Tanadi, Caroline
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Formulation of mice diet with low cholecalciferol content Sumariyono; Handayani, Dian; Setiati, Siti; Amalialjinan, Nadia; Abellia, Gaby; Anindyanti, Risma Debby; Dienillah, Syifa Sarah; Ernawati; Tanadi, Caroline
Medical Journal of Indonesia Vol. 34 No. 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.13181/mji.oa.257859

Abstract

BACKGROUND Vitamin D deficiency has been linked to autoimmune diseases, cancer, and cardiovascular diseases. Although 1 study attempted to elucidate the ingredients required to make this diet, the process remained unclear. Hence, this study aimed to customize a low cholecalciferol diet with good tolerability in mice. METHODS We customized a diet containing a normal cholecalciferol content (1 IU/g diet) and another with a low cholecalciferol content (0.05 IU/g diet). Samples from both diets were sent to an independent laboratory to ensure that the levels of cholecalciferol, phosphorus, and calcium present in the custom diets matched our calculations. 5 mice were fed the customized normal cholecalciferol diet for 1 week to assess tolerability. Tolerability was assessed by measuring the amount of food consumed, weight gained, and the presence of any adverse events. RESULTS Cholecalciferol, phosphorous, and calcium levels in both diets satisfactorily matched our calculations. The diet was well tolerated without any adverse events or mortalities. The mice consumed an adequate amount of food (mean: 5.34 [0.08] g diet/day, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.12–5.56; 19.38 kcal, fat: 0.43 g, protein: 0.14 g, carbohydrates: 3.16 g, and cholecalciferol: 0.007 mg) and gained a slight amount of weight by the end of the experiment (mean: 1.86 [0.46] g, 95% CI: 0.58–3.14). CONCLUSIONS This study successfully created 2 custom diets with quantified cholecalciferol contents. This animal model may prove valuable for studies involving vitamin D.
The Role of Circulating Tumour Cells and Carcinoembryonic Antigen as Diagnostic Tool for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Indonesia Angraeni, Sri; Abdullah, Murdani; Hasan, Irsan; Rinaldi, Ikhwan; Fauzi, Achmad; Martin, Cleopas; Shatri, Hamzah; Irawan, Cosphiadi; Nursyirwan, Saskia Aziza; Ibrahim, Febiansyah; Siregar, Lianda; Loho, Imelda Maria; Waspodo, Agus Sudiro; Margaluta, Ariansah; Firsyada, Fajar; Darnindro, Nikko; Lutfiah, Evah; Tanadi, Caroline; Ilyas, Mohammad
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy Vol 26, No 3 (2025): VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, December, 2025
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/2632025245-254

Abstract

Background: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) have a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of only 14%. Early detection and early intervention may improve outcome. Both circulating tumour cells (CTC) and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) have been suggested as diagnostic biomarkers for metastatic CRC. This study explored the performance of CTC and CEA as a tools for the detection of metastatic colorectal cancer in Indonesia.Methods: This study was conducted from December 2024 to April 2025 on metastatic colorectal cancer patients from three hospitals in Jakarta. CTC was analysed using the gradient density method and flow cytometry. CEA was analysed using chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay.Results: This study recruited 160 patients with colorectal cancer patients of whom, 45% were known to have metastatic colorectal cancer. The median age was 57 (47—66) years and analysis was done at one time point only. The area under the curve (AUC) for CTC, CEA, and the combination of both CTC and CEA in diagnosing metastatic colorectal cancer was 0.579, 0.811, and 0.703, respectively. CTC showed 56.94% sensitivity and 50.00% specificity in detecting metastatic colorectal cancer. Meanwhile, CEA showed higher sensitivity (72.22%) and specificity (72.72%). Combination of both CTC and CEA increased sensitivity to 91.67%, but with a lower specificity of 37.50%. The optimal cut-off for CTC and CEA were 34.5 cells/3 ml and 18.31 ng/ml, respectively.Conclusion: CEA showed a better performance than CTC in diagnosing metastatic colorectal cancer. Combination of CTC and CEA showed promising potential as a valuable surveillance tool for detecting metastasis in colorectal cancers, but not as a primary diagnostic tool.