Pujiyono Pujiyono
Universitas Diponegoro

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Politics and Green Financial Crime: Envisioning a Sustainable Democratic Future in Indonesia Yagie Sagita Putra; Pujiyono Pujiyono; Nur Rochaeti; Zico Junius Fernando
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 24 No 3 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2024.24.3.15576

Abstract

The Indonesian Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK) in Indonesia has uncovered a significant issue concerning illegal financial transactions linked to environmental crimes. They have identified that approximately 1 trillion Rupiah, obtained from such green financial crimes, is being funnelled into political parties for the 2024 elections. This discovery is particularly alarming, as it raises serious concerns about the integrity of the democratic process and the sustainability of the nation's political future. The PPATK's findings indicate that this illegal funding comes from various environmental crimes, including illegal logging and other environmentally damaging activities. The fact that these funds are being used to finance political campaigns implies a deeply concerning intersection between environmental crime and political corruption. This situation exemplifies a broader category of 'green financial crime', where environmental exploitation is directly linked to illicit financial gains. Results This research investigates the implications of these financial irregularities for the country's commitment to environmental conservation and the development of green policies. It discusses the broader implications for Indonesia's democratic order and urges a re-evaluation of current political funding mechanisms, advocating for transparent and accountable practices to ensure electoral integrity and promote a sustainable democratic future. The importance of collective action, involving civil society, policymakers, and international partners, to address the linkages between politics, democracy, and green financial crime ultimately protects Indonesia's democratic values and environmental heritage.
Reconstructing Reliability Standards for Deepfake Detectors as Electronic Evidence in Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System Muhammad Abdul Azis; Pujiyono Pujiyono; Riski Ananda Kusuma Putri
West Science Law and Human Rights Vol. 4 No. 03 (2026): West Science Law and Human Rights
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wslhr.v4i03.3022

Abstract

The development of deepfakes has transformed the evidentiary problem of video and audio from file authentication into an assessment of the computational method used to determine media authenticity. This study has two objectives: to examine the legal position and limits of the probative value of deepfake detector outputs under Indonesian criminal procedure and to reconstruct an AI Forensic Reliability Test that safeguards authenticity, scientific reliability, and procedural fairness. It applies normative legal research through statutory, conceptual, comparative, and interdisciplinary approaches. The first finding indicates that detector outputs may enter proceedings through electronic evidence, examination reports, and expert testimony, but they do not constitute independent evidence or binary statements of truth. Their value depends on object authenticity, lawful acquisition, methodological validity, error rates, and corroboration. The second finding develops an AI Forensic Reliability Test comprising eight dimensions: object authenticity, model validity, data quality, error rates and calibration, robustness and generalization, traceability and reproducibility, expert competence and independent testing, and procedural fairness and accountability. The framework operationalizes the negative statutory theory of proof, epistemic reliability, machine testimony, due process of law, equality of arms, and accountable algorithms