Articles
<![CDATA[The Justice for Illegitimate Children of Indonesian Women Workers Through Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 ]]>
<![CDATA[Kusmayanti, Hazar]]>;
<![CDATA[Kania, Dede]]>;
<![CDATA[Rajamanickam, Ramalinggam]]>;
<![CDATA[Masykur, Mohammad Hamidi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 2: August 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29303/ius.v11i2.1228
<![CDATA[The position of children out of marriage in everyday life by some people is seen as low, on the other hand in terms of welfare and civil rights still get limitations. This research focuses on the implementation of Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/ PUU-VIII /2010 on illegitimate children of Indonesian Women Workers. The research confirmed that the addition of Article 43 paragraph (1) made by the Constitutional Court through Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 is not only limited to the right to protection but has a very broad meaning that also includes illegitimate children born to Indonesian Women Workers. In accordance with the principle of equality before the law, the law must provide fair protection and legal certainty. The findings of this study revealed that illegitimate children of migrant workers can obtain constitutional rights as Indonesian citizens adhering to the principles of the rule of law. Therefore, the Constitutional Court’s decision does not only affect children’s inheritance rights, but also has implications for guaranteeing and protecting illegitimate children born to migrant workers, such as the right to earn a living, guardianship rights, and the right to get child support from a biological father.]]>
<![CDATA[The Legal Position of the Use of Blockchain Technology on the Validity of Stamp Duty in the Digital Age ]]>
<![CDATA[Ariani, Relys Sandi]]>;
<![CDATA[Setia Negara, Tunggul Anshari]]>;
<![CDATA[Masykur, Mohammad Hamidi]]>
<![CDATA[ NEGREI: Academic Journal of Law and Governance Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29240/negrei.v4i1.10294
<![CDATA[The integration of blockchain technology in stamp duty administration requires a clear legal framework to ensure effective implementation. This study evaluates the benefits and challenges of using blockchain in stamp duty imposition and provides regulatory framework recommendations. Using a normative legal approach and analysis of relevant legislation, the research shows that blockchain can significantly enhance efficiency, transparency, and security in the stamp duty process. The immutable nature of blockchain records ensures data integrity and reduces the risk of fraud. Moreover, smart contracts can automate and streamline the transaction process, minimizing human error. However, the adoption of blockchain faces challenges such as high initial costs and the need for regulatory adjustments. In conclusion, the adoption of blockchain in stamp duty administration necessitates comprehensive regulations to ensure the legality and validity of recorded transactions, providing a robust and reliable tax system for the digital age.]]>
<![CDATA[Absentee Land Ownership: Problem or Solution for Indonesia Farmers ]]>
<![CDATA[perkasa, surya rimba]]>;
<![CDATA[Koeswahyono, Imam]]>;
<![CDATA[Masykur, Mohammad Hamidi]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): November, 2024 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v4i3.36282
<![CDATA[Food Resilience is a critical aspect of national sustainability programs. Indonesia has a large and diverse population necessitates prioritizing food resilience as a primary focus of government programs. Food security can be achieved by empowering the predominantly farming population of Indonesia. In this regard, the government can utilize Absentee Land to achieve food resilience goals and improve the welfare of farmers. However, the utilization of Absentee Land is hindered by regulations restricting land ownership to civil servants. These regulations pose a significant obstacle to farmers who seek to engage in or expand agricultural endeavors. The conflicts arising from these regulations constitute the most substantial barrier to farmers' efforts to realize food resilience programs in Indonesia. This research uses a normative legal research method, focusing on the Absentee Land through statutory and case approaches. The results of this research indicate that regulations regarding Absentee Land has no longer relevant given the current state of affairs, as they impede the maximization of food resilience, particularly for farmers in the agricultural sector. Abstrak Ketahanan pangan merupakan hal yang sangat penting dalam program keberlangsungan bangsa. Populasi besar dan sangat beragam yang ada di Indonesia menjadikan ketahanan pangan ini harus menjadi prioritas utama dalam program pemerintah. Ketahanan pangan ini dapat diterapkan dengan cara memberdayakan masyarakat Indonesia yang kebanyakan berprofesi sebagai petani. Dalam hal ini pemerintah bisa memanfaatkan Tanah Absentee dalam mencapai tujuan ketahanan pangan dan dapat mensejahterakan petani. Namun dalam pemanfaatan tanah Absentee ini masih terhalang oleh peraturan yang menghambat kepemilikan tanah Absentee untuk para petani. Adanya peraturan tentang kepemilikan tanah Absentee yang hanya dapat dimiliki oleh Pegawai Negeri Sipil menjadi halangan bagi petani yang akan menjalankan atau mengembangkan usaha dalam pertanian. Konflik dalam peraturan kepemilikan tanah Absentee ini adalah hambatan terbesar dalam usaha petani mewujudkan program ketahanan pangan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini akan menggunakan peneltian hukum normatif, dimana dalam studi ini akan menggali penelitian dari tanah Absentee dengan menggunakan pendekatan Perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil dari penelitian ini bahwa peraturan yang mengatur tentang tanah Absentee ini sudah tidak relevan diterapkan dengan keadaan saat ini karena ketahanan pangan sektor pertanian khususnya bagi petani tidak dapat dimaksimalkan.]]>
<![CDATA[The Notary's Responsibility for the Validity of Legalization of a Deed Under Hand Signed Without the Presence of the Parties (Case Study of Decision No. 146/PDT/2018/PT YYK) ]]>
<![CDATA[Arkani, Fatmawaty]]>;
<![CDATA[Masykur, Mohammad Hamidi]]>;
<![CDATA[Harini, Novita Dian Phra]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 4 No 3 (2024): IJHESS DECEMBER 2024 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v4i3.1424
<![CDATA[This research aims to examine the responsibilities of notaries in the legalization of private documents signed without the presence of the related parties. The primary focus is the analysis of Decision No. 146/PDT/2018/PT YYK, which highlights issues concerning the validity of the legalization of a land sale and purchase deed involving forged signatures. This study underscores Indonesian civil law regulations and the Notary Law (UUJN), which mandate that all parties involved in private documents must be present before the notary during the legalization process. The research adopts a normative juridical method with a conceptual, statutory, case-based, and comparative approach. The findings reveal that the legalization process conducted without the presence of all parties violates legal procedures and may compromise the validity of the document. Furthermore, the accountability of notaries who fail to comply with these procedures is not explicitly regulated under the UUJN or the code of ethics, creating potential risks for misuse. This study recommends the establishment of stricter regulations regarding sanctions for negligent notaries to ensure compliance with the law and protect the legal interests of all parties involved.]]>
<![CDATA[Agricultural Absentee Land Ownership Rules: Problem or Solution for Farmers on Food Resilience Program? ]]>
<![CDATA[Perkasa, Surya Rimba]]>;
<![CDATA[Koeswahyono, Imam]]>;
<![CDATA[Masykur, Mohammad Hamidi]]>
<![CDATA[ BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): Bhumi: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31292/bhumi.v10i2.783
<![CDATA[Abstract: Food resilience is a critical aspect of national sustainability programs. with large and diverse population, Indonesia needs to prioritize food resilience as a primary focus of government programs. Empowering Indonesia's predominantly farming population is one way to achieve food resilience. In this regard, the government can utilize absentee land to achieve food resilience goals and improve the welfare of farmers. However, regulations restricting land ownership to civil servants under Article 3 of Government Regulation No. 224 of 1961 hinder the utilization of absentee land. These regulations pose a significant obstacle to farmers who seek to engage in or expand agricultural endeavors. The conflicts arising from these regulations constitute the most substantial barrier to farmers' efforts to realize food resilience programs in Indonesia. This research uses a normative legal research method, focusing on the absent land through statutory and case approaches. The results of this research suggest that absentee land regulations are no longer relevant given the current state of affairs, as they impede the maximization of food resilience, particularly for farmers in the agricultural sector. Keywords: Absentee Land, Farm Land, Food Resilience]]>
<![CDATA[Ratio Legis Phrase "Mandatory" in Government Regulation on Land Deed Making Officer As Protocol Recipient ]]>
<![CDATA[Arianti, Rizki Diaswari Laila]]>;
<![CDATA[Budiono, Abdul Rachmad]]>;
<![CDATA[Masykur, Mohammad Hamidi]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 7 No 2 (2025) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v7i2.471
<![CDATA[The phrase “obligatory” in the government regulation regarding the Land Deed Official as the recipient of the protocol has significant legal implications in determining the nature of his/her obligations. The ratio legis of this phrase is important to assess whether the obligation is absolute or conditional, which affects legal certainty and uniformity of its application. This study uses a normative legal method, namely analyzing legal norms through the interpretation of relevant laws, regulations, and legal doctrines. This study relies on primary legal materials, including laws and government regulations; secondary legal materials, such as legal commentaries and scientific articles; and tertiary legal materials, including legal dictionaries and encyclopedias. Data collection was carried out through a literature study, which ensured a comprehensive examination of legal texts and academic discussions. This study aims to evaluate the extent to which the term “obligatory” imposes binding duties on the Land Deed Official in receiving and managing the protocol. The research findings indicate that the phrase “obligatory” reflects an imperative legal obligation based on the theory of legal positivism, which prioritizes compliance with written legal norms. However, from the perspective of the theory of legal certainty (Rechtszekerheid), the regulation is less clear in defining the procedural mechanism, resulting in inconsistent application among Land Deed Officials. This ambiguity poses challenges in enforcing uniform practices, potentially undermining the effectiveness of the regulation.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Construction of Government Agency Asset Certification Regarding Land Rights Formerly Under Dutch Control ]]>
<![CDATA[Mahendra, Jacki]]>;
<![CDATA[Masykur, Mohammad Hamidi]]>;
<![CDATA[Sjafi'i, R. Imam Rahmat]]>
<![CDATA[ Danadyaksa: Post Modern Economy Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Post Modern Economy Journal ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Bustanul Ulum Mojokerto ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.69965/danadyaksa.v3i1.154
<![CDATA[An important aspect of optimal management of state assets includes aspects of securing state assets. The form of state asset security measures can be through certification activities for land plots spread throughout the territory of Indonesia. Normatively, "Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2004 concerning State Treasury instructs that state/regional property in the form of land controlled by the Central/Regional Government must be certified in the name of the government of the Republic of Indonesia/the relevant regional government." In its development, it turned out that there were assets owned by government agencies that had the status of objects of Control of Fixed Assets Owned by Individual Dutch Citizens" or Dutch Legal Entities (P3MB). Normatively, the P3MB land certification process has special regulatory characteristics, namely the priority scale of granting rights and payment of compensation to the State through the Sale and Purchase. Of course, this is. However, what the author needs to highlight here is that there is no subject of Prospective Recipients of Rights in the Government/Government Agency group. In addition, problems also occur regarding the purchase mechanism up to the process of transferring rights by Government Agencies, which should be a single entity with the State itself.]]>
<![CDATA[Ratio Decidendi of Judges Decisions on Grondkaart Land Disputes in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Masykur, Mohammad Hamidi]]>;
<![CDATA[Khoironi, Moh. Lu'ay]]>;
<![CDATA[Jimmy Firmansyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Apriyas Munik]]>
<![CDATA[ Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024): June, 2024 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.vol19i1.3847
<![CDATA[The impact of the existence of Grondkaart Land throughout Indonesia in its development has led to conflicts that can be classified into 4 (four): first, between the community and PT KAI; second, Indigenous people with PT KAI; third, City/Regency Government with PT KAI; and fourth, Sultanate/Palace with PT KAI. In general, community members who have controlled and utilised the Grondkaart land for many years feel they have the right to apply for property rights to the local Land Office. Meanwhile, PT KAI continues to maintain that these lands are legitimate PT KAI assets based on the history of the Indonesian Nation which gave birth to the Land Map or Grondkaart as evidence of land control instructions by PT KAI. in this research, a normative juridical research method is used by using several approaches, namely the Statute Approach (Legislation Approach), Conceptual Approach (Concept Approach), Case Approach (Case Approach), and Comparative Approach (Comparative Approach) by using descriptive analytical methods that aim to describe precisely. From this, it causes a lawsuit in court as the final estuary where to seek justice, but the Court Institution which is expected to be a place to find justice actually has a difference in views / Disparity between Judges in viewing Grondkaart Land evidence so as to cause legal uncertainty. From this legal uncertainty]]>
<![CDATA[Reformulation Of Land And/Or Building Acquisition Tax Refunds As A Form Of Justice For Taxpayers ]]>
<![CDATA[Rakhmawati, Santi Nur]]>;
<![CDATA[Dewi, Amelia Sri Kusuma]]>;
<![CDATA[Masykur, Mohammad Hamidi]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 7 No 3 (2025) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v7i3.627
<![CDATA[Abstrak Penelitian ini membahas konflik norma yang timbul antara peraturan daerah dan peraturan pemerintah yang lebih tinggi terkait dengan pengembalian Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah dan Bangunan (BPHTB) dalam kasus pembatalan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB). Fokus penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis dan merumuskan solusi normatif terhadap ketidaksesuaian antara Pasal 16 Ayat (9) Peraturan Bupati Malang Nomor 191 Tahun 2024 dan peraturan lainnya yang mengatur BPHTB. Metodologi yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konsep hukum. Data dikumpulkan melalui studi pustaka, dengan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, kemudian dianalisis secara preskriptif dan sistematis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa reformulasi terhadap pasal yang mengatur pengembalian BPHTB sangat diperlukan untuk menciptakan keadilan dan kepastian hukum bagi wajib pajak. Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada penataan ulang regulasi BPHTB, serta memberikan solusi terhadap konflik norma yang ada. Kata Kunci: Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah dan Bangunan, BPHTB, Konflik Norma, Peraturan Daerah, Pembatalan PPJB Abstract This study addresses the conflict of norms arising between regional regulations and higher government regulations concerning the refund of Land and Building Acquisition Duty (BPHTB) in the case of the cancellation of the Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement (PPJB). The focus of this research is to analyze and formulate a normative solution to the inconsistency between Article 16 Paragraph (9) of the Regent of Malang Regulation No. 191 of 2024 and other regulations governing BPHTB. The methodology used is a normative legal research with an approach of legislation and legal concepts. Data were collected through library research, using primary and secondary legal sources, and then analyzed prescriptively and systematically. The results of the study indicate that a reformulation of the article governing BPHTB refunds is necessary to create justice and legal certainty for taxpayers. This research contributes to the reorganization of BPHTB regulations and provides solutions to the existing norm conflicts. Keywords: Land and Building Acquisition Duty, BPHTB, Norm Conflict, Regional Regulations, Cancellation of PPJB]]>
<![CDATA[Conceptualisation of Grondkaart Regulation for Land Legal Certainty in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Masykur, Mohammad Hamidi]]>;
<![CDATA[Mulyono, Ferio Ivan]]>;
<![CDATA[Ganecha, Maulana Kasyfillah Syauqi]]>
<![CDATA[ Arena Hukum Vol. 18 No. 3 (2025) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Brawijaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum2025.01803.2
<![CDATA[Land conflicts in Indonesia remain persistent, particularly disputes over Grondkaart lands controlled by Perseroran Terbatas Kereta Api Indonesia (PT KAI). The absence of explicit regulation in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) and fragmented policy paradigms across institutions have led to legal uncertainty. Previous studies conducted by Karini (2021), Silvianna (2020), and Sulistiowati et al. (2020) examined Grondkaart as evidence of control or dispute resolution. However, they did not provide a comprehensive conceptualisation of permanent land rights for railway infrastructure. This research addresses that gap by analysing Grondkaart through the framework of Special Use Rights (Hak Pakai Khusus) as a sustainable legal solution. This normative juridical research uses statutory and conceptual approaches, focusing on the historical trajectory of Grondkaart from Dutch nationalisation and its problematic conversion into temporary Rights to Use. The findings show that granting PT KAI Special Use Rights with permanent validity provides stronger legal certainty than temporary rights, considering the permanent social function of railways. In practice, binding precedents and Supreme Court Circular Letters (SEMA) can guide judges in resolving disputes, though challenges persist in consistency and judicial understanding. This research recommends reforming agrarian law by affirming Special Use Rights for PT KAI as a permanent solution. Internationally, the article offers insights into post-colonial land disputes, showing how reconciling historical claims with present infrastructure needs can inspire reforms in other jurisdictions. The Indonesian case enriches global discourse on land rights and legal certainty, making it relevant to foreign scholars and policymakers.]]>
