Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Kewenangan Otonomi Daerah: Sistem Pertanahan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Umar, Jaenudin
Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/cerdika.v1i2.27

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji lebih dalam mengenai polemik pertanahan di D.I Yogyakarta. Selain itu, kewenangan kebijakan pertanahan yang diterapkan di D.I Yogyakarta apakah sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 yaitu otonomi daerah bertujuan untuk memberikan kesejahteraan bagi masyarakat. Uraian poin penting dalam penulisan ini yaitu sejarah pertanahan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, pelaksanaan sistem pertanahan di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, serta pengelolaan dan pemanfaatan tanah Kasultanan dan Kadipaten. Ketiga hal tersebut diolah menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan sebagai bahan hukum primer. Analisis dilakukan secara kualitatif dengan sistem penulisan bersifat deskriptif analisis. Hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa adanya dualisme hukum pertanahan D.I Yogyakarta yaitu hukum nasional (UUPA) dan hukum adat (Rijkshblaad). Penengah atas polemik tersebut, maka muncul Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2012 tentang otonomi khusus bagi D.I Yogyakarta berfungsi untuk mengatur urusan rumah tangganya sendiri, termasuk sistem pertanahan. Sistem pertanahan yang ada di D.I Yogyakarta berbeda dengan daerah lain guna menjaga asal usul sejarah pertanahan D.I Yogyakarta. Otonomi daerah mempunyai tujuan untuk mensejahterakan masyarakat. Pengelolaan dan pemanfaatan tanah Kasultanan dan Kadipaten untuk kepentingan kebudayaan, kepentingan sosial serta kepentingan publik dengan didapatkannya perizinan baik dari Kasultanan maupun Kadipaten.
TAX LAW AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR PEOPLE'S WELFARE Jaenudin Umar
Journal of Social Research Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v3i3.1967

Abstract

Taxes are a crucial instrument in determining a country's revenue. However, challenges remain, especially in the face of societal resistance to tax collection. To achieve people's welfare, tax regulations are needed, namely tax laws, which require public awareness. Therefore, this paper will discuss the effect of tax law on the welfare of the Indonesian people. This paper uses the type of data that produces descriptive evidence, collects information about the relationship between variables, and deepens the data used in the study in this paper. This study uses secondary documents in the form of writing and figures from articles and news with trusted sites as the object of discussion in this report. The results show that taxes play a central role in Indonesia's economy, and the main source of state revenue is the income sector. Tax amnesty can be a solution to increase tax revenue by capturing new taxes and increasing public awareness about the importance of adherence to tax laws. Increased public awareness is needed so that facilities, education, services, and security can be improved to achieve better public welfare.
Legal Analysis of the Application of the Prudential Principle in the Safe Deposit Box Agreement between the Bank and the Customer Mariska Fitriliya; Dudung Hidayat; Jaenudin Umar
Interdisciplinary Journal of Advanced Research and Innovation Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Interdisciplinary Journal of Advanced Research and Innovation (Issue in Progres
Publisher : Ravine Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58860/ijari.v4i2.99

Abstract

The banking industry plays a strategic role in Indonesia's economy, and banks are legally obligated to apply the prudential principle in all their business activities, including Safe Deposit Box (SDB) services. However, a legal gap exists between this obligation and the practice of using unilateral exemption clauses in standard SDB agreements, which potentially harms customers and creates legal uncertainty . The research problem focuses on the research of legal provisions governing SDB as well as the implementation of the principle of prudence in the relevant agreements. The purpose of this research is to analyze the regulations and the strengthening of the application of the principle of prudence in order to ensure legal certainty for customers. The method employed was normative juridical, based on the theory of Soerjono Soekanto and Sri Mamudji, primarily using secondary data supported by limited empirical data obtained through interviews. The research findings indicate that the use of standard SDB agreement clauses by banks clearly violates Article 18 Paragraph (1) letter a of the Consumer Protection Law, Rendering such clauses null and void by operation of law. In practice, weaknesses persist in the application of this principle, particulary concerning the use of clauses that exempt banks from liability to customers. Although banks implement layered security Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) base on the principle of prudence, they may still be held legally accountable if proven negligent in maintaining the SDB security system.