Articles
<![CDATA[KEBIJAKAN PEMBERIAN HAK REMISI NARAPIDANA KASUS KORUPSI ]]>
<![CDATA[Elizabeth Ghozali]]>
<![CDATA[ JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Vol 17 No 1 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (347.21 KB)
|
DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v17i1.48
<![CDATA[Remission rights is not inalienable rights (which can not be removed or revoked). Remission is limited rights, by the specific requirements and procedures. However, restrictions on the terms and procedures can not be done through Government Regulation No. 99 of 2012 directive, because according the Corrections Act, remission is the rights of every prisoner without any distinction based on qualifications criminal offense committed. Therefore, in order for remissions does not irregulatities, the determination of restrictions on the remission’s rights of corruption’s prisoners needs to adjustments (harmonization) of the Corrections Act. Keywords: Human Rights, Remission, Corruption.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Numbered Heads Together (NHT) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas III SD ]]>
<![CDATA[Septia Pelelawati Purba]]>;
<![CDATA[Ribka Kariani Sembiring]]>;
<![CDATA[Antonius Remigius Abi]]>;
<![CDATA[Rumiris Lumban Gaol]]>;
<![CDATA[Darinda Sofia Tanjung]]>;
<![CDATA[Yohanes Suhardin]]>;
<![CDATA[Elizabeth Ghozali]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal on Education Vol 7 No 1 (2024): Journal on Education: Volume 7 Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Departement of Mathematics Education ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31004/joe.v7i1.6536
<![CDATA[This research is a type of quantitative research. The research was conducted at SD Negeri 060883 Jln. Darusalam, Kec. Medan Petisah. This study amounted to 23 students based on saturated sample technique. Student learning outcomes showed that the average value of pre-test class III students was 44.60 while the Post-test value was 77.60. Furthermore, hypothesis testing shows that the tcount is 4.666 while the ttable is 1.721, it is proven that the hypothesis is greater than the ttable, so Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. This shows that there is an effect of the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) learning model on student learning outcomes.]]>
<![CDATA[PROBLEMATIK YURIDIS TERHADAP JASA ADVOKAT DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG ADVOKAT ]]>
<![CDATA[Zai, Fransiskus Rahmad]]>;
<![CDATA[Ghozali, Elizabeth]]>;
<![CDATA[Tamba, Pandapotan]]>
<![CDATA[ Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 6, No 4 (2024): Vol. 6 No. 4 Edisi 2 Juli 2024 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v6i4.2576
<![CDATA[The advocate profession is a profession that provides legal services to clients in the form of providing legal advice and/or legal assistance as well as being a legal representative who acts for and on behalf of and in the client's legal interests. Therefore, advocates have the right to receive an honorarium for legal services provided to their clients, the amount of which is determined fairly based on an agreement between the advocate and their client in accordance with the provisions of Article 21 paragraph (2) of the Advocate Law. The arrangement for advocate services shows that the advocate's honorarium is entirely the result of negotiations between the advocate and the client, without limits. The lack of standardization of the regulation of advocate services in the Advocate Law can give rise to several legal problems, including: 1) the cost of legal services becomes expensive, making it quite burdensome for justice seekers; 2) the emergence of disputes or disputes between advocates and clients which result in lawsuits in court; 3) has the potential to become a means of money laundering.Keywords: Advocate, Honorarium]]>
<![CDATA[URGENSI PENGATURAN GRATIFIKASI SEKSUAL SEBAGAI SALAH SATU BENTUK TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI ]]>
<![CDATA[Sitohang, Bertrand Silverius]]>;
<![CDATA[Ghozali, Elizabeth]]>;
<![CDATA[Marbun, Jaminuddin]]>
<![CDATA[ JURNAL PROINTEGRITA Vol 5 No 1 (2020): APRIL ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Darma Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.46930/jurnalprointegrita.v4i1.559
<![CDATA[Research on the urgency of regulating sexual gratification as a form of corruption is aimed at identifying whether or nor a gift can be given to attempt the sexual service received by civil servant or state officials categorized as gratuities related to corruption. In addition this study also aims at finding out and analyzing policies on sexual gratification in Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjuction with law number 20 of 2001 concerning eradication of corruption in Indonesia in the futer (ius contituendum) and finding out the urgency of regulating sexual gratification as a form of corruption. Based on research conducted, it can be seen that the provision of sexual service to civil servants or state administrators has fulfilled the elements of Article 12 B of Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Corruption Crime. Providing gratuities in the form of sex service is against the law that lives in the community. Criminal law policy towards the eradication of sexual gratification in Indonesia can be seen in Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning eradicating Criminal Acts of Corruption in conjuction with Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission. Both of these laws have also been enacted Law Number 7 of 2006 concerning Ratification of the 2003 UN Anti-Corruption Convention. The urgency of regulating sexual gratification as a form corruption is based on the fact that in Indonesia the provison of sex services as a criminal act of corruption has occurred, making it easier to prove the efforts made by the KPK (Corruption Eradication Commission) in cases of sexual gratification by official country]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS YURIDIS OUTSOURCING TERHADAP PERUSAHAAN DAN PEKERJA/BURUH ]]>
<![CDATA[Naibaho, Rumintang]]>;
<![CDATA[Sihotang, Maria Happy Claudia]]>;
<![CDATA[Ghozali, Elizabeth]]>
<![CDATA[ Ensiklopedia Education Review Vol 6, No 3 (2024): Volume 6 No 3 Desember 2024 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33559/eer.v6i3.1435
<![CDATA[Abstract: The author's purpose in conducting research refers to understanding the comparison of the concept of outsourcing between Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower compared to the Job Creation Law No. 6 of 2023, writing this research is important to do in order to find out what things are allowed in the outsourcing system so as not to eliminate legal certainty. The author uses a normative research type that uses secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, namely laws and regulations, secondary legal materials, namely research results and tertiary legal materials obtained from encyclopedias and legal dictionaries, the data is then analyzed qualitatively and conclusions are drawn with deductive logic. In general, this study discusses how changes in the concept of outsourcing between Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower and the Job Creation Law No. 6 of 2023, different concepts will have different impacts on the practice of implementing the concept. The results of this author's research show that with a significant comparison of the concept of outsourcing in the 2023 Job Creation Law regarding the limitations of work implementation related to work agreements, it is contrary to the wishes of workers who are considered detrimental to workers, instead of providing legal certainty to workers, it actually opens up opportunities for companies to be able to outsource work sectors, such as those that are core businesses, and currently no longer use the separation between "work contract agreements" or so-called "worker service provision agreements" work agreements that may be used in outsourcing still have options based on PKWTT with PKWT.Keywords: Outsourcing/Expert Power; Job Creation; Employment; Comparison]]>
<![CDATA[URGENSI FORMULASI JUSTICE COLLABORATOR SEBAGAI SYARAT PEROLEHAN REMISI BAGI NARAPIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Ghozali, Elizabeth]]>
<![CDATA[ Fiat Iustitia : Jurnal Hukum Volume 1 Nomor 2 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (11699.939 KB)
|
DOI: 10.54367/fiat.v1i2.1153
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kerangka hukum terkait justice collaborator dalam sistem hukum Indonesia selama ini dan bagaimana prospek pengaturan tentang justice collaborator dalam pemberian remisi bagi narapidana korupsi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan cara mengkaji dan menganalisis data sekunder yang berkaitan dengan kebijakan tentang justice collaborator dan pemberian remisi bagi narapidana pelaku tindak pidana korupsi, kemudian mengelaborasi pengaturan justice collaborator di negara lain sebagai bahan perbandingan dengan menggunakan metode analisis yang mengarah kepada pendekatan futuristik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kerangka hukum terkait justice collaborator dalam tindak pidana korupsi belum mendapatkan pengaturan yang memadai sebagai landasan hukum bagi aparat penegak hukum untuk memberikan perlindungan maksimal kepada justice collaborator, dan prospek pengaturan terhadap justice collaborator berkaitan dengan pemberian remisi narapidana korupsi di Indonesia pada masa mendatang memiliki peluang yang besar mengingat peranannya yang sangat strategis dalam mengungkap jaringan tindak pidana korupsi yang terorganisir..]]>
<![CDATA[PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM KERANGKA PERSPEKTIF POLITIK HUKUM PIDANA ]]>
<![CDATA[Ghozali, Elizabeth]]>
<![CDATA[ Fiat Iustitia : Jurnal Hukum Volume 2 Nomor 1 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (188.457 KB)
|
DOI: 10.54367/fiat.v2i1.1430
<![CDATA[Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perkembangan pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia ditinjau dari perspektif politik hukum nasional. Penelitian yang dilakukan adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan bahan hukum sebagai sumber utamanya dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan komparatif (comparative approach), dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Teknik analisis dimulai dengan inventarisasi (identifikasi) setelah diklasifikasikan, kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia dalam perspektif politik hukum nasional lebih mengedepankan kepada manfaat hukum dan urgensi kebutuhan hukum dalam hal penegakan hukum dengan melakukan penyesuaian dengan kebijakan dalam Konvensi yang diratifikasi menyangkut kebijakan legislasi terkait kemungkinan-kemungkinan perumusan unsur-unsur tindak pidana korupsi dalam upaya mencegah dan memberantas korupsi di sektor swasta serta kebijakan kriminalisasi beberapa bentuk tindak pidana korupsi.]]>
<![CDATA[URGENSI FORMULASI JUSTICE COLLABORATOR SEBAGAI SYARAT PEROLEHAN REMISI BAGI NARAPIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Ghozali, Elizabeth]]>
<![CDATA[ Fiat Iustitia : Jurnal Hukum Volume 1 Nomor 2 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.54367/fiat.v1i2.1153
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kerangka hukum terkait justice collaborator dalam sistem hukum Indonesia selama ini dan bagaimana prospek pengaturan tentang justice collaborator dalam pemberian remisi bagi narapidana korupsi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan cara mengkaji dan menganalisis data sekunder yang berkaitan dengan kebijakan tentang justice collaborator dan pemberian remisi bagi narapidana pelaku tindak pidana korupsi, kemudian mengelaborasi pengaturan justice collaborator di negara lain sebagai bahan perbandingan dengan menggunakan metode analisis yang mengarah kepada pendekatan futuristik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kerangka hukum terkait justice collaborator dalam tindak pidana korupsi belum mendapatkan pengaturan yang memadai sebagai landasan hukum bagi aparat penegak hukum untuk memberikan perlindungan maksimal kepada justice collaborator, dan prospek pengaturan terhadap justice collaborator berkaitan dengan pemberian remisi narapidana korupsi di Indonesia pada masa mendatang memiliki peluang yang besar mengingat peranannya yang sangat strategis dalam mengungkap jaringan tindak pidana korupsi yang terorganisir..]]>
<![CDATA[PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM KERANGKA PERSPEKTIF POLITIK HUKUM PIDANA ]]>
<![CDATA[Ghozali, Elizabeth]]>
<![CDATA[ Fiat Iustitia : Jurnal Hukum Volume 2 Nomor 1 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.54367/fiat.v2i1.1430
<![CDATA[Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perkembangan pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia ditinjau dari perspektif politik hukum nasional. Penelitian yang dilakukan adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan bahan hukum sebagai sumber utamanya dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan komparatif (comparative approach), dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Teknik analisis dimulai dengan inventarisasi (identifikasi) setelah diklasifikasikan, kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia dalam perspektif politik hukum nasional lebih mengedepankan kepada manfaat hukum dan urgensi kebutuhan hukum dalam hal penegakan hukum dengan melakukan penyesuaian dengan kebijakan dalam Konvensi yang diratifikasi menyangkut kebijakan legislasi terkait kemungkinan-kemungkinan perumusan unsur-unsur tindak pidana korupsi dalam upaya mencegah dan memberantas korupsi di sektor swasta serta kebijakan kriminalisasi beberapa bentuk tindak pidana korupsi.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Protection for Children in Conflict with the Law Under the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Elizabeth Ghozali]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Ansori Lubis]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV. RADJA PUBLIKA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i5.3912
<![CDATA[This research is entitled Legal Protection for Children in Conflict with the Law in a Review According to the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. The method used in this paper is based on normative juridical research. Writing in this scientific journal uses a statutory and conceptual approach. Journals that use normative legal research are by collecting secondary data sources in the field of law from the point of view of their binding strength. In the normative research method, various library materials are used in accordance with the legal issues being studied. The Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System provides a new color in the dynamics and development of law in Indonesia, especially towards the criminal law system. From experience in handling the problem of children in conflict with the law, when all parties play an active role, especially the government, then the number of juvenile delinquents which is now increasing can be suppressed and handled properly. In terms of giving special attention to children's problems, the government must seriously and fully implement what has been mandated by law. There is a need for a national comprehensive child protection system to prevent and deal with violence or exploitation of children in conflict with the law. Thus, the protection of children is not only limited to the government as administrators of the state, but also carried out by parents, families and communities to be responsible for protecting and maintaining children's human rights. On the other hand.]]>
