Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.286
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum MAGISTRA Law Review SYARIATI : Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hukum Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik
Idris, Maulana Fahmi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : MAGISTRA Law Review

 1 
TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM PLATFORM DIGITAL ATAS PENYALAHGUNAAN AI DALAM TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK Kossay, Methodius; Idris, Maulana Fahmi
MAGISTRA Law Review Vol 6, No 01 (2025): MAGISTRA Law Review
Publisher : PSHPM Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/malrev.v6i01.5879

Abstract

The implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in electronic transactions has significantly enhanced efficiency and user convenience. However, the misuse of AI by digital platforms and third parties has introduced complex legal challenges, particularly concerning the legal responsibility of digital platforms in protecting consumers from fraud and exploitation. This study aims to analyze Indonesia's regulatory framework regarding the liability of digital platforms for AI misuse in electronic transactions and compare it with regulations in other jurisdictions. Employing a normative legal approach through legislative analysis and case studies, this research reveals that Indonesia's regulatory framework still has gaps in governing algorithmic transparency and platform accountability. A comparative analysis with the regulatory frameworks of the European Union and the United States indicates that stricter regulations can effectively mitigate AI-related risks in digital transactions. Therefore, this study recommends the establishment of more adaptive policies, mandatory algorithmic transparency, and the formation of a specialized regulatory body to ensure responsible AI implementation in electronic transactions
EFEKTIVITAS RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PENYELESAIAN KASUS KRIMINALITAS RINGAN: STUDI KASUS DENGAN METODE STUDI KOMPARATIF Idris, Maulana Fahmi; Kriswandaru, Althea Serafim; Pratiwi, Berliant
MAGISTRA Law Review Vol 6, No 01 (2025): MAGISTRA Law Review
Publisher : PSHPM Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/malrev.v6i01.5888

Abstract

Restorative justice has gained attention as an alternative approach to resolving minor criminal cases, offering a rehabilitative and community-oriented process. In Indonesia, its implementation aims to reduce the judicial burden and promote offender reintegration. However, inconsistencies in application and its effectiveness in reducing recidivism remain concerns. This study evaluates the effectiveness of restorative justice in Indonesia by examining case resolution speed, victim satisfaction, and recidivism rates. Using a comparative study method with qualitative and quantitative approaches, data were collected from legal documents, case studies (2018–2023), and stakeholder interviews. The findings show that cases resolved through restorative justice increased from 500 in 2018 to 2,300 in 2023, reflecting broader adoption. Survey results indicate 70% of victims were satisfied with restorative justice outcomes, compared to 50% in conventional proceedings. The recidivism rate for offenders undergoing restorative justice was 40%, lower than 55% in conventional sentencing but still higher than the Netherlands (65%) and Canada (68%). This study highlights the importance of law enforcement support, victim participation, and community involvement in the success of restorative justice. Strengthening national policies is essential to ensure more consistent and effective implementation. These findings offer valuable insights for policymakers in enhancing restorative justice practices in Indonesia to build a more efficient and rehabilitative criminal justice system.
Co-Authors Amalia Sari, Farida Ariyani, Widya Diva Wulandari, Yesi Ikawati, Linda Karisma, Dian Khasanah, Dian Ratu Ayu Uswatun Kossay, Methodius Kriswandaru, Althea Serafim Laksito, Joni Pratiwi, Berliant Putra, Rengga Kusuma Putri Pratiwi Riskia Putri, Nurlila Ronald Jolly Pongantung Suwardi Waryanto, Agus Widhiati, Greget