Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

IMPLEMENTATION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST HATE SPEECH THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA IN ELECTION CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES IN THE JURISDICTION OF THE CENTRAL KALIMANTAN REGIONAL POLICE Nur Aida Fitriana; Yacob F. Martono; Karlinae D. Bangas; Rizki Setyabowo Sangalang
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Social media has become a primary tool for election campaigns in Indonesia, but it has also fueled the rise of hate speech practices that have the potential to disrupt democracy and social stability. This study aims to analyze the implementation of law enforcement against hate speech through social media in election campaign activities within the jurisdiction of the Central Kalimantan Regional Police and to identify the obstacles faced by law enforcement officers. The research method used is empirical juridical with a descriptive approach through literature studies and interviews with the Central Kalimantan Regional Police. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of law enforcement against hate speech through social media in election campaign activities within the jurisdiction of the Central Kalimantan Regional Police is carried out through three main approaches: preventive, pre-emptive, and repressive. Preventive efforts are carried out through legal socialization, digital literacy education, and cyber patrols. Pre-emptive efforts are carried out through early detection of potential violations and coordination with Bawaslu, KPU, and Kominfo. Meanwhile, repressive efforts are carried out through investigations, inquiries, and prosecutions based on the law. However, this implementation is less effective and still faces several obstacles. Preventive efforts face challenges such as weak outreach and early monitoring, preemptive efforts face challenges such as a lack of early detection and a structured persuasive approach, and repressive efforts face challenges such as technical digital evidence and inconsistent law enforcement. These challenges indicate that the Central Kalimantan Regional Police (Polda Kalteng) still faces several shortcomings in handling hate speech cases on social media during election campaigns. These challenges stem from unclear and overlapping regulations between election criminal provisions, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, and technical regulations governing election organizers, leading to differing interpretations among law enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen inter-agency coordination and increase the capacity of law enforcement officers to handle hate speech cases during election campaigns so that they can be implemented effectively and fairly.
Ensuring Access to Justice for Children with Disabilities as Victims of Sexual Violence: A Socio-Legal Study at the Palangka Raya City Police Theresia Wineini; Kiki Kristanto; Karlinae D. Bangas
JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM Vol 10 No 1 (2026): Justitia jurnal Hukum (Article in Press)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/justitia.v10i1.28687

Abstract

This study examines the fulfillment of the rights of children with disabilities who are victims of sexual violence in the law enforcement process by the police. The purpose of this study is to analyze the forms of legal protection provided and to identify the obstacles faced by the police in handling these cases. This study uses empirical legal research methods with a qualitative approach. The results show that the Palangka Raya City Police have made efforts to provide legal protection through criminal and non-criminal measures. Criminal measures include the handling of cases by special investigators for children, the provision of assistance to victims, and the prosecution of perpetrators. Meanwhile, non-criminal measures are carried out through socialization activities, counseling on the prevention of sexual violence, and cooperation with child protection agencies and relevant social institutions. However, this study found various obstacles in fulfilling the rights of victims, including limited communication with victims due to disability and trauma, difficulties in obtaining witnesses and evidence, a lack of human resources with special expertise, weak coordination between institutions, social stigma against persons with disabilities, and the risk of intimidation and revictimization of victims. These findings emphasize the need to strengthen the institutional capacity of the police, improve cross-sector coordination, and adopt a human rights-based approach to ensure effective legal protection for children with disabilities who are victims of sexual violence.
POTENTIAL LEGITIMACY CRISIS AND DEADLOCK OF LAW NUMBER 23 OF 2014 WITH CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NUMBER 135/PUU-XXII/2024 ON THE TERM OF OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL PEOPLE'S REPRESENTATIVE COUNCIL Pratama, Dhimas Ari Yudha; D. Bangas, Karlinae; Nugraha, Satriya
International Journal of Cultural and Social Science Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): International Journal of Cultural and Social Science
Publisher : Pena Cendekia Insani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53806/ijcss.v7i2.1340

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the constitutional implications of Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 on the term of office of the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD), democratic legitimacy, and the potential for constitutional deadlock in the Indonesian state system. The main focus of the study lies in the conflicting norms between the principle of a five-year period of power as stipulated in Article 22E of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the consequences of the separation of National Elections and Regional Elections which have the potential to extend the term of office of the DPRD without renewing the electoral mandate. This study uses a normative legal research method (normative juridical) with a conceptual approach, a statutory approach, and a case approach. Data were obtained through a literature study of primary legal materials in the form of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government, and Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024, and secondary legal materials from related literature and scientific journals. The analysis was conducted qualitatively with systematic, grammatical, and teleological interpretation techniques. The research findings indicate that the separation of elections without a clear transitional design creates normative tension between the obligation to implement the Constitutional Court's final and binding rulings and the principles of periodicity of power and legal certainty. This situation has the potential to trigger a crisis of democratic legitimacy within the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) and create a constitutional deadlock in regional governance. The implications of this research emphasize the importance of formulating a comprehensive constitutional transition framework and legislative reconstruction to maintain the consistency of constitutional supremacy, the circulation of power, and the quality of local democracy in Indonesia.