Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.282
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Mizan (e-Journal) SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Al-Izzah: Jurnal Hasil-Hasil Penelitian Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Islam Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum SETARA: Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak Syakhshiyyah Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Moderatio : Jurnal Moderasi Beragama Siyasah : Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Tapis : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah
oktora, nency dela
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Kontroversi Putusan Hukum Tentang Royalti Hak Cipta Lagu Sebagai Harta Bersama Septiani, Dini Lionita; Setiawan, Wahyu; Oktora, Nency Dela; Angkasa, Nawa; Fernando, Henky
Al-Mizan (e-Journal) Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025): Al-Mizan (e-Journal)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30603/am.v21i1.5622

Abstract

The controversy over legal decisions regarding song copyright royalties as joint property in Indonesia can generally be termed joint ownership of individual rights. This paradigm assesses the status of joint property based on the time of acquisition, the spouse's contribution, or the character of the asset. Joint property in Indonesian marital law is all property acquired during the marriage period unless there is a property separation agreement agreed upon before marriage. Inherited assets, inheritance, or grants remain the personal property of each spouse unless otherwise agreed. This issue arises because royalties have both a personal nature and long-term economic potential. This article analyses the controversy using a qualitative approach with a case study method, exploring the forms of controversy, causal factors, and implications. Data were obtained from a qualitative case study conducted by reviewing decision No. 1622/Pdt.G/2023/PA.JB and interviewing 3 judges and 2 advocates. The main findings show that controversy arose in three aspects: royalty division, copyright status, and asset division. Contributing factors include the misalignment between the personal nature of copyright and the communal concept of property, legal uncertainty, and the difficulty of economic valuation of song copyrights. The implications of this controversy include shifting social norms, uncertainty for creators, and increased complexity in asset division. This research underscores the need for comprehensive legal reform to accommodate the complexity of copyright royalty issues in the context of common property, as well as the development of more accurate valuation methods. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the interaction between intellectual property law and family law in Indonesia.
Meneropong Tradisi: Sanksi Pelanggaran Hukum Adat pada Masyarakat Ulun Lampung Oktora, Nency Dela
Tapis: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Tapis : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat of Universitas Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/tapis.v7i2.8085

Abstract

The customary law of the people of Lampung in Sukadana District is guided by the Ketaro Adat Lappung which is a book used for the people of Lampung Pepadun. The Lampung Adat Ketaro Manuscript contains customary rules, regarding rules of conduct, marriage, appointment of counterweights, and fines and sanctions (Cepalo 12 (severe sanctions) and Cepalo 80 (ordinary sanctions)) for those who violate customary rules in indigenous peoples. This research is qualitative descriptive research (field research) with inductive thinking. The methods used were interviews, documentation, and observation. Respondents were obtained through purposive sampling techniques. Researchers use language translators in interviews. The implementation of Lampung customary law in relation to customary sanctions has been actualized. If someone violates customary law, he is obliged to report the customary elder regarding his mistake and apologize and repent, then the customary elders consult to decide on a sanction. After the sanction is paid, the pepadun will be upright again. Sanctions for violations, namely compensation for immaterial damages, payment of customary money to those affected, shame cover, apologies, various death sentences, exile (non-active) from society and placing the person outside the legal system. Factors influencing the implementation of Lampung's customary law are its customary law, customary law enforcers, means and facilities to support the implementation of customary law, society (HR), and culture/culture.
Implementasi Syura dalam Sistem Demokrasi Indonesia Oktora, Nency Dela; Nency Dela; Anjani, Kusifa; Hermawati, Nety
Siyasah Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Siyasah Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara
Publisher : UIN Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/1ahmpf04

Abstract

Implementasi syura’ dalam demokrasi mencerminkan integrasi nilai-nilai musyawarah untuk mufakat yang terkandung dalam prinsip Pancasila. Syura’ berasal dari tradisi Islam menekankan pada proses pengambilan keputusan melalui musyawarah dan pasrtisipasi aktif semua pihak untuk mancapai kesepakatan bersama. Dalam konteks Indonesia, nilai syura’ ini diadaptasi dalam struktur perwakilan rakyat, terutama dalam lembaga Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat (MPR), yang berfungsi untuk merumuskan dan mengesahkan undang-undang melalui proses musyawarah. Dalam system ini pengambilan keputusan lebih mengutamakan musyawarah daripada pemungutan suara, pemungutan suara hanya dilakukan apabila terjadi kebuntuan. Meskipun Indonesia mengadopsi sistem demokrasi modern, prinsip syura tetap dijunjung  tinggi sebagai dasar pengambilan keputusan yang mencerminkan kehendak rakyat. Artikel ini membaha stentang implementasi syura’ dalam proses legislasi Indonesia dan bagaimana konsep ini beradaptasi dengan praktik pemerintahan modern, yang mengadopsi elemen-elemen seperti checks and balance untuk menjaga keseimbangan kekuasaan dan mencegah potensi kepemimpinan otoriter. Melalui penerapan prinsip syura’, diharapkan proses poliyik di Indonesia dapat lebih inklusif, transparan, dan mencerminkan aspirasi masyarakat secara luas.
Kumulasi Isbat Nikah dan Cerai Gugat dalam Penyelesaian Perceraian pada Perkawinan Tidak Tercatat: Analisis Perlindungan Hak Kurniati, Ratna; Oktora, Nency Dela; Sudirman
Al-Izzah: Jurnal Hasil-Hasil Penelitian Vol 21, No. 1, Mei 2026
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31332/ai.vi.14010

Abstract

Unregistered marriages often create legal uncertainty that disadvantages women and children, particularly in cases involving domestic disputes and violence. Without valid legal documents, victims face difficulties in obtaining legal protection and access to civil rights. This study aims to analyze: (1) the judges’ legal considerations in accepting the cumulation of marriage legalization (isbat nikah) and divorce claims, especially when the defendant is uncooperative; and (2) the effectiveness of such cumulation in providing legal certainty and protecting the rights of women and children. In this context, case cumulation refers to the combination of a marriage legalization petition and a divorce lawsuit within a single judicial process and decision. This study employs a normative-empirical legal approach using a case study method through the analysis of religious court decisions and interviews with judges, analyzed descriptively and analytically. The findings show that the cumulation mechanism constitutes a juridical breakthrough based on a progressive interpretation of marriage legalization provisions, the principles of simple, fast, and low-cost justice, and the principle of maslahah. This mechanism is effective because it enables marriage legalization and divorce decisions to be resolved in a single proceeding, thereby ensuring faster protection of the civil rights of wives and children. The scientific contribution of this study lies in its examination of case cumulation as a form of progressive legal protection for women and children in unregistered marriages, particularly when the defendant is uncooperative.
Co-Authors Anjani, Kusifa Ardliansyah, Moelki Fahmi Fathoni, Muhammad Nur Fernando, Henky Hidayat, Riyan Erwin kurniati, ratna Muchtar, Ibnu Hasan Mufliha Wijayati Muthoharoh, Lailatul Nasrudin, Muhamad Nawa Angkasa, Nawa Nency Dela Nety Hermawati, Nety Putra, Muhammad Yusuf Rahmadian, Isna Relfi, Kelin Ama Rizka Diana Septiani, Dini Lionita Sudirman Sukmawati, Berlia Tutik Hamidah Wahyu Setiawan