Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 30 Documents
Search

PERADILAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA: SUATU PERSPEKTIF MENURUT JURISPRUDENCE KEADILAN BERMARTABAT Prasetyo, Teguh; Kameo, J.
DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 15 Nomor 2 Agustus 2019
Publisher : Doctor of Law Study Program Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/dih.v15i2.2430

Abstract

Mungkin ada cukup banyak di antara warga masyarakat yang kurang menyadari, bahwa sesungguhnya telah tersedia suatu mekanisme penyelesaian perkara pelanggaran HAM dalam Sistem Hukum Pancasila. Demikianlah antara lain, latar belakang issue yang mendorong penulisan ini. Agar dapat digambarkan mengenai hukum acara peradilan HAM dimaksud, dibuatlah suatu penelitian hukum normatif yang sederhana. Penelitian seperti itu diinspirasi pemikiran dalam jurisprudence Keadilan Bermartabat atau teori Keadilan Bermartabat atau filsafat hukum Keadilan Bermartabat yang berpegang kepada postulat bahwa apabila orang mau mencari hukunya, dalam hal ini yaitu hukum yang mengatur tentang mekanisme peradilan HAM, maka hal itu harus dicari di dalam jiwa bangsa (Volksgeist) dari jurisdiksi itu. Jiwa bangsa dimaksud memanifestasikan diri dalam dua sumber utama, yaitu peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dan putusan-putusan pengadilan. Dalam penelitian ini, untuk menemukan hukumnya mengenai mekanisme penanganan perkara pelanggaran HAM hanya dicari dalam peraturan perudanng-undangan yang berlaku, berhubung hingga saat ini, belum ada putusan pengadilan, karena belum pernah dilaksanakan peradilan yang memeriksa mengenai objek sengketa peradilan HAM di Indonesia.
INITIATING LAW REFORM IN INDONESIA (FROM THE DIGNIFIED JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE) Indah S, Christina Maya; Prasetyo, Teguh
Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Vol 3 No 1 (2020): Februari 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (220.806 KB) | DOI: 10.30996/jhmo.v3i1.2981

Abstract

It is argued in this article that a study on the law reform of a country is the study which related to understanding of a scientific paradigm which made up of the basic idea of a country’s legal system. The main argument in this article is that the basic idea ofma legalmrefom on a legal system must be build upon the enforcement of the juridical principles found and developed in the system. This is derived from a postulate of the Dignified Justice teory perspective.In this view legal virtues underpinning a legal system are examined together as one system of principles and rules or a legal system. Philosophically, or it is a theoretical and a paradigm that law is believed as inseparable from the legal science itself. This philosophy has been developed to make a correction to the sociological jurisprudence perspective, which mainly argued that each occurence of social changes in a legal system cannot be answered by regulation alone. The sociological jurisprudence point of view argues that law is confined to the status quo of a society. Many has argued that this sociological indicative has occurred in many civil law systems, in particular Indonesia, to be used as its best prototype. In the Indonesian legal system, law is positioned as rules and regulations made by the legislative branch of the government. In this perspective laws has been excluded from humanity almost altogether. This article argues that Pancasila as the Indonesia Legal System is the way to solve this problem. Since Pancasila is used as the basis of the State and the source of all legal sources. For this reason, it is interesting to examine how the Pancasila actually became a basis of values in initiating the project of law reform in Indonesia.
TIPOLOGI TINDAK PIDANA EKONOMI DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN BERMARTABAT Prasetyo, Teguh; Kameo, Jeferson
Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune Volume 3, Nomor 2 Agustus 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jhbbc.v3i2.3479

Abstract

AbstractPeople in the society would have never been living afar from crime or misdemeanor. At the same time, people in the society have also never ceased to think and making every effort within the law to prevent and eradicate crimes and misdemeanors. Not only things such us found in this 21th century, which is the century accompanied with sophisticated telecommunication and information technology revolution. But also with all types of crimes and misdemeanor, or in this article has been given specific attention on the typology of crimes and misdemeanor which are essentially by nature business and economic, or in this article has been considered as the oldest crimes as old as mankind itself. Many kind of efforts to prevent or to eradicate the crime with rules of law have begun since the Garden of Eden, from there until this sophisticated telecommunication and information technological age the law has already been existed. In the essence, the law which governs the typology of handling all kinds of business and economic crimes and misdemeanor are themselves running from the basic ideas of contract, or the agreement based on Pancasila. In Indonesia, Pancasila is the First Agreement and the highest law in the legal system.Keywords: crime; dignified justice; economicAbstrakManusia dalam masyarakat tidak pernah hidup sepi kehidupannya dari kejahatan dan atau pun pelanggaran. Bersamaan dengan itu pula manusia di dalam masyarakat tidak pernah berhenti berpikir dan mengupayakan pencegahan, maupun penanggulangan kejahatan dan atau pun pelanggaran menurut hukum.Tidak saja seperti yang dapat disaksikan berlangsung di abad 21, yaitu abad yang penuh dengan kompleksitas kecanggihan revolusi teknologi informasi dan telekomunikasi. Namun, segala bentuk kejahatan, maupun pelanggaran, atau dalam artikel ini diberikan perhatian terhadap tipologi kejahatan dan pelanggaran yang bercorak Tindak Pidana Ekonomi (TPE) sudah sama tuanya dengan keberadaan manusia itu sendiri. Berbagai macam usaha untuk mencegah terjadinya tindak Kejahatan dan Pelanggaran maupun menanggulanginya dengan pengaturan berupa kaidah hukum sudah dimulai sejak taman Eden, di sana pun hingga zaman teknonologi informasi dan telekomunikasi super canggih ini sudah ada hukum untuk itu. Pada hakikatnya, hukum yang mengatur tipologi penanganan atas berbagai kejahatan ekonomi-bisnis dilakukan melalui kesepakatan atau Perjanjian. Di Indonesia, Kesepakatan atau Perjanjian Pertama tersebut tidak lain adalah Pancasila hukum tertinggi, dan sumber dari segala sumber hukum.Kata kunci: delik; ekonomi, keadilan bermartabat
RECONSTRUCTION OF CRIMINAL SANCTIONS PENAL CODE ACTORS ON ABORTION CRIME BASED ON THE VALUE OF JUSTICE Hanuring Ayu Ardhani Putri; Teguh Prasetyo; Sri Endah Wahyuningsih
The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Table Of Content
Publisher : The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020"

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Life is a gift given by God Almighty that must be respected by everyone. Life is given to every human being is a human rights that can only be revoked by the Giver of life. The right to life is one of the human rights that are set out in the Constitution of the State, as described in Article 28 (a) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in 1945 which states that "Everyone has the right to live and to defend life and living". With the right to life of the country will preserve and protect the right to life of every citizen so that the state through the state law enforcement tool will act if there is known to occur and the removal of the right to human life. Abortion (abortion) is always a conversation, either in forumresmi and unofficial concerning the fields of medicine, law and other disciplines. Abortion is not a new issue, abortion is an old problem that is always controversy. One of the controversies about abortion are the priority discourse of human rights as an excuse or reason for the pro-abortion cons of abortion. Lately case of abortion the fruit simalakama in Indonesia. On the other hand nonmedical abortion with reason is strictly prohibited in Indonesia but on the other side of illegal abortions increase the risk of death due to lack of medical facilities and infrastructure, even illegal abortions mostly done by traditional means which increase the risk of death. In Indonesia alone, although abortion is prohibited, but still many women who have abortions. Well done based on specific medical indication or performed by non-medical indications. Experts religion sees that whatever the reason, abortion is an act contrary to the religion, because it is taking the life of the fetus, which means murder, though no one argues that the life of the fetus did not exist before 90 days. Based on consideration of moral and social side, it's hard to let a mother who must care for unwanted pregnancies mainly as a result of rape, the result of commercial sex (with commercial sex workers) and women who know that the fetus has severe physical disabilities. Children born in the conditions and environment such that, in the future will most likely be knocked out of the social life is normal, lack of protection and affection that should be obtained by a child who had grown up in an environment that is fair, so it was likely the child will an outcast. On the other hand, in terms of religion, any religion would not allow men to commit acts termination of pregnancy for any reason, while in terms of the law, there are still debates and contradictions of the pros and cons about the perception or understanding of the laws that exist to date. Today many women became pregnant and had an abortion as a sign of moral degradation. Unwanted pregnancy is not a reason to kill the fetus. The fetus is a creature of Allah SWT. Why should be killed? What is wrong is not a rapist penzinanya or her fetus. The fetus also has the right to life. Legalize abortion is not the solution to reduce the number of maternal deaths. The amount will actually increase because there is the possibility of fetal owner claimed to be raped in order to be aborted. In consideration of hunger, abortion is permitted with some conditions. First, the fetus was detected suffering from a genetic defect that is born later is difficult to cure. Then, pregnancy due to rape were determined by a team competent in it, among others, the victim, a team of doctors and scholars. Terms of abortion due to rape, the age of the fetus can not be longer than 40 days. Criminal punishment against criminal abortion should be through the criminal justice procedure as formal criminal law or the law of criminal procedure. Criminal procedure law that can be formulated as a law establishing how the state uses its right to carry out criminal. Also commonly referred to as Concreto In criminal law, since it contains the rules of how the criminal law or criminal law materiel In Abstracto poured in reality. As known, the setting is a criminal offense in the Criminal Code a criminal abortion contained in the Penal Code Book II Chapter XIV On Crimes Against Life, in Article 299, Article 346, Article 347, Article 348, Article 349. To simplify and ease in this study, the focus directed primarily to the criminal sanctions to abortion.
HOMOLOGATION RECONSTRUCTION IN BANKRUPTCY THAT IS BASED ON DIGNIFIED JUSTICE Agus Winoto; Teguh Prasetyo; Amin Purnawan
The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Table Of Content
Publisher : The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020"

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Law No 37 Year 2004 on Bankruptcy and Liability Payment Postponement (PKPU) enables a debtor to come up with a settlement offer to the creditor, prior to or after bankruptcy, in order to pay for liabilities or end bankruptcy and PKPU. A settlement offer from a debtor, discussed and submitted after liability verification, which has been agreed and approved by both the debtor and the creditor must first be legalized by a panel of judges that decide on the case. This will give the settlement offer a fixed and binding legal status. Hence, it can be executed. However, the panel of judges do has the right to legalize a settlement offer agreed and approved by both the debtor and the creditor, as stipulated in Article 159 subsection (2) and Article 285 subsection (2) of Law no 37 Year 2004. This right to deny legalizing a settlement offer is against the universal principles of agreement, especially concerning mutual agreement, pactasuntservanda, freedom of contract, and common justice. The issues discussed in this research include (1) Why legalizing a settlement in the bankruptcy law does not reelect justice? (2) What are the consequences of legalizing a settlement in the bankruptcy law that does not reflect justice? (3) What is the law construction for legalizing a settlement in the bankruptcy law that is based on the values of justice? The method employed was judicial sociology. Data were collected from interviews, observations, and documentations. Those data were then analyzed using the interactive analysis method.  Results show that (1) Legalizing a settlement in both the bankruptcy law and PKPU is not yet based on justice values, especially the value of dignified justice based on Pancasila, namely Principles, 2, 4, and 5. (2) Hindrances in legalizing a settlement among others are; the agreement between a debtor and all creditors or most/the majority of creditors in a settlement offer is not recognized by the panel of judges; It is against the universal principles of agreement, especially the freedom of contract, the principle of pactasuntsevanda, and mutual agreement, and it does not recognize the deliberation between both the debtor and creditors, which is presided by a curator and a supervising judge and is in line with Principle 4 of Pancasila. (3) There needs to be a reconstruction for the ideal values of legalizing a settlement in bankruptcy law and PKPU, based on the values of dignified justice, that is aimed at protecting all parties involved in the settlement and PKPU.  Keywords: legalizing a settlement, bankruptcy law, PKPU, dignified justice 
RECONSTRUCTION OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL LAW (KUHAP) ABOUT THE DETENTION BASED ON JUSTICE Muhammad Khambali; Teguh Prasetyo; Sri Endah Wahyuningsih
The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Table Of Content
Publisher : The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020"

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Detention is a form of deprivation of freedom of movement a person. In the custody of a conflict between two principles, namely the right to move someone who is a human right that must be respected on the one hand, and the interests of public order on the other side of which must be preserved for the people or the people of evil deeds suspect or defendant. Therefore, the detention should be performed if necessary at all. Defects in detention can lead to things fatal to many parties, including anchoring.1 The provisions on the validity (rechwaardigheid) detention stated in Article 21 paragraph (4) Criminal Procedure Code, while the need to (noodzakelijkheid) detention stated in Article 21 paragraph (1) Criminal Code. Therefore, the competent authorities did or did not make an arrest (Article 20 of the Code of Criminal Procedure), the transfer of the type of detention (Article 22 of the Criminal Procedure Code), and the suspension of detention (Article 31 of the Criminal Code) against the suspect or defendant are at an institution or institutions, it provides opportunities for officials authorities detain, switching types of detention, detention suspend deviates by detaining suspects or defendants arbitrarily or even exceeds authority. Containment actions can also be used as a commodity "buy-sell" by detaining a suspect or defendant then "trade" to suspend the detention or transfer of the type of detention for the "price" certain. Researchers do research on the regulatory limit of detention, including the detention and transfer of the type of suspension of detention of suspects or accused general crime. Researchers interested in conducting research on detention, including the transfer of the type of detention and the suspension of the arrest of the suspect or defendant, which further analyze the passage and find construction rules detention of suspects or defendants in the Criminal Code.
RECONSTRUCTION OF CRIMINAL SANCTIONS AGAINST CRIME OF ACTORS AND MURDER MURDER IN PLAN BASED ON VALUE OF JUSTICE CRIMINAL CODE Maria Marghareta Titiek Pudji Angesti Rahayu; Teguh Prasetyo; Sri Endah Wahyuningsih
The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Table Of Content
Publisher : The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020"

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The increasing crime rate is influenced by several factors, from the nature of public welfare, until the little things like a matter of feelings. Indonesia as a country with dignity ensure the protection of the lives of every citizen, from being in the womb until the death. The results of this study were 1) In terms of Article 340 of the Criminal Code is a murder with the most severe criminal penalty, the death penalty. 2) The court's decision is considered to have a fair especially criminal sanctions imposed on the perpetrators, because it is actually the most disadvantaged in the event of a criminal offense is murder victim's family. 3) The murder plan to enter in the category of elements of murder which in the case of positive criminal law, Killing positive in the context of criminal law, categorized for the murder foreseen by the perpetrator, the murder because of persecution and murder due to negligence or neglect. Keywords: Reconstruction of Criminal Sanctions, Against Perpetrators of the Crime of Murder, Value of Justice.
Wawasan Kebangsaan di Era Globalisasi : Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat Teguh Prasetyo
Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian Vol 11, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian Volume 11 No 1 2017
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Memperkuat Ideologi Kebangsaan Melalui Perdamaian di Indonesia Teguh Prasetyo
PAX HUMANA Vol 2, No 3 Sep (2015)
Publisher : Yayasan Bina Darma

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (190.48 KB)

Abstract

This paper discusses how to strengthen cultural value that comes form the soul of Indonesian (political) nation (Volkgeist). This national value are universal and noble, and at the same time it also must harmonius with the law in Indonesia. Peace also emerge as one of the supporting value which could amplify constitutional and law practices. To achive it intention, this paper utilize Dignified Justice Theory which influenced from Indonesian wisdom and practices to analyze those values. This paper conclude that law enforcement in Indonesia must accelerate itself in order to uphold peace and unity of the nation, and actualize constitutional promises Keywords: Peace, National Value, Law
Putusan Hakim Tentang Pencabulan Anak Dibawah Umur Di Pengadilan Negeri Kota Pekalongan (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Negri Kota Pekalongan) Teguh Prasetyo
Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah Vol 13, No 1 (2018): March 2018
Publisher : UNISSULA Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/khaum.v13i1.2577

Abstract

AbstrakImplementasi dari ketentuan Pasal 81 dan Pasal 82 Undang-Undang Nomor : 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak ternyata terkadang tidak semudah apa yang tercantum dalam Undang-Undang tersebut. Terdapat hambatan atau kendala ketika majelis Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Kota Pekalongan mengadili perkara tindak pidana pencabulan/kesusilaan tersebut. Keadaan yang demikian kadang-kadang mempersulit untuk didapatkannya kebenaran materiil dalam proses penegakan hukum pidana. Dalam upaya menemukan dan menerapkan keadilan serta kebenaran maka Pengadilan Negeri Kota Pekalongan melalui Majelis hakim yang menyidangkan perkara aquo harus memiliki integritas tinggi agar dapat memberikan putusan yang mencakup aspek yuridis, aspek filosofis dan aspek sosiologis sehingga akhirnya dapat memberikan keadilan baik bagi korban maupun bagi terdakwa.Kata Kunci : Putusan Hakim, Pencabulan, Anak Dibawah Umur Abstract Implementation of the provisions of Article 81 and Article 82 of the Law Number 23 of 2002 on Protection to Chidren is apparently sometimes not as easy as what is stated in the law. There were constraints/obstacles when the Judges of Blora District Court tried/heard the criminal case of decency. Such circumstances are sometimes difficult to obtain the truth of material in criminal law enforcement process. In an effort to find and apply justice and righteousness, The Blora District Court through the judges trying the aquo case must have high integrity in order to issue a verdict covering juridical aspect, philosophical aspect and sociological aspect so that ultimately it can provide justice either for victims or for defendants.Keywords : Judge's decision,  obscene, Children Under Age