Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : jpled

PENGARUH KEPERCAYAAN DIRI, KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL, LINGKUNGAN KELUARGA, DAN LINGKUNGAN SEKOLAH TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR SISWA MELALUI DISIPLIN BELAJAR SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING KELAS XI/FASE F PADA MATA PELAJARAN EKONOMI DI SMA NEGERI 5 PADANG Desparni, Antika; Desi Areva; Dina Amaluis
Journal of Practice Learning and Educational Development Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Practice Learning and Educational Development (JPLED)
Publisher : Global Action and Education for Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58737/jpled.v6i1.806

Abstract

This study aims to determine the influence of self-confidence, emotional intelligence, family environment, and school environment on students’ academic achievement through learning discipline as an intervening variable in Grade XI/Phase F Economics subject at SMA Negeri 5 Padang. This type of research is associative. The population in this study consisted of 79 Grade XI/Phase F students in the Economics subject at SMA Negeri 5 Padang. The sampling technique used was stratified random sampling. The results of this study show that:1) There is a significant influence of self-confidence on learning discipline, indicated by a path coefficient value of 0.226. This coefficient is significant because the t-count value of 2.417 > t-table 1.66437 with a significance value of 0.018 < α = 0.05. This means H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. 2) There is a significant influence of emotional intelligence on learning discipline, indicated by a path coefficient value of 0.278. This coefficient is significant because the t-count value of 2.975 > t-table 1.66437 with a significance value of 0.004 < α = 0.05. This means H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. 3) There is a significant influence of the family environment on learning discipline, indicated by a path coefficient value of 0.414. This coefficient is significant because the t-count value of 4.414 > t-table 1.66437 with a significance value of 0.000 < α = 0.05. This means H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. 4) There is a significant influence of the school environment on learning discipline, indicated by a path coefficient value of 0.278. This coefficient is significant because the t-count value of 2.968 > t-table 1.66437 with a significance value of 0.004 < α = 0.05. This means H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. 5) There is a significant influence of learning discipline on academic achievement, indicated by a path coefficient value of 0.322. This coefficient is significant because the t-count value of 11.429 > t-table 1.66437 with a significance value of 0.000 < α = 0.05. This means H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. 6) There is a significant influence of self-confidence on academic achievement, indicated by a path coefficient value of 0.370. This coefficient is significant because the t-count value of 15.741 > t-table 1.66437 with a significance value of 0.000 < α = 0.05. This means H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. 7) There is a significant influence of emotional intelligence on academic achievement, indicated by a path coefficient value of 0.381. This coefficient is significant because the t-count value of 15.943 > t-table 1.66437 with a significance value of 0.000 < α = 0.05. This means H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. 8) There is a significant influence of the family environment on academic achievement, indicated by a path coefficient value of 0.410. This coefficient is significant because the t-count value of 16.077 > t-table 1.66437 with a significance value of 0.000 < α = 0.05. This means H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. 9) There is a significant influence of the school environment on academic achievement, indicated by a path coefficient value of 0.396. This coefficient is significant because the t-count value of 16.501 > t-table 1.66437 with a significance value of 0.000 < α = 0.05. This means H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted.
The Influence of Learning Styles, Learning Independence, Family Support, and School Environment on Academic Achievement with Learning Motivation as a Moderating Variable in 11th Grade/Fase F Economics Students Muthia Uswatun Nisa; Desi Areva; Vivina Eprillison
Journal of Practice Learning and Educational Development Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Practice Learning and Educational Development (JPLED)
Publisher : Global Action and Education for Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58737/jpled.v6i1.807

Abstract

This study aims to determine: 1) The influence of learning styles on student achievement at SMA N 13 Padang, 2) The influence of learning independence on student achievement, 3) The influence of family support on student achievement, 4) The influence of the school environment on student achievement, 5) Learning motivation strengthens the influence of learning styles on student achievement, 6) Learning motivation strengthens the influence of learning independence on student achievement, 7) Learning motivation strengthens the influence of family support on student achievement, 8) Learning motivation strengthens the influence of the school environment on student achievement.This type of research is quantitative. The population in this study were all 11th-grade students studying economics at SMA Negeri 13 Padang. Sampling used a stratified random sampling technique. The instrument used for the study was a closed questionnaire with Multiple Linear Regression test using SPSS software version 25.The results of the study showed that: 1) There is an influence between learning styles (X1) on learning achievement (Y) of class XI/F Phase students at SMA Negeri 13 Padang. For the regression coefficient value of the learning style variable (X1) of 0.239 which is positive with a calculated t value of 4.887> t table of 1.997 with a significant value of 0.000 <α = 0.05, 2) There is an influence between learning independence (X2) on learning achievement (Y) of class XI/F Phase. For the regression coefficient value of the learning independence variable (X2) of 0.454 which is positive with a calculated t value of 7.415> t table of 1.997 with a significant value of 0.000 <α = 0.05. 3) There is an influence between family support (X3) on the learning achievement (Y) of class XI/Phase F students (X3) of 0.135 which is positive with a calculated t value of 2.459> t table of 1.997 with a significant value of 0.017<α = 0.05. 4) There is an influence between the school environment (X4) on the learning achievement (X5) of class XI/Phase F students. For the regression coefficient value of the school environment variable (X4) of 0.064 which is positive with a calculated t value of 2.738> t table of 1.997 with a significant value of 0.008 <α = 0.05. 5) Learning motivation strengthens learning styles on the learning achievement of class XI/Phase F students. This can be seen from the results of data analysis, the R Square (R2) value in model II is greater than R2 model 1 (0.560>0.495). 6) Learning motivation strengthens learning independence and student achievement. This is evident from the data analysis, which shows that the R2 value in Model II is greater than the R2 value in Model 1 (0.704>0.630). 7) Learning motivation strengthens family support for student achievement in grade 1. This is evident from the data analysis, which shows that the R2 value in Model II is greater than the R2 value in Model 1 (0.394>0.391). 8) Learning motivation strengthens the school environment for student achievement in Grade 11/Phase F. This is evident from the data analysis, which shows that the R2 value in Model II is greater than the R2 value in Model 1 (0.527>0.525).
The Influence of Study Habits, Digital Literacy, Critical Thinking Skills, Teacher Competence, and the Implementation of Moving Class Learning on the Learning Achievement of 11th Grade Students in Economics Subjects Rega Oktavia; Desi Areva; Mona Amelia
Journal of Practice Learning and Educational Development Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Practice Learning and Educational Development (JPLED)
Publisher : Global Action and Education for Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58737/jpled.v6i1.814

Abstract

This study aims to determine: (1) the effect of study habits on learning achievement, (2) the effect of digital literacy on learning achievement, (3) the effect of critical thinking skills on learning achievement, (4) the effect of teacher competence on learning achievement, (5) the effect of the implementation of moving class learning on learning achievement, and (6) the joint effect of study habits, digital literacy, critical thinking skills, teacher competence, and the implementation of moving class learning on learning achievement. The population of this study consisted of grade XI students of SMA N 1 Lembah Gumanti enrolled in economics learning. The sampling technique used was stratified random sampling, with a total sample of 102 students. Data were collected through questionnaires that had been tested for validity and reliability, as well as student achievement documentation. Data analysis was conducted using multiple linear regression, along with t-tests and F-tests, with the aid of SPSS and Eviews software. The results of the study show that: (1) study habits have a significant effect on economics learning achievement, with a coefficient value of 0.155 and a significance level of 0.000 < 0.05, with stronger effects on students from low-income families; (2) digital literacy significantly affects economics learning achievement, with a coefficient of 0.284 and a significance level of 0.000 < 0.05, with stronger effects on students from high-income families; (3) critical thinking skills show a significant effect, with a coefficient of 0.240 and a significance level of 0.000 < 0.05, being more dominant among students from high-income families; (4) teacher competence also significantly influences economics learning achievement, with a coefficient of 0.240 and a significance level of 0.000 < 0.05, where perceptions of teacher competence have greater effects on students from high-income families; (5) the implementation of moving class learning has a significant effect, with a coefficient of 0.112 and a significance level of 0.036 < 0.05, with stronger effects on students from high-income families; and (6) study habits, digital literacy, critical thinking skills, teacher competence, and the implementation of moving class learning jointly have a significant effect on learning achievement, with an F-value of 9.032 > F-table value of 2.52 and a significance level of 0.000 < 0.05. This indicates that Ha is accepted and H0 is rejected.