Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.607
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Media of Law and Sharia Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Borobudur Law and Society Journal Priviet Social Sciences Journal Juris Humanity: Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Nuansa: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Keagamaan Islam Joong-Ki
Sofian, Muhamad
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Corrective Justice in the Administrative Review of the Appointment of Papua DPRP Members by the Jayapura Administrative Court) Pondayar, Yustus; Budiiman, Eren Arif; Taufani, Galang; Sofian, Muhamad
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 25 No. 2 (2026): Vol. 25 No. 2 (2026): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v25i2.8274

Abstract

This article examines corrective justice in the administrative review of the appointment process for members of the Papuan People’s Representative Council through the Special Autonomy mechanism. The study focuses on Decision Number 12/G/2025/PTUN.JPR, registered at the Jayapura Administrative Court, concerning a dispute over the announcement and work of the Provincial Selection Committee. The central issue is whether a selection committee announcement may be treated as an administrative decision or action that produces legal consequences and can therefore be reviewed by the Administrative Court. This research uses normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The study argues that political affirmation for Indigenous Papuans represents distributive justice, while judicial review by PTUN Jayapura represents corrective justice when the selection process allegedly violates legality, transparency, impartiality, and good governance principles. The article concludes that PTUN Jayapura does not replace the technical discretion of the selection committee but ensures that administrative authority is exercised lawfully, fairly, transparently, and accountably. Corrective justice in this context restores legal order, protects participants’ rights, and strengthens the legitimacy of affirmative representation under Papua’s Special Autonomy framework
Co-Authors Afthon Yazid Bambang Tjatur Iswanto, Bambang Tjatur Budiiman, Eren Arif Camqliew, Raychanezka Whyatta Pembhayoun Maydjaller Dakum, Dakum Eva Papilaya Fadil Mas’ud febriyanti, Nur ilmi putri Fuad Fuad Jaudah, Tsuroyyaa Maitsaa’ Kasiman Munawar, Said Pondayar, Yustus Pramesti, Nadila Putri Puji Sulistyaningsih Putri, Yusniati Andini Rewapatara, Hendrik Rikarsyo Romadhoni, Pratiwi Uly Rusniawati, Rusniawati Tartillah, Baiq Amarwati Taufani, Galang Wahyu Kumala Sari