Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Euforia Kolektif dan Kriminalitas Situasional: Studi Kriminologi Budaya Dalam Acara Joget di Kecamatan Sampolowa Kabupaten Buton Selatan Jofir, Jofir; Mpesau, Alasman; Rahim, Abdul Jabar; Ruslan, Ruslan
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i3.7957

Abstract

Kriminalitas dalam ruang tradisi adat Kecamatan Sampolawa, Kabupaten Buton Selatan merupakan fenomena berulang yang tidak dapat dilepaskan dari dinamika budaya lokal. Tradisi joget yang seharusnya menjadi arena euforia kolektif dan pertukaran simbolik justru kerap berubah menjadi ruang lahirnya tindak kekerasan situasional. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pola kriminalitas dalam acara joget serta mengkaji respons masyarakat melalui mekanisme penyelesaian berbasis adat. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum empiris-normatif yang mengintegrasikan analisis bahan hukum primer dan sekunder mencakup peraturan perundang-undangan, hukum adat, jurnal, dan literatur kriminologi dengan data lapangan berupa wawancara mendalam dan observasi langsung. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tindak kriminal yang terjadi merupakan produk interaksi antara euforia kolektif, konsumsi alkohol, anonimitas sosial, dan melemahnya kontrol sosial informal. Data Polsek Sampolawa mencatat 51 kasus kriminal periode 2021-2026, dengan pola fluktuatif yang berkorelasi dengan intensitas penyelenggaraan acara joget. Masyarakat lebih memilih penyelesaian melalui musyawarah adat sebagai wujud keadilan restoratif lokal yang menekankan pemulihan harmoni sosial. Studi ini menegaskan pentingnya pendekatan integratif yang memadukan hukum positif dengan kearifan budaya lokal dalam penanganan kriminalitas berbasis konteks.
IMPLICATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT'S DECISION ON THE SEPARATION OF NATIONAL AND LOCAL ELECTIONS FOR INDONESIAN ELECTION LAW POLITICS Alasman Mpesau; Ruslan
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20322944

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 separates national and local elections with a specific time interval, having implications for the Indonesian electoral system and electoral law policy. This study aims to normatively analyze the impact of this decision on the principle of election simultaneity, transition of terms of office, and future electoral law design. The method used is normative legal research with a legislative approach, case studies, conceptual and comparative studies of the democratic transitions of Germany and South Africa. The results show that Constitutional Court Decision 135 reflects the approach of judicial activism and living constitution, and does not conflict with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This separation of elections requires legal reform through harmonization of the Election Law and Regional Elections with an Omnibus Law approach. In addition, it is necessary to refine the electoral system towards a mixed-member proportional model to be more representative and democratic. This decision is an important foundation for reforming electoral law politics that is constitutional, adaptive, and responsive to the dynamics of Indonesian democracy.
Keadilan Pemilu Dalam Penanganan Bawaslu Sulawesi Tenggara Laporan Ijazah Palsu Calon Legislatif Kota Kendari Mpesau, Alasman; Ruslan, Ruslan; Rosidin, Ayib
Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): August, Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH)
Publisher : LP3M, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51454/jimsh.v8i2.1648

Abstract

This study examines the handling of reports concerning the use of a fake diploma by a legislative candidate in Kendari City by the Election Supervisory Agency of Southeast Sulawesi (Bawaslu Sultra), which concluded that the case did not fulfill the elements of an electoral crime, despite official evidence from the Ministry of Education stating that the reported individual was not registered as a National Examination participant. This finding contrasts with the investigation conducted by the Kendari City Police, which designated the reported individual as a suspect in a general criminal offense. The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of the electoral justice system by Bawaslu Sultra in handling electoral criminal violations and to examine whether the process reflects the principles of electoral justice. This research employs an empirical normative method using statutory, conceptual, and field investigation approaches. The findings indicate that the electoral justice system within Bawaslu Sultra functioned procedurally; however, the outcome did not reflect substantive justice. The dominance of Bawaslu within the Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Sentra Gakkumdu), without the active involvement of the Police and the Prosecutor’s Office in plenary decision-making, creates potential opportunities for abuse of authority by Bawaslu. Therefore, future enforcement of electoral criminal law should strengthen the role of the Police in investigations through more functional cooperation within Sentra Gakkumdu.