Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

GOOD GOVERNANCE (TATA KELOLA PEMERINTAHAN YANG BAIK) DALAM PEMBERIAN IZIN OLEH PEMERINTAH DAERAH DI BIDANG PERTAMBANGAN Oheo K Haris
Yuridika Vol. 30 No. 1 (2015): Volume 30 No 1 Januari 2015
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (362.276 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v30i1.4879

Abstract

Instruments in terms of the provisions of the mining law has been regulated by law No. 11 of 1967, in which the government's legal position is not comparable to the investors. granting it is the government or ruling authority in order to protect the interests of citizens in order to establish a concrete action even if it deviates from the provisions that are prohibited. Good governance or good governance is closely related to human rights. Thus, that one of the bases existence of a support or foundation of a discretion in this case the nature of the license by the government especially the mining sector is the presence of good governance or Good pemeritahan Governancne so as to create a harmonization as state officials
Victim’s Involvement Model in Children Legal Process Based on Law no. 11/2012 on Children Criminal Justice System Oheo K Haris; Ali Risky
Yuridika Vol. 34 No. 1 (2019): Volume 34 No 1 January 2019
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (272.255 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v34i1.7943

Abstract

The enactment of Law N0. 11/2012 on Children Criminal Justice System is a new hope for the rights of the victims of a crime. This Law has given a huge opportunity to the victims by means of the concept of restorative justice. This paper seeks to offer a model of victim’s involvement which is implementable either outside or inside of the judicial system. Firstly, accessibility for the victim in this law has placed the concept of restorative justice. The model of restorative justice offered in this law is the gate for the crime victim who fought for their rights. Restorative justice was essentially stands between the victim and the offender and focuses on the effects of crimes. Secondly, the term diversion is the transfer of resolution for the process of the juvenile case from the judicial system to outside of the criminal system. Togetherness for all of the involved groups is a better solution in certain case as it can solve problem and create better unprecedented bindings. This attempt is in order to seek solution, reconciliation, and not to seek revenge for a criminal offence. Thirdly, victim’s invovelment in criminal system allows for witnesses to come forward. But they should have legal protection and should avoid bad label. The next model is an opportunity for the juvenile victism before the court handing down the verdict. 
The Principle of Regulation of Mining Business License La Sensu Sensu; Oheo K. Haris; Muhammad Nazar
Yuridika Vol. 36 No. 1 (2021): Volume 36 No 1 January 2021
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (266.287 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v36i1.23124

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to see and analyze the substance of a mining business permit regulation for the government to communities around mining and to find out and analyze the basic principles of a government policy to give birth to the welfare of communities around mining. This research used socio-legal research, which is a type of research whose orientation is focused on legal and non-legal aspects, namely the work of law in society and government. This revealed is that (1) the nature of Mining Business Permit Arrangements in regional autonomy has created euphoria among local governments, one of which is the assumption that mining belongs to the region and the local community; (2). Whereas the basic principle of the birth of a policy that does not pay attention to the welfare and interests of the local community will result in environmental damage, disharmony between residents, and the absence of commitment to building from mining entrepreneurs from the community around the mine.
Criminal Law Aspect of Illegal Transshipment Under Act Number 45 of 2009 Concerning Fisheries Herman Herman; Oheo K Haris; Syahbudin Syahbudin
Yuridika Vol. 36 No. 2 (2021): Volume 36 No 2 May 2021
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (352.941 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v36i2.23225

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the practice of illegal transshipment in compliance with Act Number 45 of 2009 criminal provisions law concerning Fisheries, using legal concept, law, and case approaches. Nowadays, there are various operational modes of fish theft, with poor regulations that maximally accommodate crimes related to fisheries by perpetrators. Therefore, due to its unsustainability and economic loss, the fisheries and marine sector in Indonesia has to improve its performance. The results show that illegal transshipment engages some elements contained in Article 94 and 94A of Act Number 45 of 2009 which was an amendment of Act Number 31 of 2004. According to article 94, when a fishing vessel is caught transferring shipment in the middle of a high sea without in possession of a license called SIKPI, its owner/s are sentenced to 5-years imprisonment with a one billion five hundred million rupiah fine. Meanwhile, according to Article 94A, when a fishing vessel is caught using fake licenses such as SIUP, SIPI, and SIKPI, its owners are sentenced to 7 years imprisonment with a fine of three billion rupiahs.
Pembadanan Prinsip Kepemerintahan yang Baik (Good Governance) dalam Penerbitan Izin Usaha Pertambangan (IUP) (Studi Kasus di Sulawesi Tenggara) Oheo K. Haris
Perspektif Hukum VOLUME 15 ISSUE 2
Publisher : Faculty of Law Hang Tuah University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/ph.v15i2.32

Abstract

This work is aimed at exploring appropriate method in embodying and applying the principle of good governance in managing strategic resources, i.e in issuing mining license. Governing this mining actually has crucial matters in order to underpine a huge value as well as benefit toward the economic growth and sustainable development. This effort is importance to prevent maladministration, corruption, and the deterioration of environmental quality that may block the sustainable development. This maladministration in issuing mining license has created complexity and overlap administrative decisions, either at the vertical or horizontal. At the vertical level the tension, conflicted, and overlapped administrative decision could be seen between central and local government, whereas at horizontal level, conflicted decision could be seen at sectoral department. For that reason, this work offers an appropriate method in integrating and embodying the principle of good governance, such as transparency, carefulness, and proportionality in issuing mining license. The application of this method may create a holistic and integrated policy in managing and optimizing collective strategic resources for the greatest benefit for greatest number of people.
Penguatan Putusan Hukum Adat Melalui Penetapan Pengadilan dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Umum David David; Oheo K. Haris; Handrawan Handrawan
Halu Oleo Legal Research Vol 4, No 1 (2022): Halu Oleo Legal Research: Volume 4 Issue 1
Publisher : Halu Oleo University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33772/holresch.v4i1.25163

Abstract

Dalam setiap Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis kekuatan berlakunya hukum adat dalam penyelesaian perkara adat pidana. Untuk menganalisis kebijakan hukum pidana tentang penetapan putusan hukum adat melalui pengadilan, pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conseptual approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach) dengan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder dengan teknis analisis preskriptif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Terdapat 69 kasus perkara tindak pidana yang diselesaikan melalui hukum adat di antaranya 40 kasus yang tidak dilanjutkan dan 29 kasus yang dilanjutkan ke pengadilan. Alasan pengajuan ke pengadilan karena perkara tersebut sudah terbit Surat Pemerintah Dimulainya Penyidikan (SPDP). Dalam kaitannya dengan studi pendekatan kasus atas Putusan Kasus Nomor 65/Pid.B/2019 Pengadilan Negeri Kendari maka putusan telah melanggar asas nebis in idem karena tetap menjatuhkan pidana selama 4 bulan dan putusan hakim tersebut hanya menjadikan putusan hukum adat sebagai alasan peringanan hukuman bukan penghapus pidana. Kebijakan hukum pidana tentang penetapan putusan hukum adat melalui pengadilan adalah penting untuk dimuat di dalam Undang-undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan dan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang KUHAP sebagai payung hukum atas pengakuan putusan hukum adat yang selama ini belum diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undang. Perlunya penetapan pengadilan terhadap putusan hukum adat agar menjadi dasar dalam penghentian perkara di tingkat penyidikan melalui undang-undang yang secara teknis dapat diatur melalui Peraturan Kapolri, Peraturan Kejaksaan Agung dan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung.
Disparitas Putusan Pidana dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Anak (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 15/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.Adl dan Putusan Nomor: 17/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.Adl) Vivi Fatmawati A.; Herman Herman; Oheo K. Haris
Halu Oleo Legal Research Vol 4, No 1 (2022): Halu Oleo Legal Research: Volume 4 Issue 1
Publisher : Halu Oleo University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33772/holresch.v4i1.25157

Abstract

Dalam Perkara Nomor 15/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.Adl dan Perkara Nomor 17/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.Adl, terdapat pemidanaan yang berbeda untuk kasus yang sama atau serupa (sama delik). Dalam perkara Nomor 15/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.Adl, anak dipidana penjara selama 6 bulan sedangkan dalam perkara Nomor 17/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.Adl, anak dipidana penjara selama 2 tahun 6 bulan dalam tindak pidana yang sama (sama delik), yaitu tindak pidana “dengan sengaja membujuk anak untuk melakukan persetubuhan dengannya”. Terlihat perbedaan yang mencolok dalam putusan tersebut, yang tentunya akan menimbulkan rasa ketidakadilan bagi pelaku anak. Ada beberapa faktor yang mempengaruhi sehingga terjadinya disparitas dalam perkara anak antara lain aparat penegak hukum seperti hakim, penuntut umum dan penyidik masih banyak yang belum bersertifikat keterampilan petugas anak sehingga menyebabkan perbedaan orientasi dimana aparat penegak hukum yang bersertifikat childrenfficer skill akan berorientasi pada kepentingan terbaik baik bagi anak maupun sebaliknya. Pekerja sosial yang mendampingi Korban dan PK BAPAS yang mendampingi Pelaku Anak selalu memberikan rekomendasi untuk menjebloskan Anak ke dalam Lapas. Sedangkan untuk menghindari disparitas pengambilan keputusan dalam kasus anak, maka seluruh aparat penegak hukum, PK BAPAS dan Pekerja Sosial harus memiliki orientasi dan pemahaman yang sama untuk kepentingan terbaik anak dimana hukuman merupakan upaya terakhir (ultimum remedium) dan juga harus berorientasi pada keadilan restoratif.
TELAAH YURIDIS PENERAPAN SANKSI DI BAWAH MINIMUM KHUSUS PADA PERKARA PIDANA KHUSUS Haris, Oheo K.
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): OCTOBER
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (455.179 KB) | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v2i2.663

Abstract

TELAAH YURIDIS PENERAPAN SANKSI DI BAWAH MINIMUM KHUSUS PADA PERKARA PIDANA KHUSUS    Oheo K.HarisThe School of Law, University of Halu Oleo, Kendari, IndonesiaABSTRAK:Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Pengadilan Negeri di lingkungan Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta yang meliputi Pengadilan Negeri Sleman, kota Yogyakarta dan Bantul. Pengadilan tersebut dipilih dengan pertimbangan terdapat beberapa perkara yang menyangkut tindak pidana khusus. Tujuan penelitian : (1) untuk mengetahui apakah hakim boleh menjatuhkan sanksi di bawah standar minimum khusus pada perkara pidana khusus dan (2) untuk mengetahui apa dasar yuridis pemikiran hakim dalam menjatuhkan sanksi pidana di bawah minimum khusus pada perkara pidana khusus. Untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut, maka penelitian dilaksanakan dengan menggunakan rancangan penelitian hukum. Sampling meliputi subjek sampling yang ditentukan secara purposive. Bahan hukum terdiri dari: bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang dikumpulkan melalui wawancara dan dokumentasi. Analisis dilakukan secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan : (1) Peranan hakim dalam penerapan sanksi minimum dalam tindak pidana khusus pada proses peradilan pidana sangat besar, yaitu sebagai pemberi putusan akhir, hakim berpedoman pada peraturan perundang-undangan. Dengan demikian, maka penulis berpendapat bahwa hakim tidak boleh menjatuhkan sanksi di bawah standar minimum. Dengan alasan bahwa negara Indonesia menganut Sistem Kontinental yakni hakim (sebagai pedoman pemidanaan) terikat oleh undangundang (aliran konservatif). Hal tersebut, sebagai realisasi asas the binding persuasive of precedent. Selain itu, konteks sanksi minimum yang terdapat dalam rumusan pasal terhadap tindak pidana khusus, secara terang dan jelas, terdapat pernyataan sanksi pidana yang memuat ketentuan maksimal dan minimal, sehingga tidak memerlukan penafsiran lanjutan. (2) Selain mengacu Pasal 103 KUHP dan 284 ayat (1) dan (2) KUHAP, dasar yuridis penerapan sanksi, hakim mengacu pada peraturan perundangundangan tindak pidana khusus yang mengatur ketentuan minimum khusus. Selain kedua pasal di atas, yurisprudensi dapat digunakan sebagai dasar yuridis dalam penjatuhan sanksi, dengan catatan, tetap mengacu ketentuan minimum sekurang-kurangya sama atau di atas minimum.Katakunci : Penerapan Sanksi dan Pidana Khusus          THE JURIDIS STUDY OF SANCTION APPLICATIONS UNDER SPECIAL MINIMUMON SPECIAL CREDIT CODES  Oheo K.Haris The School of Law, University of Halu Oleo, Kendari, Indonesia  This research was carried out in the District Court in the Province of Yogyakarta Special Region covering the District Court of Sleman, the city of Yogyakarta and Bantul. The court was chosen with consideration of several matters involving special crimes. The objectives of the study are: (1) to determine whether a judge may impose sanctions below minimum standards specifically on special criminal cases and (2) to find out what the judicial mind's juridical grounds in imposing criminal sanctions are below a special minimum on special criminal cases. To achieve these objectives, the research was conducted by using the research design law. Sampling includes the subject of sampling which is determined purposively. Legal material consists of: primary and secondary legal materials, they were collected through interviews and documentation. The analysis was done qualitatively. The results of the research show: (1) the judge had a big role in the application of minimum sanction in a special criminal act in the criminal justice process, namely as the final decision maker, the judge is guided by the legislation. Thus, the researcher argues that the judge should not impose sanctions below minimum standards. For that reason, the Indonesian state embraces the Continental System ie the judge (as a guideline of punishment) is bound by the law (conservative school). That is, as the realization of the binding persuasive principle precedent. In addition, the context of minimum sanctions contained in the formulation of the article on specific criminal acts, clearly contain statement of criminal sanctions containing the provisions of the maximum and minimum, so it does not require further interpretation. (2) In addition to referring to Article 103 of the Criminal Code and 284 paragraphs (1) and (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the juridical basis for the application of sanctions, judges refer to special criminal law legislation governing special minimum provisions. In addition to the above two chapters, jurisprudence may be used as a juridical basis in the imposition of sanctions, with a note, still referring to the minimum requirement of at least equal to or above the minimum.  Keywords: Application of Special Penalties and Crimes
CYBER DEFAMATION IN INDONESIA'S NATIONAL CRIMINAL CODE: AN ANALYSIS OF THE NEW PROVISIONS Abdaud, Faisal; Haris, Oheo Kaimuddin
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 26, No 3: December 2024: Law and Justice in Digital Age
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v26i3.34004

Abstract

This article investigates the impact of cyber defamation regulations within Indonesia's National Criminal Code (NCC), a topic worthy of investigation due to the significant changes in the definition and scope of cyber defamation offenses following the NCC's enactment. Through a normative legal research approach, the study examines legal rules, principles, and doctrines, employing both statutory and conceptual analyses. The findings indicate that the NCC's provisions on cyber defamation, as lex generalis, take precedence over Article 27 paragraph (3) of the Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE) Act, while Article 27A of the Second Amendment to the ITE Law remains in provisional effect until the NCC's full implementation in 2026. Notably, cyber defamation is addressed in seven articles (Articles 433-439) within the NCC, which also specifically cover defamation against the President, government, and state institutions. To mitigate potential ambiguities, the development of implementing regulations is recommended to clarify the application of these NCC defamation provisions. The changes align with established legal principles, ensuring a coherent and effective regulatory framework. This article contributes to a deeper understanding of the NCC's new cyber defamation provisions by analyzing their scope, implications, and the need for implementing regulations to ensure consistent and effective application.
Criminal Law Study on Narcotics Abuse Rehabilitation Widiasyam, Salma; Haris, Oheo; Abdullah, Siti Aisah
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol 5, No 1 (2020): Indonesian J. Crim. L. Stud. (May, 2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v5i1.25330

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine whether the rehabilitation of the victims of narcotics abuse in the decree of the District Court of Kendari No. 236/Pid. Sus/2019/PN K has fulfilled the element of Article 54 Act number 35 year 2009. The type of research used in this study is normative research, using the Statute Approach, Case Approach, Conceptual Approach.Based on the results the authors conclude that narcotic addicts and narcotics abuse victims are obliged to undergo medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation. The judge in the its verdict prosecute convicted because it has been proven legally and committed guilty of committing a criminal offence "narcotic abuse for himself", dropping a criminal against the defendant with imprisonment for 1 (one) year and 2 (two) months have in accordance with article 127 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 Year 2009. However, in the ruling judge ignores article 127 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of Law No. 35 Year 2009 that the obligation of the judge in providing rehabilitation efforts against the defendant cases of drug abuse in line with the issuance of Circular Letter of Supreme Court No. 4 Year 2010.