Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 18 Documents
Search

TINJAUAN YURIDIS MENGENAI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HIBAH TERHADAP ISTRI KEDUA: (Studi kasus putusan PT Bandung NO.31/PDT/2020/PT.BDG) Pakpahan, Elvira Fitriyani; Heriyanti, Heriyanti; Adawiyah, Rodiatun; Yoshinaga, Yoshinaga; Tanjaya, Willy
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v4i2.435

Abstract

Salah satu cara untuk menguasai atau memiliki hak atas tanah adalah melalui proses hibah. Dalam hal pemberian hibah tidak boleh dilakukan secara sendiri/dibawah tangan, melainkan pemberian hibah harus dilakukan oleh/dihadapan pejabat yang berwenang dalam hal ini ialah Notaris dan/atau PPAT. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang melatarbelakangi pemberian hibah dan bagaimana status hukum tanah hibah yang disengketakan, alasan hakim dalam memutus perkara, dan akibat hukum mengenai penyelesaian sengketa hibah terhadap istri kedua yang dilakukan dalam putusan PT bandung No.31/PDT/2020/PT.BDG. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa faktor yang melatarbelakangi sesorang memberikan hibah kepada penerima hibah ialah faktor usia, faktor penghibah memiliki ahli waris lebih dari satu orang, dan faktor menghindari pajak ataupun tagihan lainya yang mungkin timbul atas aset dari penghibah tersebut. Mengenai status hukum tanah yang telah di hibahkan oleh seorang penghibah terhadap penerima hibah maka secara hak dan kewajiban atas tanah itu telah beralih ke si penerima hibah tersebut seketika itu juga ketika mereka telah bersepakat. Dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam perkara No.31/PDT/2020/PT.BDG adalah surat persil Nomor: 65 tahun 1988 Luas 4000m2 dan akta hibah no.2.414/2017 di hadapan Notaris. Akibat hukumnya adalah gugatan para pembanding/semula para penggugat tidak dapat diterima dan menyatakan bahwasanya akta hibah Nomor 2.414/2017 adalah sah dan berlaku.
Legal Review of Legal Protection for Bond Holding Investors (Case Study at Bank X) Willy Tanjaya
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5614

Abstract

The Capital Market has a quite promising role in the development of the Indonesian economy, namely as a source of financing for the business world and an investment vehicle for the community. One form of investment activity offered to investors in the capital market is bonds. Investing in bonds is not without risk, because the bond issuer may fail to pay its obligations. To protect investors from this risk of default, in the bond issuance process, the issuer involves a third party (trustee) who represents the interests of investors. This research is a normative-empirical juridical type. This research is descriptive. The data in this study consists of primary data and secondary data. The data collection instruments in this study are divided into two, namely primary and secondary data. Primary data was collected using the interview method, while secondary data collection used documentation studies. This study uses qualitative analysis techniques, because the data obtained is mostly qualitative data. The objective of this study is to analyze the application of legal protection for bondholder investors against the risk of default.
Renewal of Implementing Regulations in Minimizing Control in Limited Liability Companies Outside of Acquisitions Pakpahan, Kartina; Tanjaya, Willy; Ferina, Wulan Me
Batulis Civil Law Review Vol 5, No 3 (2024): VOLUME 5 ISSUE 3, NOVEMBER 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/ballrev.v5i3.2289

Abstract

Introduction: The problem is that the definition of "control" of a company is not found explicitly in the Company Law, resulting in the emergence of practices of "control" of companies which are carried out not in accordance with the provisions as stipulated in the provisions of Article 1 point 11 and Article 125 paragraph (3) of the Company Law. When taking over company shares, it does not always result in a change in control of the company if the number of shares taken over does not exceed 50% of the company's shares. If the takeover of shares exceeds 50% of the company's shares, the party taking over a company will become the controller of the party being taken over.Purposes of the Research:  The control intended by UUPT is very limited and cannot be interpreted more broadly. Methods of the Research: The research method used in this research is Empirical Legal Research, which uses a sociological legal approach focusing on reality by examining the application of law, in this case the PT UU, which is used as a basis for the formation and implementation of a Legal Entity (limited liability company).Results of the Research: The results of the research found the first fact that there were actions to control limited liability companies that were not in accordance with the provisions of Article 1 number 11 and Article 125 paragraph (3) of the Company Law and the aims and objectives of the Articles of Association of the Deed of Establishment were not achieved. These findings occurred at PT. ESG. Second, there is the involvement of a Notary in legalizing the actions of the Commissioner of PT. ESG to control PT. ESG Beyond Acquisitions. Third, there is a conflict between the norms of Article 102 paragraph 1 of the Company Law with Article 102 paragraph 4 of the Company Law regarding the "Requirement to seek approval from the GMS" to transfer assets, but the entire assets of PT. ESG has been transferred without asking for approval from the GMS and a Deed of Sale and Purchase Agreement and Transfer of Rights has been issued by a Notary.
Tinjauan Hukum Tentang Penerapan Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Dalam Hukum Bisnis Terhadap Penyelesaian Kasus Wanpestasi Tanjaya, Willy; Heriyanti; Wijaya, Ega Triwi
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 9 No 2 (2025): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia (Juli 2025)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/rynrzt05

Abstract

Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda adalah sebuah prinsip dasar dalam hukum kontrak yang menyatakan bahwa setiap perjanjian yang dibuat oleh para pihak yang bersepakat harus dipatuhi dan dilaksanakan dengan penuh tanggung jawab sesuai dengan ketentuan yang telah disepakati bersama. Hasil penelitian ini mengkaji tentang Penerapan Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda dalam Hukum Bisnis merupakan prinsip fundamental dalam hukum perjanjian yang menegaskan bahwa setiap perjanjian yang sah dan dibuat dengan kesepakatan bebas antar pihak, harus dipatuhi dan dilaksanakan sesuai dengan apa yang telah disepakati. Dalam konteks hukum bisnis, penerapan asas ini sangat penting karena memberikan kepastian hukum dan stabilitas dalam transaksi bisnis. Hal ini mengurangi risiko sengketa dan mendukung terciptanya hubungan bisnis yang profesional dan terpercaya.Pengaruh Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis berperan sebagai landasan untuk menyelesaikan sengketa bisnis yang melibatkan wanprestasi. Pihak yang melakukan wanprestasi dapat diminta untuk memenuhi kewajibannya sesuai perjanjian, membayar ganti rugi, atau bahkan membatalkan perjanjian tersebut. Penerapan asas ini memberi pihak yang dirugikan hak untuk menuntut pemenuhan kontrak atau ganti rugi, namun tetap dengan mengedepankan itikad baik dalam penyelesaian sengketa Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach). Bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan (library research) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach).
Antinomy Between Legal Certainty and Justice in the Public Housing Savings Program (Tapera) Heriyanti; Pakpahan , Elvira Fitriyani; Tanjaya, Willy; Siregar, Naek Martahan Hasudungan
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024): April
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2024.14.1.138-162

Abstract

People's Housing Savings (Tapera) is a government program for home ownership and housing for the community. The implementation of the Tapera program will only be carried out in 2027. However, both in terms of regulation and socialization, it seems rushed and is considered to cause injustice for low-income workers/laborers. The conflict between regulations regarding state efforts to provide housing for the community with mechanisms that are deemed burdensome to the community, on the one hand, causes injustice. So this study aims to find common ground between legal certainty and justice in the Tapera Program. This research is legal research that uses a legislative approach and a conceptual approach to discuss Tapera. Although this program aims to support housing financing, the amount of contributions as regulated in Government Regulation Number 21 of 2024 can cause polemics because it will affect the income of workers who have previously been deducted through Income Tax, BPJS Employment, and BPJS Health membership, and several other taxes or deductions set by the state. So, according to the theory of justice and the General Principles of Good Governance, this Tapera policy can harm justice. People's Housing Savings (Tapera) will be more suitable to be applied only to formal Workers/Laborers (both state and private) because it has a regular wage payment system. Meanwhile, for Independent Workers, it is better if this People's Housing Savings (Tapera) is not an obligation but rather only voluntary, meaning that the wishes of Independent Workers will decide whether to follow the People's Housing Savings (Tapera) program or not.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PIHAK KREDITUR AKIBAT RISIKO KREDIT DALAM TRANSAKSI FINTECHT BERBASIS P2P LENDING Leonard, Tommy; Sitompul, Natasia; Tanjaya, Willy; Esther, July
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.533

Abstract

The type of fintech peer-to-peer lending that has experienced the most growth in Indonesia is a type of financial technology that allows customers to get loans with simple, easy and fast procedures and does not require them to have collateral. But in reality, this fintech presents a very high credit risk. This is due to the efforts of fintech companies. as a coordinator when other financial institutions' standards are not met when evaluating buyers. Consequently, there is a need for preventive legal prescriptions and protection, especially for lenders. This is managed in the Financial Services Authority regulation Number.77.01.2016 regarding the implementation of information technology-based money lending and the Financial Services Authority regulation Number.1.07.2013 regarding Consumer Protection in the Financial Services Sector. Both of these regulations can be found on the official website of the Financial Services Authority (OJK). Lenders have sufficient legal protection thanks to these two POJKs, but additional legal protection is needed, particularly in the area of ​​credit risk reduction.
Juridical Review of Delayed Share Acquisition Notification Damaging PT. Sinar Mitra Compensated by PT. Orix Pakpahan, Elvira Fitriyani; Tanjaya, Willy; Azharuddin, Azharuddin; Affendy, Albert Ben
JURNAL AKTA Vol 11, No 3 (2024): September 2024
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v11i3.39278

Abstract

The purpose of this examination is to determine the principle of legal remedies for the decision of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) through a follow-up examination based on the Law on Refusal Procedures. This research case study uses the principle of justice in legal efforts to challenge the KPPU's decision. The data analysis method used in this study is a normative legal analysis method that compares norms. The normative legal method is used to explain the data that defines the legal norms contained in the legislation. The results of the data analysis of this study indicate the neglect of the principle of justice in judicial efforts against the KPPU's decision. In carrying out the burden of proof, if the parties are unable to provide actual evidence, it can cause inconsistency, but if the judge determines that it is not clear, the KPPU will provide evidence through additional examination of the judge's order. added and integrated. As a result, the resistance applicant was unable to strengthen his defense because he could not provide new evidence that could acquit the applicant.
Legal Analysis of Investor Protection in Corporate Green Bond Issuance Pakpahan, Elvira Fitriyani; Heriyanti, Heriyanti; Tanjaya, Willy; Pakpahan, Emir Syarif Fatahillah; Rizal, Said; Leonard, Tommy
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 14, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The global climate crisis has driven countries, including Indonesia, to adopt sustainable financing mechanisms that channel capital into environmentally responsible projects. One prominent instrument is the green bond—debt securities issued by corporations or institutions to finance projects with measurable environmental benefits, such as renewable energy, sustainable transport, and climate change mitigation. In Indonesia, green bonds are regulated by the Financial Services Authority (OJK) through Regulation No. 60/POJK.04/2017, which sets administrative requirements for issuance. While this framework marks an important step, it remains inadequate to guarantee strong investor protection. Current provisions do not establish clear enforcement mechanisms or effective sanctions against fund misallocation or project deviation, leaving investors vulnerable to risks such as greenwashing. The absence of mandatory third-party verification and the lack of supporting jurisprudence further undermine transparency, accountability, and the legal standing of investors. This research analyzes the extent of legal protection for investors in Indonesian corporate green bond issuances and evaluates the adequacy of existing regulations. It also proposes reforms—such as mandatory independent verification, explicit liability provisions, and the integration of national standards—to enhance safeguards for investors and strengthen market credibility. In the context of global momentum toward ESG-based investment and Indonesia’s commitments under the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), establishing a more comprehensive and enforceable legal framework is essential. Such a framework would not only ensure genuine environmental impact but also build investor confidence in Indonesia’s growing green finance market.