Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum International Journal of Social Science Media Bina Ilmiah MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Abdul Hayy Nasution
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
PENERAPAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PERSPEKTIF ADMINISTRATIVE PENAL LAW (Studi Kasus PT. Indosat dan PT. Indosat Mega Media (IM2) Abdul Hayy Nasution
Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 7, No 1 (2017): SURYA KENCANA SATU
Publisher : Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (558.893 KB) | DOI: 10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v7i1.589

Abstract

ABSTRACTPenelitian ini menjelaskan asas Logische Specialiteit dan Lex Specialis Systematis Derogat Lex Generali dalam penerapan hukum, akan tetapi pada faktanya dalam kasus PT. Indosat dan PT. Indosat Mega Media (IM2) mestinya diterapkan Undang-Undang Telekomunikasi nomor 36 Tahun 1999 yang berdimensi administrasi hukum pidana bukan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Dalam penelitian ini, metode yang ini digunakan dalan adala likuid penelitian Studi kasus dengan mengkaji, menelaah, memperbandingkan dan atau analisis agar dapat diperoleh gambaran yang jelas tentang proses memperoleh keadilan bagi setiap orang ataupun Korporasi yang didakwa dengan pasal 2 juncto pasal 20 Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa penerapan hukum dalam kasus ini tidak sesuai dengan asas lex Specialis derogat lex Generali dan terkesan dalam penerapan hukum dipaksakan untuk tindak pidana korupsi oleh Kejari. Kata Kunci : Undang-Undang Tindakan Pidana Korupsi, Undang-Undang Telekomunikasi,  Azas Lex Specialis Derogat Lex Generali.
Zona Integritas dan Pengendalian Gratifikasi dalam Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah pada Kantor Pertanahan di Indonesia Siti Chadijah; Dwi Kusumo Wardhani; Abdul Hayy Nasution
Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Rechtsregel: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (196.431 KB) | DOI: 10.32493/rjih.v4i1.12663

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze the problems of public services in the land office and to analyze the efforts made to control gratification in the Land Office. The research method used is Socio Legal, the effect of legal rules on certain social problems, in this case analyzing the legal rules of public services and the eradication of corruption associated with the implementation of public services at land offices in Indonesia with a case-based approach.The results in this study, on the one hand, found a form of problematic public services at the land office, namely the massive gratification carried out by officials / ASN. However, on the other hand, efforts have been made to control gratuities, including the Head of BPN regulation Number 15 of 2013 concerning Gratuity Control, which still has weaknesses in its application, so that further efforts are needed to create an Integrity Zone in land offices in Indonesia.
AUTHORITY OF MILITARY POLICE INVESTIGATORS REGARDING CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION ACCORDING TO LAW NUMBER 31 OF 1997 CONCERNING MILITARY JUSTICE Abdul Hayy Nasution
International Journal of Social Science Vol. 4 No. 2: August 2024
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/ijss.v4i2.8436

Abstract

The background to this research is the investigation carried out by investigators within the scope of Military Justice with its implementation, and the role of the Military Police (POM) which coordinates with the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) as the front guard in eradicating Corruption Crimes. The problem in this research is the authority of Military Police Investigators (POM) regarding Corruption Crimes according to the Military Justice Law, as well as how the Military Police Investigators' (POM) Authority is implemented for Corruption Crimes according to the Military Justice Law. This research uses sociological jurisprudence. The sociological juridical approach is a research method carried out to obtain primary data and find the truth using inductive thinking methods and corresponding truth criteria and the facts used to carry out the induction process and correspondent truth testing are up-to-date facts. The way this sociological juridical method works in this research is from the results of collecting and discovering data and information through literature study of the basic assumptions and presumptions used in answering the problems in this research. The purpose of this research is to find out the authority of Military Police Investigators regarding Corruption Crimes according to the Military Justice Law, as well as how the authority of Military Police Investigators is implemented regarding Corruption Crimes according to the Military Justice Law
AUTHORITY OF CIVIL SERVANT INVESTIGATORS (PPNS) ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 424 PARAGRAPH (1) LAW NUMBER 17 OF 2023 CONCERNING HEALTH AGAINST ADDICTIVE SUBSTANCE ABUSE LINKED TO ARTICLE 82 OF LAW NUMBER 35 OF 2009 CONCERNING NARCOTICS Abdul Hayy Nasution
International Journal of Social Science Vol. 4 No. 4: December 2024
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/ijss.v4i4.9622

Abstract

Looking at current developments, this has an impact on narcotics abuse in all levels of society in Indonesia. The targets of narcotics distribution are not limited to people who experience broken homes, are frustrated, or people who live the nightlife, but have spread to other circles, especially students and students, and not a few even among executives. To be able to prevent and overcome these crimes, the role of Narcotics Investigators in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia is required. This research uses a type of normative legal research with a qualitative approach. Legal Regulation of the Authority of Investigators in Handling Narcotics Crimes in the Territory of the Republic of Indonesia is regulated in Article 7 to Article 9 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), Article 13 to Article 14 of Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Position of the Republic Indonesia, Article 424 of Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health, and Articles 73 to 88 of Law Number 35 of 2023 concerning Health 2009 Concerning Narcotics. The planned output for this research will be published in the form of an accredited journal
PENERAPAN HUKUM TERHADAP KEGIATAN ADMINISTRASI NEGARA YANG TIDAK SESUAI DENGAN ASAS-ASAS UMUM PEMERINTAHAN YANG BAIK Abdul Hayy Nasution; Nyak Amini
Media Bina Ilmiah Vol. 20 No. 1: Agustus 2025
Publisher : LPSDI Bina Patria

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, yang dimana bertujuan untuk memberikan perlindungan hukum dengan mendasarkan segala tindakan pemerintahan (bestuurs handelingen) harus memiliki dasar hukum yang jelas (keabsahan/legalitas) dan disediakan upaya hukum bagi warga masyarakat yang menderita kerugian akibat tindakan pemerintahan. Khusus mengenai sengketa administrasi yang timbul dari tindakan faktual pemerintah (feitelijke handelingen), UU AP mentransformasikan pengaturannya kedalam Pasal 85 Tentang peralihan penyelesaian sengketa “onrechmatige overheidsdaad” dari Pengadilan Umum ke PTUN, Pasal 22 dan Pasal 29 Tentang keputusan/tindakan diskresi serta Pasal 87 hurup a. PTUN berwenang untuk mengadili sengketa administrasi yang timbul dari tindakan faktual pemerintah (feitelijke handelingen), yang dimana terbatas pada pengujian keabsahan (legalitas), dan tidak sampai pada tuntutan terhadap ganti kerugian. Dalam hal ini PTUN mempunyai kewenangan untuk mengadili sengketa sengketa administrasi, yang timbul dari tindakan nyata pemerintah yang tidak sesuai dengan AUPB dalam mengeluarkan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara.
The Digital Transformation of Tafsir and Its Implications for Islamic Legal Derivation in the Contemporary Era Ali Sati; Abdul Halim; Abdul Hayy Nasution; Muhammad Ridwan
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10425

Abstract

The digitalization of Qur’anic interpretation has profoundly influenced the methodology of istinbat al-ahkam (deriving Islamic legal rulings), reshaping how scholars and legal institutions engage with classical texts in emerging digital platforms. This article explores the impact of selected tools—such as AI-driven tafsir platforms, semantic databases, and multimedia applications—on formulating Islamic legal reasoning in the digital era. Moving beyond a purely epistemological analysis, the study critically assesses how digital interfaces affect interpretive authority and methodological integrity and the production of contemporary legal responses to real-world issues, including Islamic digital finance, artificial intelligence ethics, and Sharia-based policymaking in digital environments. Utilizing a qualitative literature review combined with thematic content analysis, this research draws on classical sources and contemporary scholarship to investigate the shifting landscape of Islamic legal derivation in the digital age. Particular attention is given to the role of legal actors—such as fatwa councils, religious courts, and legislative bodies—in legitimizing or contesting digital tafsir outputs. The study applies maqasid al-shari’ah as developed by al-Shatibi as a normative framework to evaluate the legal-ethical implications of digital tafsir and its alignment with the objectives of protecting religion (din), intellect (‘aql), and public welfare (maslahah ‘ammah). Findings indicate that while digital tools significantly enhance accessibility, interactivity, and public engagement with Islamic texts, they also present challenges related to standardization, authenticity, and the erosion of traditional scholarly authority. This article offers a typology of digital influence—from functional assistance to epistemological disruption—and proposes practical pathways for integrating digital innovation within a framework of maqasid-oriented legal governance. The study contributes to the theoretical development of Islamic legal thought and the practical design of responsive, accountable, and ethically grounded legal frameworks for the digital era.
PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP PEMINJAMAN AKUN PINJAM ONLINE (PINJOL) YANG GAGAL BAYAR Abdul Hayy Nasution; Oksidelfa Yanto
Media Bina Ilmiah Vol. 19 No. 02: September 2024
Publisher : LPSDI Bina Patria

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Dunia digital mengalami perkembangan yang sangat pesat dan memberikan banyak pengaruh di berbagai sektor, salah satunya kehadiran layanan pinjam meminjam uang berbasis teknologi informasi yaitu Peer to Peer Lending. Namun tidak tertutup kemungkinan bahwa pelaksanaan Peer to Peer Lending beresiko pada suatu permasalahan hukum yakni gagal bayar dari Penerima Pinjaman yang akan merugikan Pemberi Pinjaman yang mendanai pengajuan pinjaman pada platform Penyelenggara. Berkaitan dengan hal tersebut, maka penelitian ini selanjutnya bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis tentang perlindungan hukum bagi pihak pemberi pinjaman terkait dengan resiko gagal bayar dalam layanan pinjaman berbasis peer to peer lending. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk menjelaskan penyelesaian sengketa akibat gagal bayar dalam peer to peer lending. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yakni metode penelitian hukum normatif. Perlindungan hukum terhadap pemberi pinjaman dan Penerima Pinjaman dengan dibentuknya peraturan khusus yang memberikan perlindungan bagi pengguna jasa Peer to Peer Lending yaitu Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 77/POJK.01/2016 khususnya Pasal 37 dan sanksi seperti denda, penjara, maupun hukuman tambahan lain yang diberikan setelah terjadi sengketa. Penyelesaian sengketa akibat gagal bayar dalam P2PL dapat dilakukan diluar maupun didalam pengadilan sesuai ketentuan Pasal 39 ayat (1) POJK Nomor 1/POJK.07/2013.
Co-Authors Abdul Halim Ali Sati Dwi Kusumo Wardhani Muhammad Ridwan Nyak Amini Oksidelfa Yanto Siti Chadijah