Ibrahim, Febiansyah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria for predicting surgical site infection in elective laparotomy patients Octaviani, Pauline; Wulandari, Yohannessa; Ibrahim, Febiansyah; Andayani, Diyah Eka
International Journal of Public Health Science (IJPHS) Vol 13, No 4: December 2024
Publisher : Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/ijphs.v13i4.24175

Abstract

Laparotomy surgery patients are at risk for complication including surgical site infections (SSI) which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Malnutrition has been identified as a risk factor for the occurrence of SSI but preoperative malnutrition identification remains low. The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) has published a new, practical, and easily applicable definition of malnutrition. This study aims to evaluate whether malnutrition according to GLIM criteria is a predictor of SSI in elective laparotomy patients. This prospective cohort study involved 123 subjects aged 18-65 years undergoing elective laparotomy, without diabetes history. Their malnutrition status was assessed using GLIM criteria with bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) to evaluate muscle mass. A total 62 subjects were categorized into the malnutrition group and the remaining into nonmalnutrition group and then monitored for the presence of SSI up to 10 days postoperatively. SSI occurred in 13.8% of the subjects. The analysis showed a strong association between malnutrition and SSI in elective post laparotomy (RR 4.6; 95%CI 1.4-15.1; p=0.005). Malnutrition according to GLIM criteria is a significant predictor of SSI in elective post laparotomy patients.
The Role of Circulating Tumour Cells and Carcinoembryonic Antigen as Diagnostic Tool for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Indonesia Angraeni, Sri; Abdullah, Murdani; Hasan, Irsan; Rinaldi, Ikhwan; Fauzi, Achmad; Martin, Cleopas; Shatri, Hamzah; Irawan, Cosphiadi; Nursyirwan, Saskia Aziza; Ibrahim, Febiansyah; Siregar, Lianda; Loho, Imelda Maria; Waspodo, Agus Sudiro; Margaluta, Ariansah; Firsyada, Fajar; Darnindro, Nikko; Lutfiah, Evah; Tanadi, Caroline; Ilyas, Mohammad
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy Vol 26, No 3 (2025): VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, December, 2025
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/2632025245-254

Abstract

Background: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) have a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of only 14%. Early detection and early intervention may improve outcome. Both circulating tumour cells (CTC) and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) have been suggested as diagnostic biomarkers for metastatic CRC. This study explored the performance of CTC and CEA as a tools for the detection of metastatic colorectal cancer in Indonesia.Methods: This study was conducted from December 2024 to April 2025 on metastatic colorectal cancer patients from three hospitals in Jakarta. CTC was analysed using the gradient density method and flow cytometry. CEA was analysed using chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay.Results: This study recruited 160 patients with colorectal cancer patients of whom, 45% were known to have metastatic colorectal cancer. The median age was 57 (47—66) years and analysis was done at one time point only. The area under the curve (AUC) for CTC, CEA, and the combination of both CTC and CEA in diagnosing metastatic colorectal cancer was 0.579, 0.811, and 0.703, respectively. CTC showed 56.94% sensitivity and 50.00% specificity in detecting metastatic colorectal cancer. Meanwhile, CEA showed higher sensitivity (72.22%) and specificity (72.72%). Combination of both CTC and CEA increased sensitivity to 91.67%, but with a lower specificity of 37.50%. The optimal cut-off for CTC and CEA were 34.5 cells/3 ml and 18.31 ng/ml, respectively.Conclusion: CEA showed a better performance than CTC in diagnosing metastatic colorectal cancer. Combination of CTC and CEA showed promising potential as a valuable surveillance tool for detecting metastasis in colorectal cancers, but not as a primary diagnostic tool.