Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : LEGAL BRIEF

The Land Legal System in Indonesia and Land Rights According to the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) Sugina Hidayanti; Indra Koswara; Yopie Gunawan
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 1 (2021): Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (788.844 KB)

Abstract

After the enactment of Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian Principles, this article aims to explain the Indonesian agrarian law system. The law focuses on the unification of agrarian regulations in Indonesia in order to create a unified agrarian legal system. The Agrarian Principle must highlight that all people have access to their lands in order to secure their happiness and prosperity, as well as to ensure that the people are treated fairly. According to Article 6 of the law, every piece of land must serve a social purpose, namely, to generate goods for the people. This article also seeks to determine if the Agrarian Principles have provided individuals, the state, and members of customary law with legal clarity over certain land rights.
Criminal Liability Using Forged Letters Judging From Article 263 Paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code Durahman Manurung; Nandang Sambas; Indra Yudha Koswara
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022): Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (850.512 KB)

Abstract

Forging phoney letters is a crime that has ramifications for the truth and people's faith in one another. Perpetrators use fake notes to make money. To establish the victim's signature forging as a foundation for conducting an investigation and investigation of letter fabrication, the victim must report to the police. The following issues are investigated: Users of counterfeit letters are subject to criminal culpability under article 263 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code, which deals with letter falsification. The research method used was normative juridical research with direct interviews with Semarang Police Satreskrim investigators who handle letter forgery cases. Researchers took case examples regarding letter falsification, based on the Semarang District Court Number: 636/Pid.Sus/2016/PN. SMG with the defendant named NURCAHYA ARIESETIAWAN bin (late) AMANTJIK AGUS was found legally and convincingly guilty by considering that the Judge believed that.