Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.953
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Cita Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Hasanuddin Law Review Indonesia Private Law Review Jurnal Hukum Islam SASI Journal of Law and Legal Reform JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Rajamanickam, Ramalinggam
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Hasanuddin Law Review

 1 
Legal Framework for Authenticity of Blockchain Electronic Evidence in China: Under a Comparative Law Perspective Chen, Siqi; Rajamanickam, Ramalinggam; Manap, Nazura Abdul
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 10 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v10i3.5638

Abstract

This article analyses the attitudes of various courts towards blockchain electronic evidence and the inconsistent conclusions on its authenticity in China’s judicial practice. The purpose of this article is to explore the rules for determining the authenticity of blockchain electronic evidence that are suitable for China’s reality. This article adopts a qualitative approach to analyse the rules for determining the authenticity of blockchain electronic evidence in China, and identifies the problems faced when reviewing the authenticity of blockchain electronic evidence in Chinese judicial practice. Finally, by comparing and learning from the U.S. rules for determining the authenticity of blockchain electronic evidence, this article puts forward proposals for establishing the best evidence rule and the hearsay rule for blockchain electronic evidence, refining the rules for judicial presumptions as well as explicitly reviewing the authenticity of the electronic evidence prior to uploading it to the blockchain.
Academic Misconduct Responsibilities: An Empirical Comparison Using 35 Chinese Cases as a Foundation Cao, Wenze; Cao, Zhaoxun; Rajamanickam, Ramalinggam; Dahlan, Nur Khalidah
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 11 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v11i1.5696

Abstract

This article undertakes a comprehensive exploration of academic misconduct by employing a robust comparative and empirical approach. It meticulously examines 35 representative cases from China, delving into the diverse manifestations of academic misconduct such as fund project evaluation interference, fraud, paper trading, improper authorship, and multiple submissions. Through in-depth legal analysis, it not only investigates the infringements on intellectual property rights and public legal interests but also proposes the application of strict liability in tort law. To enhance the regulatory framework, the article advocates for clearer criminalization criteria for severe academic misconduct. It further extends the discussion to incorporate the roles of academic institutions, the challenges in enforcement, and a more expansive legal framework. By drawing on international experiences and best practices, it formulates comprehensive and actionable suggestions for reforming China's academic misconduct regulations, aiming to address this issue effectively on both national and international levels.
Academic Misconduct Responsibilities: An Empirical Comparison Using 35 Chinese Cases as a Foundation Cao, Wenze; Cao, Zhaoxun; Rajamanickam, Ramalinggam; Dahlan, Nur Khalidah
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 11 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v11i1.5696

Abstract

This article undertakes a comprehensive exploration of academic misconduct by employing a robust comparative and empirical approach. It meticulously examines 35 representative cases from China, delving into the diverse manifestations of academic misconduct such as fund project evaluation interference, fraud, paper trading, improper authorship, and multiple submissions. Through in-depth legal analysis, it not only investigates the infringements on intellectual property rights and public legal interests but also proposes the application of strict liability in tort law. To enhance the regulatory framework, the article advocates for clearer criminalization criteria for severe academic misconduct. It further extends the discussion to incorporate the roles of academic institutions, the challenges in enforcement, and a more expansive legal framework. By drawing on international experiences and best practices, it formulates comprehensive and actionable suggestions for reforming China's academic misconduct regulations, aiming to address this issue effectively on both national and international levels.
Legal Framework for Authenticity of Blockchain Electronic Evidence in China: Under a Comparative Law Perspective Chen, Siqi; Rajamanickam, Ramalinggam; Manap, Nazura Abdul
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 10 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v10i3.5638

Abstract

This article analyses the attitudes of various courts towards blockchain electronic evidence and the inconsistent conclusions on its authenticity in China’s judicial practice. The purpose of this article is to explore the rules for determining the authenticity of blockchain electronic evidence that are suitable for China’s reality. This article adopts a qualitative approach to analyse the rules for determining the authenticity of blockchain electronic evidence in China, and identifies the problems faced when reviewing the authenticity of blockchain electronic evidence in Chinese judicial practice. Finally, by comparing and learning from the U.S. rules for determining the authenticity of blockchain electronic evidence, this article puts forward proposals for establishing the best evidence rule and the hearsay rule for blockchain electronic evidence, refining the rules for judicial presumptions as well as explicitly reviewing the authenticity of the electronic evidence prior to uploading it to the blockchain.
Co-Authors Abdul Madjid Anita Afriana Cao, Wenze Cao, Zhaoxun Chen, Siqi Dahlan, Nur Khalidah Dede Kania Dede Kania, Dede Kania Efa Laela Fakhirah, Efa Laela Efa Laela Fakhriah Elisatris Gultom Endeh Suhartini Hazar Kusmayanti, Hazar Jan, Naseem Lastuti Abubakar Madiha Dzakiyyah Chairunnisa, Madiha Dzakiyyah Chairunnisa Masykur, Mohammad Hamidi Nazura Abdul Manap Prija Djatmika, Prija Rahman, Wahbi Ramadanni, Manisha Sherly Ayuna Putri Sudarsono Sulastri, Dewi Zahir, Mohd Zamre Mohd