Khabib Sholeh
Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo

Published : 42 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

ADAPTASI PROGRAM MICROTEACHING BAGI CALON GURU BAHASA INDONESIA PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 Main Sufanti; Dini Restiyanti Pratiwi; Khabib Sholeh
Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora Vol 23, No 1: Februari 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/humaniora.v23i1.19161

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the implementation of a microteaching program to pre-service Bahasa Indonesia teachers during the Covid-19 pandemic, the advantages of the program, and its weaknesses. Data related to the changes in the program when facing a pandemic, advantages of program changes, and weaknesses. Data obtained from the Microteaching course in the Indonesian Language and Literature Department in The Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Microteaching in the semester of 2019/2020 amounted to 209 students. Data were from observation techniques, questionnaires, and document analysis. The sample was selected randomly. Triangulation techniques and methods validated the data, the interactive term used for data analysis. The results of this study are as follows. (1) To deal with the Covid-19, there are no changes in the core stages of Microteaching, but it needs some adaptations to the implementation, such as learning tools, teaching practices, observation activities, and assessments. (2) The advantages of adapting this program are students have flexible time and place of practice, improved information technology capabilities, and the student experience varies as they can write more stories. (3) The weaknesses of the adaptation of this program are the workload of lecturers increases, student learning burden increases, limited interaction, and network problems
MODEL PARTICIPATORY MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES (PARMI) UNTUK PEMBELAJARAN MENULIS KARYA ILMIAH Khabib Sholeh
Dialektika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Vol 1, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : Department of Indonesia Language and Literature Teaching, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/dialektika.v1i2.6291

Abstract

Writing skills into a final charge of the most important master learners. Writing skills should be practiced and focused on higher education is to write scientific papers. In the meantime, until now there is no learning model appropriate to write scientific papers in order to improve the literacy skills of learners as may be necessary, especially in supporting their studies. Model of learning to write scientific papers should encourage learners to high literacy skills are supported by critical and creative thinking skills, and the ability to solve problems. The purpose of this study is (1) a description keterterapan level model of multiple intelligences oriented substantasi participation of students in the content and structure of the model design flexibility; and (2) description of the effectiveness model of multiple intelligences oriented learners participation resulting in an increase in learners' achievements in writing scientific papers. The criteria used as a basis to determine the validity of the instrument is to consider the value of lambda (λ) the provisions, if the lambda (λ)> 0.3 means the item number to be valid. The test is done in addition to the learning model is also equipped with a qualitative test quantitatively using equetion structural modeling (SEM) with Lisrel program. Effectiveness of the test design used was quasi experimental method (Quasi-Experimental design), the model Nonequivalent Control Group, carried out three times with t-test test. Analysis of the suitability test hypothetical models parmi model evaluation with field data based on the implementation of the test data, the results obtained following a) all seem to have the value of the variable load factor (λ)> 0.3; b) Chi-Square = 0.61, df = 1, ρ-value = 0.43 (> 0.05); c) RMSEA of 0.00 (<0.08); and d) GFI = 0.99 (> 0.90). The results of this analysis indicate the suitability parmi models with field data. In other words, the model is consistent with the data, so it can be used as a model of learning to write scientific papers in college. The average value of the critical-creative thinking skills in experiment 3 for the control group was 68.31, while the experimental group was 74.88. That is, treatment with parmi models affect the learning process. The results of the t test = 15,066> t table = 1.98. The difference in the average value was significant and proven to be effective in improving the ability of writing articles.