Ida Bagus Rai Adnyana
Program Studi Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Udayana

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

MANAJEMEN RISIKO DALAM PROSES ESTIMASI BIAYA PADA PROYEK KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG BERTINGKAT DI KOTA DENPASAR Ida Ayu Praniti Tresna Putri; I N. Norken; I B. Rai Adnyana
JURNAL SPEKTRAN Vol 4 No 2 (2016): Vol. 4, No. 2, Juli 2016
Publisher : Master of Civil Engineering Program Study, Faculty of Engineering, Udayana University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (415.894 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/SPEKTRAN.2016.v04.i02.p08

Abstract

Abstract : On the implementation of the construction project, financing is the main consideration due to the number of large and vulnerable to various risks. Cost control is the beginning of the estimates. An inaccurate estimation could have a negative impact on the whole process of construction. Because of estimation is reference in preparing the budget and used as control of the cost of projects, then required to major risk analysis that can be used as a basis in the mitigation. This research was conducted with qualitative descriptive method by interviews and survey. Data was collected by distributing questionnaires to the respondents using purposive sampling method, which simply selecting respondents who were competent and expert about the possible risks. The number of respondents was 25 who represent 8 construction project belonging to the government which is located in Denpasar. The results showed that there were 40 risks identified, from literature identified 16 risks and from brainstorming identified 24 risks. Than from 40 risks there are 34 major risks which was 9 risks classified as unacceptable and 25 risks classified as undesirable. Most dominant risks were the risks of estimator team and project. There were 16 mitigation measures at an unacceptable risk and 41 mitigitation measures at an undesirable risk. Most dominant risks were the risks of contractors and owner.
KAJIAN METODE SISTEM NILAI UNTUK MENGEVALUASI PENGADAAN JASA KONSTRUKSI I B. Putu Bintana; I G. A. Adnyana Putera; I B. Rai Adnyana
JURNAL SPEKTRAN Vol. 3, No. 1, Januari 2015
Publisher : Master of Civil Engineering Program Study, Faculty of Engineering, Udayana University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (320.496 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/SPEKTRAN.2015.v03.i01.p09

Abstract

Abstract: The construction procurement evaluation method using lowest price conforming methods often causes some quality problems forĀ  owners and increases the probability of dispute and delay during the contract execution. On the other hand, merit point system evaluation method can provide quality assurance, but the procurement committees are often dificult to apply it, and to determaine mesurable criteria evaluation.Therefore, it is necessary for a more in-depth study to find out the criteria evaluation for construction procurement. The research conducted in Bali, and adopted inductive qualitative approach involving 45 experts participated in construction procurements using merit point system evaluation.Puposive sampling is applied to determine the respondents come from all actors included during procurement process. The data was collected through interviews, observation participant and questionnaires, and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is choosed to analyse them. The result shows that : the merit point system evaluation for construction procurement can determine the contractor provides better quality than the lowest price conforming method when theevaluation criteria are clear, mesurable and transparant in the bidding document. There are two principle aspects that must be considered to assurethe quality that is: the technical aspect and the cost that weight consecutively 60% and 40%. The technical aspect comprises of : a) the existance of work plan (13.51%), comprising of construction methods (4.12%), supportingĀ  equipment (4.05%), supporting material (3.46%), suporting workers (1.88%); b) competencies of human recources (19.91%), comprising of project management competencies(2.31%), existence of expert (7.92%) and certificated human resources (9.68%); c) existence of supporting equipments (15.54%) consisted of lifting support (4.79%), transportation support (6.17%), surveying support equipment(4.58%); d) the existing of time management (6.30%) consisted of network planning (4.13%), bar chart (1.03%), and S-curve (1.14%); and e) existence of quality assurance (2.14%) consisted of quality management system (1.95%), performance quality management (0.66%) and material management quality (2.14%). From price point of view, it must be evaluated the faireness of price and price offer that weighs consecutively 25.66% and 14.34%.