Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.693
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Elemen Jurnal Gantang HISTOGRAM: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Numeracy : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education) Lentera Sriwijaya : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR) Jurnal Anugerah: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Bidang Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Basic Education Research Inovasi Matematika (Inomatika)
Cecil Hiltrimartin
Universitas Sriwijaya
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 26 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Cultural Responsive Teaching: Increasing Student PPKn Learning Outcomes Latipia Damayanti; Cecil Hiltrimartin; Destiana Wati
Journal of Basic Education Research Vol 4 No 3 (2023): September
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37251/jber.v4i3.723

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This research will explore how a culturally responsive teaching approach can improve students' cognitive learning outcomes. This classroom action research aims to enhance students' cognitive learning outcomes using a culturally responsive teaching approach. Methodology: This research was carried out in class III in Civics subjects. The type of research method used by researchers was Classroom Action Research. The population and sample used in this study were all class III students at Elementary School 07 Palembang. Data collection techniques used by researchers are observation, field notes, and tests. Data analysis techniques used are qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis. Main Findings: The results of this research are that the application of the culturally responsive teaching approach to Civics subjects in class III can improve student learning outcomes with results in cycle I as much as 57.6%, cycle II as much as 73%, and cycle III as much as 88.4% and post-test 92%. .3% with a student completion target of 85%. Novelty/Originality of this study: Researchers used a culturally responsive teaching approach to improve students' cognitive learning outcomes in grade III Elementary School Civics subjects.
Application of The Make A Match Model to Improve The Learning Outcomes of Class II Students in Elementary Schools Laili Mutia Qodra; Cecil Hiltrimartin; Destiana Wati
Journal of Basic Education Research Vol 4 No 3 (2023): September
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37251/jber.v4i3.724

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This research aims to improve the learning outcomes of class II students through the Make a Match learning model at State Elementary School 07 Palembang. This type of research is classroom action research carried out over two cycles. The subjects of this research were 30 students. Methodology: The techniques used for data collection are tests, observation, and documentation. The data analysis technique used is qualitative and quantitative data analysis. The research results show that learning outcomes using the Make a Match type cooperative learning model have increased in Indonesian language subjects. Main Findings: This can be seen from before the action. The average student score was only 61.83, with a completion percentage of only 60%. In cycle I, the average student score was 68, 47, with a completion percentage reaching 73%. In cycle II, the average student score was 76.30, and the completion rate reached 83%. Novelty/Originality of this study: The latest research applies the make-a-match learning model to Indonesian language subjects. Thus, using the make-a-match type cooperative learning model can improve the learning outcomes of class 2 students in Indonesian language subjects.
Efforts to Increase the Interest and Learning Outcomes Students in Learning Indonesian Through Slipboard Media Awliya Nur Oktadita; Cecil Hiltrimartin; Destiana Wati
Journal of Basic Education Research Vol 4 No 3 (2023): September
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37251/jber.v4i3.728

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This research aims to increase class IV students' interest and learning outcomes in learning Indonesian through slip board media. Methodology: The research method used was classroom action research, which was carried out at Elementary School 07 Palembang in class IV A. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. The data collection instruments used were observation instruments and evaluation tests. The data analysis used is qualitative descriptive techniques and quantitative percentages of student interests and learning outcomes. Main Findings: Based on the research results, it is known that there has been an increase in students' interest and learning outcomes in learning Indonesian. This means that by using slip board media, students are able to increase their learning activities. Novelty/Originality of this study: The newness of this research lies in the slip board media used by researchers, where learning Indonesian can increase students' interest and learning outcomes. The limitation of this research is that it only focuses on class IV A of elementary schools. Researchers recommend that other research develop slip board media for Indonesian language learning or use other media in order to increase the interest and learning outcomes of elementary school students.
Pembelajaran Operasi Perkalian melalui Permainan Tepuk Bergambar pada Siswa Tunagrahita Ringan di YPAC Palembang Dea Alvionita Azka; Cecil Hiltrimartin; Indaryanti
Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 5 No. 1 (2016): Januari
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education Program IPI Garut

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31980/mosharafa.v5i1.342

Abstract

Penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif yang bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan pembelajaran operasi bilangan melalui permainan tepuk bergambar pada siswa tunagrahita ringan di YPAC Palembang. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa kelas VIII YPAC Palembang yang berjumlah 4 orang. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah rekaman video dan observasi. Rekaman video dilakukan untuk mengamati kegiatan siswa selama proses pembelajaran dan membandingkannya dengan lembar observasi. Selama proses pembelajaran operasi bilangan melalui permainan tepuk bergambar, guru membantu siswa tunagrahita ringan menterjemahkan peristiwa penjumlahan berulang sebagai operasi perkalian. Sehingga, pada akhir pembelajaran, siswa bisa mengerjakan soal-soal yang diberikan. This qualitative descriptive research aims at describing the operation of number learning through picture clapping conducted to students with light mental retardation at Institute for physically and mentally handicapped children in Palembang. This study involves four students at the eighth grade as the subjects. Video recording and observation are undertaken to collect the data. The students' learning process will be recorded in video and later compared to the results of the observation. During the learning process using the selected strategy, teachers' role is as the facilitator to help the pupils translating the repeated adding question to be the multiplying operation. Thus, in the end of the class, students are able to do the exercises given.
The Structure Of Algebraic Argumentation Of High School Students With The Toulmin Model Debi Suci Putri; Yusuf Hartono; Cecil Hiltrimartin
Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR) Vol 4 No 2 (2023): November 2023
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Wisnuwardhana University of Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37303/jelmar.v4i2.123

Abstract

Mathematical argumentation is an important skill that must be owned in the 21st century. The purpose of the research is to analyze the structure of high school students' algebraic argumentation using the Toulmin model which consists of claim, data, warrant, and backing. This study involved 35 students in the odd semester of the 2022/2023 academic year at Muhammadiyah 1 Palembang High School. The students were asked to provide algebraic argumentation in mathematical proofs related to the quadratic function theorem. The algebraic argumentation was then analyzed using the Toulmin model. The results showed that 20% of students' mathematical argumentation skills were at level 5; 57.14% of students' mathematical argumentation skills were at level 4; 20% of students' mathematical argumentation skills were at level 3; 2.86% of students' mathematical argumentation skills were at level 2; and no students were at level 1.
Toulmin's Model in Analyzing Students' Combinatoric Argumentation Zahra Alhumairah Basa; Yusuf Hartono; Nyimas Aisyah; Cecil Hiltrimartin
Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 13 No. 4 (2024): October
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education Program IPI Garut

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31980/mosharafa.v13i4.76

Abstract

Abstrak Argumentasi kombinatorik merupakan kemampuan penting dalam pembuktian matematika yang menurut model Toulmin, argumentasi tersebut terdiri dari claim, evidence, warrant, dan backing. Tujuan dari penelitian yaitu untuk menganalisis struktur argumentasi kombinatorik mahasiswa menggunakan model Toulmin. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Pada penelitian ini melibatkan 93 mahasiswa semester dua tahun ajaran 2022/2023 di Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Sriwijaya. Pengumpulan data pada penelitian ini melalui tes tertulis. Para mahasiswa diminta untuk memberikan argumentasi kombinatorik pada pembuktian matematika yang berkaitan dengan teorema binomial. Argumentasi kombinatorik tersebut kemudian dianalisis menggunakan model Toulmin. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 96% kemampuan argumentasi kombinatorik mahasiswa berada pada level 2 dengan kategori argumentasi kombinatorik disusun dengan kurang baik, serta sebagian besar mahasiswa mengalami kesulitan dalam memberikan claim, evidence, warrant, dan backing dalam argumentasi kombinatorik. Berdasarkan temuan ini, disarankan agar program pembelajaran difokuskan pada penguatan keterampilan berpikir kritis dan argumentatif, melalui metode diskusi terbimbing, problem-based learning, serta pemberian latihan soal yang mendorong eksplorasi dan pembenaran logis atas setiap jawaban yang diberikan mahasiswa Abstract Combinatorial argumentation is an important ability in mathematical proof, and according to Toulmin's model, the argumentation consists of claim, evidence, warrant, and backing. The purpose of the research is to analyze the combinatorial argumentation structure of undergraduate students using the Toulmin model. The type of research used in this research is descriptive qualitative. This study involved 93 second-semester undergraduate students in the 2022/2023 academic year at the Department of Mathematics Education, Sriwijaya University. Data collection in this study was through written tests. The undergraduate students were instructed to provide combinatorial argumentation on mathematical proofs related to the binomial theorem. The combinatorial argumentation was then analyzed using the Toulmin model. The results showed that 96% of undergraduate students' combinatorial argumentation skills were at level 2 with the category of badly organized combinatorial argumentation, and most undergraduate students had difficulties in providing claim, evidence, warrant, and backing in combinatorial argumentation. Based on these results, it is suggested that the learning program should focus on the improvement of critical and argumentative thinking skills through guided discussions, problem-based learning, and exercises that encourage exploration and logical justification of each answer given by undergraduate students.
Co-Authors Annisa Oktavia Lestari Ardina Mayasari Awliya Nur Oktadita Azka 'Afifah Azka 'Afifah Dea Alvionita Azka Debi Suci Putri Destiana Wati Destiana Wati Elfrida Ratnawati Ely Susanti Ely Susanty Hardian Mei Fajri Indaryanti Indaryanti Jeri Araiku Kurniadi, Elika Laili Mutia Qodra Latipia Damayanti M Yusup Melia Kartika Meryansumayeka Meryansumayeka Nety Wahyu Saputri Norma Setiawati Nyimas Aisyah Pratiwi, Weni Dwi Ratu Ilma Indra Putri Reppy Erpina Santoso, Budi Scristia, Scristia Sherly Oktaviani Somakim, Somakim Theresia Ingga Sari Widya Nessa Yanti Pratiwi Yulianita Maharani Yusuf Hartono Zahra Alhumairah Basa Zulkardi Zulkardi Zulkardi Zulkardi