Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

A Comparative Analysis of Minority Political Participation from an Islamic Perspective in Indonesia and Singapore Syarif, Mujar Ibnu; Kharlie, Ahmad Tholabi; Purkon, Arip
AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 9 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/jhi.v9i2.11124

Abstract

This study aims to examine the Islamic political concept of minority political participation and compare its implementation in the contexts of Indonesia and Singapore. The research is a qualitative study utilizing a comparative method, combined with descriptive and analytical approaches. The data sources are twofold: primary sources, such as the Constitutions of the Republic of Indonesia and Singapore, and secondary sources, including several academic works relevant to the research topic, sourced from both print and online media. Data analysis was carried out in four stages: data collection, reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings of this study indicate that political participation refers to the actions of citizens to influence government policies, enabling the government to be guided towards issuing egalitarian policies. Minorities in Indonesia include Protestants, Catholics, Buddhists, Hindus, and Confucians, while minorities in Singapore comprise Muslims, Christians, Hindus, Confucians, Taoists, and atheists. Indonesia is a moderate country that blends Islamism and secularism, whereas Singapore is a secular state. The conclusion of this study reveals that most Islamic scholars argue that non-Muslim minorities cannot fully participate in politics unless in emergency situations. On the other hand, liberal Muslim intellectuals believe that non-Muslims can fully participate in politics, even outside of emergency contexts. The majority of Muslim intellectuals in both Indonesia and Singapore allow full political participation for minorities, including becoming president, as there are no restrictions in either country preventing minorities from holding the presidency. The comparative analysis shows that minorities in both Indonesia and Singapore have equal standing with the majority. However, in Indonesia, no minority has yet succeeded in becoming President, whereas in Singapore, Halimah Yacob, a Muslim minority, became the country’s first female president.
Problematika Perizinan Penyadapan Oleh KPK Pasca Revisi Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 Rachman, Andi Nur; Syarif, Mujar Ibnu
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 6, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i1.22068

Abstract

The revision process of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Law resulted in structural changes with the formation of the KPK Supervisory Board. This change impacts the work procedures of KPK investigators, especially in conducting wiretapping of corruption suspects. This article analyzes the problematic issues of wiretapping permits by the KPK after the revision of Law Number 19 of 2019, which introduced a multi-layered bureaucracy. This study uses a normative legal method with statutory regulations. The results of the study indicate that the revision of the law requires the KPK to obtain permission from the Supervisory Board before conducting wiretapping, which has the potential to hinder the effectiveness and speed of investigations. However, after a judicial review was conducted at the Constitutional Court, it was decided that wiretapping could be carried out without permission from the Supervisory Board but must still be notified within a specific period. This decision is measured as a positive step in maintaining a balance between the effectiveness of corruption eradication and the accountability of the KPK institution.
Problematika Perizinan Penyadapan Oleh KPK Pasca Revisi Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 Rachman, Andi Nur; Syarif, Mujar Ibnu
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i1.22068

Abstract

The revision process of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Law resulted in structural changes with the formation of the KPK Supervisory Board. This change impacts the work procedures of KPK investigators, especially in conducting wiretapping of corruption suspects. This article analyzes the problematic issues of wiretapping permits by the KPK after the revision of Law Number 19 of 2019, which introduced a multi-layered bureaucracy. This study uses a normative legal method with statutory regulations. The results of the study indicate that the revision of the law requires the KPK to obtain permission from the Supervisory Board before conducting wiretapping, which has the potential to hinder the effectiveness and speed of investigations. However, after a judicial review was conducted at the Constitutional Court, it was decided that wiretapping could be carried out without permission from the Supervisory Board but must still be notified within a specific period. This decision is measured as a positive step in maintaining a balance between the effectiveness of corruption eradication and the accountability of the KPK institution.
Problematika Izin Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Terhadap Upaya Penyadapan Tersangka Korupsi Rachman , Andi Nur; Syarif, Mujar Ibnu
Mavisha: Law and Society Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Legal Community Associations

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/10mvcr48

Abstract

The process of revising the KPK law gave rise to a new structure within the corruption erradiction commision. With the existence of the KPK Supervisory Board, the KPK's performance must be adapted to the results of the revision of the law. This article aims to explain cases of licensing issues experienced by KPK employees or investigators in an effort to wiretap corruption suspects to the KPK Supervisory Board. This arose due to the revision of the latest KPK law, namely Law number. 19 of 2019 so that there are many bureaucracies that hinder the performance of investigators in carry out efforts to eradicate corruption. The performance of investigators who are required to be fast and immediately confronted with layers of bureaucracy related to wiretapping. The research method used is a normative juridical approach  using the statutory approach. The results of the research obtained are that the latest revision of the KPK law makes the wiretapping mechanism for corruption suspects must take permits and layers of bureaucracy. After a judicial review related to Law Number 19 of 2019, the Constitutional Court granted a material claim related to the article governing wiretapping. Now the KPK only notifies the Supervisory Board no later than 14 (fourteen) work days after the wiretapping is carried out. This is a good thing because the investigator's actions are impermeable and immediately can run well.
KONSEP RIBA DALAM ALQURAN DAN LITERATUR FIKIH Syarif, Mujar Ibnu
Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 3 No. 2 (2011)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/aiq.v3i2.2527

Abstract

The majority of commentators (jumhûr al-mufassirîn) argued that the reference of riba is a gift (al-‘athiyyah) of one person to another, not with the aim of reaching Allah's pleasure. However, riba was just to get a mere worldly rewards. The Qur'an did not explicitly mention the prohibition of riba. Therefore, the scholars differ on what is really meant by riba in Qur'an verses. Some scholars say the meaning of riba in the Quran is forbidden riba or riba nasî'ah. In this article, the concept of riba is studied based onthe Jurisprudence literatureDOI: