Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Proceeding of International Conference Health, Science And Technology (ICOHETECH) ACCELERATION: Multidisciplinary Research Journal
MARGININGSIH
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
SOCIALLY CONSTRUCTED DEATH IN SHIRLEY JACKSON’S THE LOTTERY Winarti; Hidayatulloh, Aris; SM, Syafrianto; Marginingsih; Setiawati, Beta; Wardhani, Evi Murti
Acceleration: Multidisciplinary Research Journal Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Acceleration: Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Publisher : PT Akselerasi Karya Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70210/amrj.v3i2.140

Abstract

Death as a literary theme has long served as a reflection on life, existence, and cultural values. This study investigates how social traditions legitimize inherited violence in Shirley Jackson's The Lottery, arguing that the story represents death not as a natural or inevitable occurrence, but as a culturally sanctioned and ideologically constructed event. Employing a qualitative content analysis grounded in structuralist and deconstructive theory, the research examines how meaning is produced through recurring symbols—the black box, stones, and ritual—revealing the mechanisms by which violence becomes normalized within communal structures. By integrating structuralist attention to narrative systems with deconstruction’s critique of fixed meaning, this study contributes to literary scholarship by demonstrating how Jackson’s story functions as a critique of social complicity and ritualized violence. Theoretically, the paper advances discussions on the intersection of ideology, tradition, and power in literary representations of death, offering insights into how fiction can expose the constructed nature of social norms and the ethical consequences of collective obedience.
NEGOTIATING POWER AND IDENTITY THROUGH CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURES: CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION OF THE MAIN CHARACTERS IN PURPLE HEARTS MOVIE Ayiz, Abdul; Carreon, Jonathan Rante; Marginingsih; Yanottama, Fourica
Proceeding of the International Conference Health, Science And Technology (ICOHETECH) 2025: Proceeding of the 6th International Conference Health, Science And Technology (ICOHETECH)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47701/3vqnnr38

Abstract

In everyday communication, speakers often rely on indirect expressions whose meanings must be inferred from context, making conversational implicatures a key element in understanding how language functions beyond its literal form. This study investigates how conversational implicatures function as tools for negotiating power and identity in cross-cultural communication, as portrayed by the main characters in Elizabeth Allen Rosenbaum’s Purple Hearts (2022). Guided by a sociopragmatics perspective, the research examines how implicit meanings in dialogue both reflect and shape interpersonal dynamics between Cassandra Salazar, a liberal musician, and Luke Morrow, a conservative U.S. Marine. The study employed a descriptive qualitative method with an ethnographic approach, analyzing 56 utterances drawn from the film’s subtitles. Findings reveal that particularized conversational implicatures (PCI) are the most dominant type, followed by generalized conversational implicatures (GCI) and scalar implicatures (SI). These implicatures serve not only to convey hidden meanings but also to express sarcasm, resistance, politeness, vulnerability, and emotional tension. The results demonstrate that implicatures are central to power relations, with Luke often using them to subtly assert institutional authority, while Cassandra employs them as acts of resistance and identity assertion. Over time, their communication shifts from conflict to adaptation, showing how cultural differences—liberal versus conservative worldviews, expressive versus restrained styles—both complicate and enrich cross-cultural interactions. This study contributes to sociopragmatics research by highlighting how cinematic discourse embodies ideological conflicts and identity negotiation, and how conversational implicatures facilitate cultural convergence in cross-cultural relationships.
Co-Authors Abdul Ayiz beta setiawati Carreon, Jonathan Rante Hidayatulloh, Aris SM, Syafrianto Wardhani, Evi Murti Winarti Yanottama, Fourica