Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.155
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Akta Maqasid: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam Al - Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir Jurnal Ilmiah Ahwal Syakhshiyyah (JAS) The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam AHKAM : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora ANDREW Law Journal IIJSE Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Turnip, Ibnu Radwan siddik
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Astronomy Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Isu Gender dalam Reformasi Hukum Perkawinan di Negara-Negara Islam Rahman, Tengku Rizki; Heriandi, Heriandi; Turnip, Ibnu Radwan Siddik; Efendi, Rahmad
AHKAM Vol 5 No 1 (2026): AHKAM: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i1.8877

Abstract

Although marriage law reform in Muslim-majority countries has received sustained academic attention, studies that systematically classify reform trajectories based on the interaction between the legitimacy of sharīʿa, state authority, and gender justice remain relatively limited. This study aimed to analyze how Muslim states negotiate women’s rights in Islamic family law through different models of legal reform. Employing a qualitative, historical–comparative approach in legal studies, it examines statutory texts, judicial practice, and law reform policies in selected Muslim-majority jurisdictions. Data were obtained from primary legislation, court decisions, and authoritative secondary literature and were analyzed using comparative legal reasoning and thematic analysis. The findings identify three main reform models. The conservative–traditional model, evident in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and several Gulf states, maintains classical fiqh with minimal state intervention, thereby perpetuating hierarchical gender relations. The moderate–codificatory model, implemented in Egypt, Morocco, Jordan, and Indonesia, selectively modifies fiqh through state codification and judicial oversight, enabling incremental gender reform. The secular–progressive model, as exemplified by Turkey and Tunisia, reconstructs family law by discarding sharīʿa as the basis of state law, abolishing male guardianship, prohibiting polygamy, and institutionalizing more gender-equal forms of divorce. This study concludes that Islamic marriage law reform does not move linearly toward secularization but rather produces a spectrum of normative arrangements shaped by configurations of political authority, interpretive choices in law, and evolving gender discourses. These findings contribute to the development of comparative Islamic law theory and offer policy-relevant implications for the design and implementation of future family law reforms.
Co-Authors Abdul Halim Talli Ananda, Faisar Arminsyah Arminsyah Damanik, Wahda Hilwani Habibie, Azrai Agnil Harmansyah Putra Sitorus Heriandi, Heriandi Ibnu Radwan Siddik Marpaung, Mukhlis Tri Mulya Muhamad Hasan Sebyar Muhammad Zikri Nadilla, Nadilla Ningsih, Suria Nur, Ihzatul Fadhillah Nurhayati Nurhayati Rahmad Efendi Rahman, Tengku Rizki Risyad Fakar Lubis Sumper Mulia Harahap, Sumper Mulia Syifauzzahrah, Syifauzzahrah Tanjung, Dai Robi Tanjung, Rima Rahmayani Wani, Wani