Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.57
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL OBOR PENMAS DIKEMAS (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat) KREATIF : Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Manajemen Universitas Pamulang Jurnal Pendidikan Luar Sekolah Res Nullius Law Journal Jurnal Obor Penmas: Pendidikan Luar Sekolah Journal of Lifelong Learning (JOLL) Jumper : Jurnal Mahasiswa Pendidikan Olahraga Abdimas Awang Long: Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Teknologika Jurnal Healthy Mandala Waluya
Sutarjo
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mechanical Engineering Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 16 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Res Nullius Law Journal

 1 
LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST JUVENILE DELINQUENCY IN INDONESIA IN RELATION TO THE PURPOSE OF LAW Sutarjo; Diah Pudjiastuti; Subagyo Sri Utomo; Happy Ferovina Wuntu
Res Nullius Law Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Volume 8 No. 1 Januari 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Komputer Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34010/rnlj.v8i1.18610

Abstract

Juvenile delinquency in Indonesia has shown an increasingly serious and complex trend, while the various legal instruments and child protection policies in place have not yet been fully effective in curbing the rate of such deviant behavior. This study specifically aims to analyze the gap between the normative framework of law enforcement against juvenile delinquency—particularly through the Juvenile Criminal Justice System and the principles of restorative justice—and empirical practices in the field, as well as to assess the extent to which responses to juvenile delinquency align with the purposes of law in terms of legal certainty, justice, and utility. Employing a normative and empirical juridical approach, this research examines relevant legislation, policies, and doctrinal views, and integrates them with case data, national statistics, and field findings at the levels of the police, prosecution, courts, and juvenile correctional institutions. The findings reveal that although, at the normative level, the Juvenile Criminal Justice System has shifted the orientation of law enforcement toward rehabilitation and restorative justice through diversion, its implementation remains constrained by the dominance of a legalistic–repressive approach, limited institutional capacity, inadequate rehabilitation facilities, and weak involvement of families and communities in supporting the social reintegration of children. This study offers a comprehensive mapping of the gap between norms and practice and proposes a more integrated response model that positions restorative justice as an instrument for realizing the purposes of law, by strengthening synergy among law enforcement agencies, promoting character education within families and schools, and advancing state policies oriented toward prevention and comprehensive child protection.   Kenakalan remaja (juvenile delinquency) di Indonesia menunjukkan kecenderungan yang semakin serius dan kompleks, sementara berbagai instrumen hukum dan kebijakan perlindungan anak belum sepenuhnya mampu menekan laju perilaku menyimpang tersebut. Penelitian ini secara spesifik bertujuan menganalisis kesenjangan antara kerangka normatif penegakan hukum terhadap kenakalan remaja. terutama melalui Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dan prinsip keadilan restorative dengan praktik empiris di lapangan, sekaligus menilai sejauh mana penanggulangan kenakalan remaja selaras dengan tujuan hukum berupa kepastian, keadilan, dan kemanfaatan. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan empiris, penelitian ini menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan, kebijakan, dan doktrin terkait, serta memadukannya dengan data kasus, statistik nasional, dan temuan lapangan pada tingkat kepolisian, kejaksaan, pengadilan, serta lembaga pembinaan khusus anak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun secara normatif Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak telah menggeser orientasi penegakan hukum ke arah pembinaan dan keadilan restoratif melalui diversi, implementasinya masih dibatasi oleh dominasi pendekatan legalistik-represif, keterbatasan kapasitas aparat, minimnya sarana pembinaan, serta lemahnya keterlibatan keluarga dan masyarakat dalam mendukung reintegrasi sosial anak. Penelitian ini menawarkan pemetaan komprehensif atas kesenjangan antara norma dan praktik, sekaligus mengusulkan model penanggulangan yang lebih terpadu dengan menempatkan restorative justice sebagai instrumen aktualisasi tujuan hukum, melalui penguatan sinergi antarlembaga penegak hukum, pendidikan karakter di lingkungan keluarga dan sekolah, serta kebijakan negara yang berorientasi pada pencegahan dan perlindungan komprehensif terhadap anak.
Adequacy of Indonesian Cybercriminal Law Against Generative AI-Based Social Engineering Attacks Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang; Diah Pudjiastuti; Sutarjo
Res Nullius Law Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Volume 6 No 1 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Komputer Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34010/rnlj.v6i1.19927

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has significantly amplified the sophistication and scale of social engineering attacks, posing unprecedented challenges to legal systems worldwide, including Indonesia. This article examines whether the existing Indonesian cyber criminal law framework primarily Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE) as amended by Law No. 1 of 2024, along with Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection (UU PDP) and the new Criminal Code (KUHP 2023) is adequate to address AI-driven social engineering attacks such as deepfake-assisted phishing, AI-generated vishing, and automated pretexting schemes. Employing a normative legal research methodology with a comparative approach, this study analyses the applicable legal provisions against the technical characteristics of generative AI-enabled social engineering and compares Indonesia’s regulatory posture with the European Union’s AI Act and the United States’ sector-based frameworks. The findings reveal three critical legislative gaps: the absence of AI-specific criminal provisions, insufficient evidentiary standards for AI-generated content, and inadequate mechanisms for attributing criminal liability in multi-actor AI-mediated offences. This article concludes that Indonesia’s current legal framework is structurally inadequate and recommends the enactment of a dedicated AI Criminal Liability Law and targeted amendments to the UU ITE to incorporate AI-specific definitional, evidentiary, and liability provisions commensurate with the contemporary threat landscape.
Co-Authors Ahdaniah, Aulya Asyipa, Gita Daisy Ade Riany Diem Dayat Hidayat Dea Puspita Pramesti Diah Pudjiastuti Farida Nurfalah, Farida Hanik Liskustyawati, Hanik Happy Ferovina Wuntu Ipah, Ipah Latipah La Ode Bariun Mutiara Noviana Dewi Nurhafizh, Imam Nurruzzaman Puspita, Khairina Rahmawati Ratna Sari Dewi Ria Kurniawati Rifka Noviani Santika Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang Santika, Tika Siti Humairoh, Siti Subagyo Sri Utomo Suminar, Uum Suyaman, Dede Syamsul Huda