Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research

Atypical Pneumonia in the Elderly: A Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors, Treatment Outcomes, and Mortality Veghasanah Tanlie; Zarfiardy Aksa Fauzi
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v9i3.1225

Abstract

Background: Atypical pneumonia poses a significant threat to elderly individuals, often leading to severe complications and increased mortality. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate risk factors, treatment outcomes, and mortality associated with atypical pneumonia in elderly patients. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted from January 2013 to December 2024. Studies reporting on atypical pneumonia in patients aged 65 years or older were included. Data on risk factors, treatment outcomes (clinical cure rate, radiological improvement, length of hospital stay), and mortality were extracted and pooled using random-effects models. Results: Six studies involving 1,875 elderly patients with atypical pneumonia were included. Advanced age (≥80 years), comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, diabetes mellitus), and delayed initiation of antibiotic therapy were identified as significant risk factors for severe disease and mortality. Treatment with macrolides was associated with a higher clinical cure rate (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.52-3.04, p<0.001) and shorter hospital stay (mean difference -2.8 days, 95% CI -4.1 to -1.5, p<0.001) compared to fluoroquinolones. The pooled mortality rate was 12.8% (95% CI 9.5-16.1%). Conclusion: Atypical pneumonia in the elderly is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Early recognition of risk factors and prompt initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy, particularly with macrolides, are crucial for improving outcomes in this vulnerable population.
Tuberculosis with Drug-Induced Hepatitis: A Narrative Literature Review Sari, Riska Yuliana; Zarfiardy Aksa Fauzi
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v8i2.929

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease that is a global health problem. The problem is that 5-28% of patients receiving tuberculosis treatment suffer from drug-induced hepatitis on antituberculosis drugs (OAT). The clinical picture should be differentiated from other liver diseases. The level of symptoms varies from asymptomatic to symptomatic, such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, jaundice, hepatomegaly, and increased liver function. OAT use is stopped if clinical symptoms are found and ALT/AST increases ≥3 times, or if there are no symptoms but there is an increase in bilirubin ≥2 mg/dl or ALT/AST values ≥5 times without clinical symptoms. The use of OAT can be continued, but with supervision, if there are no clinical symptoms and the increase in ALT/AST is <2 times and the bilirubin value is <2 mg/dl. Treatment can be carried out again by reintroducing OATs one by one according to ATS recommendations.
The Relationship between COVID-19 Vaccination and the Severity of COVID-19 in Patients Treated for the Period August 2021 – August 2022 at Arifin Achmad General Hospital, Riau Province, Indonesia Ardiansyah, Muhammad Yudhi; Zarfiardy Aksa Fauzi; Rohani Lasmaria S
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 3 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v8i3.938

Abstract

Background: The use of the COVID-19 vaccine is very effective in controlling the pandemic, but it is important to know that no vaccine is 100% effective in preventing the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccination can make the disease milder so that the risk of infection, hospitalization, and death is lower in people who have been vaccinated compared to those who have not been vaccinated. This study aims to determine the relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and the severity of COVID-19 infection in patients treated at Arifin Achmad General Hospital, Riau Province, for the period August 2021 to August 2022. Methods: This study is an analytical observational research with a cross-sectional approach. A total of 403 research subjects were included in this study. Data analysis using Chi-square by looking for the relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variable. Ineligible bivariate data will be performed using the Fisher test with a p-value < 0.05 considered significant based on statistical tests. Results: The percentage of mild and moderate severity patients was generally the highest in the group who did not receive vaccination, with the percentage being 45.8%, followed by those who received booster (30.4%). Of the 54 cases of patients with severe-critical severity, 27 cases were dominated by patients who had no vaccination status at all, with a percentage of 50.0%. Subjects who did not receive vaccination had a 3.37 times higher chance of developing severe COVID-19 than those who were vaccinated (odds ratio = 3,37; 95% confidence interval [THERE] = 1,95-4,80). Conclusion: The relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and the severity of COVID-19 infection in patients treated at Arifin Achmad General Hospital, Riau Province, for the period August 2021 to August 2022.