Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

Penyuluhan Dan Konsultasi Hukum Tentang Pencegahan Dan Penanganan Kasus Kekerasan Seksual Di SMA Muhammadiyah Kota Kupang A. Resopijani; Simplexius Asa; Reny R Masu; Windasari N Sudiarta; Rizal S. Thene; Daud Yaferson Dollu; Kornelia Melasari; Petrus Merio Mamoh
KADARKUM: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Juni
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/d0z72427

Abstract

Sexual violence is a serious human rights violation that significantly affects children and adolescents who are still in their developmental stages. Schools, as spaces for education and character building, can unfortunately become locations where sexual violence occurs—whether verbal, physical, or digital. Therefore, legal education is essential to prevent and respond to such cases. In this context, the Faculty of Law of Universitas Nusa Cendana conducted a legal outreach program at SMA Muhammadiyah Kupang to enhance students’, teachers’, and staff’s understanding of sexual violence prevention and handling. The material was delivered in a panel format by experts in Procedural Law through lectures, discussions, Q &A sessions, and case studies. Participants were also given the opportunity to consult on past or ongoing issues, with a restorative justice approach offered as an alternative mechanism focused on victim recovery. The activity strengthened participants’ knowledge of Law No. 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Crimes and Law No. 35 of 2014 on Child Protection. Students and teachers showed strong enthusiasm, demonstrated by their active engagement throughout the session. They reported gaining clearer guidance on identifying, preventing, and addressing sexual violence in schools. This program proved highly beneficial and is expected to be continued in other schools to broaden legal awareness and strengthen community protection. Keywords: Sexual Violence; Socialization; Adolescents; Prevention;
Implementasi Proses Peradilan Melalui E-Court dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Kefamenanu Kelas II Leltakaeb, Benediktha Marice; Asa, Simplexius; Resopijani, A.
AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis
Publisher : Perhimpunan Sarjana Ekonomi dan Bisnis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37481/jmh.v6i1.1826

Abstract

The digital change in Indonesia's court system has led to the use of electronic court services, known as e-court, to make the legal process more efficient, open, and easier to access. This study looks at two main questions: (1) how the e-court system is used to handle civil cases at the Kefamenanu District Court Class II, and (2) what difficulties come up during its use. The goal of this research is to check how well e-court is working and to find out both technical and non-technical problems faced by the court and the people using it. The research uses a legal method that combines looking at laws with real data collected from the field. Information was gathered directly through conversations with judges, court workers, lawyers, and people who use the courts. Other information came from books and legal rules. The data was studied using a method that describes what is found in detail. The results show that the e-court system at the Kefamenanu District Court Class II is mostly being used as it should, following the Supreme Court's rules from 2022, and helps make the court system simpler, faster, and cheaper. However, there are still some problems, like poor internet connections, system issues, and not enough knowledge of digital tools among the public. These results show that even though e-court makes handling civil cases more efficient, there is still a need to improve the system and help people better understand how to use it.
Keabsahan Alat Bukti Petunjuk dalam Sistem Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Perpajakan (Studi Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2239 K/PID.SUS/2012) Solu, Bintang Putra Choy Kent; Asa, Simplexius; Dollu, Daud Yaferson
RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Februari - April
Publisher : Prodi Bisnis Digital Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/riggs.v5i1.8126

Abstract

Sistem pembuktian dalam hukum acara pidana Indonesia menganut sistem pembuktian menurut undang-undang secara negatif, yaitu hakim hanya dapat menjatuhkan pidana apabila terdapat sekurang-kurangnya dua alat bukti sah disertai keyakinan hakim. Salah satu alat bukti yang diakui adalah alat bukti petunjuk, yang bersifat tidak langsung karena dibentuk dari persesuaian fakta yang berasal dari alat bukti lain. Dalam praktik peradilan modern, khususnya pada tindak pidana perpajakan sebagai kejahatan kerah putih yang kompleks dan berbasis dokumen, alat bukti petunjuk menjadi penting karena pembuktian jarang didasarkan pada bukti langsung atau pengakuan terdakwa. Permasalahan mengenai batas keabsahan alat bukti petunjuk tampak dalam perkara perpajakan yang diputus oleh Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 2239 K/Pid.Sus/2012 yang melibatkan manajer pajak pada Asian Agri Group. Putusan tersebut menunjukkan bahwa rekayasa dokumen, transaksi, serta kebijakan perusahaan dapat dijadikan rangkaian petunjuk untuk membuktikan unsur kesengajaan pidana. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kedudukan dan keabsahan alat bukti petunjuk dalam pembuktian tindak pidana perpajakan serta mengkaji batas yuridis penggunaannya agar tetap sejalan dengan asas kepastian hukum dan keadilan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus, menggunakan data sekunder berupa peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur hukum, serta putusan pengadilan. Data dikumpulkan melalui studi kepustakaan dan dianalisis secara kualitatif normatif dengan menafsirkan norma hukum, membandingkan teori dengan praktik peradilan, serta menarik kesimpulan secara deduktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa alat bukti petunjuk memiliki kedudukan yang sah dan strategis dalam sistem pembuktian pidana, terutama untuk membuktikan unsur kesengajaan dalam tindak pidana perpajakan.
Proses Penyelesaian Kenetu Bewoten Terhadap Pihak-Pihak Yang Bersengketa Menurut Adat Lamaholot Adonara Flores Timur Raya, Rahmat Lebu; Asa, Simplexius; Lewokeda, Kornelia Melansari
Artemis Law Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2026): Artemis Law Journal Vol.3, No.2, May 2026
Publisher : Law Faculty, Nusa Cendana University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35508/alj.v3i2.22369

Abstract

Dispute resolution is not solely conducted through the state's formal legal channels, but is more often settled through customary mechanisms that prioritize family values and social balance. This study aims to understand and analyze the dispute resolution process according to Lamaholot customary law, the role of traditional leaders in resolving disputes, as well as the relevance and effectiveness of such customary law in the context of modern society. This research employs a qualitative method with a juridical-sociological approach. Data were obtained through literature review, in-depth interviews with traditional leaders and local community members, as well as direct observation of customary dispute resolution practices in accordance with Lamaholot traditions. The findings reveal that dispute resolution under Lamaholot customary law involves stages such as family deliberations, customary meetings, and ultimately, traditional peace rituals. The process is aimed at restoring social harmony and preserving the dignity of the disputing parties. It not only resolves the issues materially, but also addresses them morally and spiritually. The study concludes that Lamaholot customary law still holds strong normative authority and can coexist with the national legal system in resolving disputes. This customary law reflects local wisdom that must be preserved, maintained, and integrated into the development of an inclusive national legal system rooted in the cultural values of the community.
MEKANISME PEMISAHAN PERKARA (SPLITSING) OLEH JAKSA PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM PROSES PEMBUKTIAN OLEH SAKSI MAHKOTA Lobo, Martina Nencylia Riwu; Asa, Simplexius; Resopijani, A
Petitum Law Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2026): Petitum Law Journal Volume 3, Nomor 2, Mei 2026
Publisher : Petitum Law Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35508/pelana.v3i2.22776

Abstract

This research examines the mechanism of case splitting (splitsing) by the Public Prosecutor and the use of the crown witness (kroon getuige) in the Indonesian criminal justice system. Splitsing is the prosecutor's authority under Article 142 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Code of Criminal Procedure) to split a single case file with multiple suspects into separate prosecutions. This practice is commonly applied in cases of criminal participation (deelneming) or when there is a lack of evidence, particularly witnesses, to facilitate the evidentiary process. The main consequence of splitsing is the emergence of a crown witness, where one defendant is made a witness to provide testimony against another defendant. This term is not explicitly regulated in the Code of Criminal Procedure, but its existence is recognized in judicial practice and supported by Supreme Court jurisprudence. Although considered effective, the use of a crown witness is highly controversial as it is deemed to conflict with human rights and fundamental legal principles. This includes violations of the right against self-incrimination and the principle of a speedy, simple, and low-cost trial. Juridically, a crown witness's testimony can be considered valid evidence if delivered under oath in court. However, its evidentiary strength is discretionary and depends entirely on the judge's assessment and conviction, and it must be supported by other valid evidence.