Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

Rekonstruksi Peran Kepolisian dalam Pemenuhan Akses Keadilan bagi Tersangka pada Tahap Pra-Ajudikasi Berdasarkan KUHAP Baru Dede Adi Supriyadi; Haidan Angga Kusumah
Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Juli : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/hukum.v3i4.1184

Abstract

Indonesia’s Law No. 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code replaces the 1981 framework and emphasizes suspects’ rights as a central element of legal reform. However, broad police coercive authority during the pre-adjudication stage still creates risks of procedural-rights violations due to limited operational standards, safeguards, and accountability mechanisms. This study aims to analyze and reconstruct the police role to ensure suspects’ access to justice is aligned with the principle of due process of law. This normative legal research applies statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed using qualitative-normative methods involving systematization, interpretation, evaluation, and prescriptive legal construction. The findings show that the New Criminal Procedure Code strengthens suspects’ protection through mandatory interrogation recording, legal aid notification, advocate assistance, minimum evidentiary requirements, restrictions on coercive measures, and expanded pretrial review. Nevertheless, several implementation challenges remain, including the lack of technical recording standards, weak early legal-aid referral mechanisms, and unclear factual parameters for suspect designation, arrest, and detention. This study proposes an integrated pre-adjudication reconstruction based on due process of law, requiring implementing regulations, structured police discretion, and preventive and corrective oversight mechanisms to ensure meaningful protection of suspects’ rights.
Defisit Operasionalisasi Proporsionalitas dalam Pengamanan VVIP oleh Kepolisian Daerah Pasca UU kepolisian 2026 Wisnu Pamungkas; Haidan Angga Kusumah
Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Juli : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/hukum.v3i4.1188

Abstract

VVIP security brings together the state's obligation to protect top officials with restrictions on citizens' rights through road closures, inspections, expulsions, and the use of force. Amendments to the Police Law in 2026 demand a critical re-examination of operational legality and proportionality. This article analyzes the adequacy of the legal basis for VVIP security by the regional police and formulates measurable, proportional, accountable, and human rights-oriented operational standards. The research uses a normative legal design enriched by sociolegal evidence through purposive interviews with the leadership of Dit Samapta, the Head of the VIP Sub-Directorate, the head of the unit, and implementing personnel. The analysis was carried out by vertical synchronization, systematic interpretation, three-stage proportionality test, and triangulation between sources and between levels of positions. The results of the study show that the institutional authority of the National Police is available, but the authority of action has not been translated into special procedures regarding road closures, preventive checks, crowd handling, force escalation, and reporting. Six gaps were identified: authority basis, road procedures, power stages, threat assessment, respect for rights, and accountability. The changes to the law strengthen the principles of proportionality, transparency, and supervision, but have not yet provided a matrix of operational decisions. This article offers a documented proportionality model that links legal mandates, threat levels, least mitigated alternatives, impact balance, and audit footprint as a series of VVIP security decisions of Indonesian regional police.