration. This article critically examines the legal legitimacy, normative basis, and practical implications of implementing e-certificates within the framework of national land law, with a primary focus on the application of the principle of immutability, whereby data cannot be changed or manipulated without a legitimate audit trail. Using a normative juridical approach and empirical analysis based on primary data, this article identifies several implementation challenges including vulnerabilities in information systems, infrastructure gaps, suboptimal legal evidentiary mechanisms in court, and social resistance to the digitization of land ownership documents. The success of e-certificate implementation is highly dependent on data interoperability, resilient system design, and regulatory clarity regarding digital legal evidence. Digital transformation has become a national strategic agenda for bureaucratic modernization and improving public service quality, as outlined in Peraturan Presiden Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 on the Electronic-Based Government System (SPBE). One of the sectors undergoing accelerated digitalization is land administration, through the implementation of electronic certificates by the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN), Peraturan Menteri ATR/BPN Nomor 3 Tahun 2023 concerning Electronic Documents. This initiative aims to create efficient, transparent, and integrated land registration services. However, the use of e-certificates as legal evidence of land rights presents both normative and practical challenges within the national legal system particularly regarding evidentiary strength, document legality, and data integrity and authentication safeguards. The effectiveness of e-certificate implementation depends on a legal system that is adaptive to technology, supported by a digital architecture that incorporates the principle of immutability through cryptographic technology, audit trails, and potential blockchain utilization. Thus, the certificate becomes not only an administrative tool but also a new foundation for the protection of agrarian rights in the digital era. These findings are relevant for policymakers, academics, and land practitioners in designing a modern, inclusive, and legally protective national land system.