Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2020 - 2025

7.406

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

Prasetya, Rizky Eka

Universitas Budi Luhur

Author-ID : 1869403

Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 56 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Title

Identifying Grammarly Automated Writing Evaluation and Self-Editing by Administrative Officer Rizky Eka Prasetya; Didik Hariyadi Raharjo; Sofiani, Fenti
JELLT (Journal of English Language and Language Teaching) Vol 8 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36597/jellt.v8i1.14153

Automated writing evaluation (AWE) tools have been extensively used in foreign language writing classrooms, and their use has been progressively expanding recently. The study investigates an overview of Grammarly’s Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE). The research employed a quasi-experimental, comparative design with convenience sampling to assess the effects of Grammarly on the automated writing evaluation and self-editing of 56 administrative officers. The findings demonstrate that Grammarly’s AWE editing groups produced many better-written outputs. Grammarly’s AWE editing and self-editing experimental groups outperformed the control groups that did not engage in Grammarly’s AWE software. The level and complexity of the impact articles written by experimental groups are much more significant. The comparison was made between automated and non-automated editing. It demonstrates the existence of a considerable advantage for AWE editing. There were statistically significant changes in favor of the post-test between the pretest and post-test mean scores for both groups. These outcomes may be clarified with the software’s contribution. There is no difference between the experimental groups that are statistically significant. This result corresponds with whether there is a substantial difference in the effects on the writings of Grammarly’s AWE and self-editing experimental groups.

Co-Authors Achmad Syarif Achmad Syarif Agus Sriyanto Alam, Sukma Anindya Putri Pradipta Anwar, Syaiful Didik Hariyadi Raharjo Didik Hariyadi Raharjo Didik Hariyadi Raharjo Elizabeth Elizabeth Etty Susilowati Etty Susilowati Fenti Sofiani Fitriani, Nurul Hakam Ali Niazi Hidayat, Ravindra Safitra Lestari, Setyani Dwi Niazi, Hakam Ali Novanda Alim Setya Nugraha Retno Fuji Oktaviani Rinny Meidiyustiani Saskia Lydiani Setyani Dwi Lestari Suratno, Geri Syaiful Anwar Thoha, M. Nuur Farid Yugi Setyarko Yuwono Yuwono

Title Search

Found 1 Documents Search Journal : JELLT (Journal of English Language and Language Teaching)

Abstract

Title

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : JELLT (Journal of English Language and Language Teaching)