Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Akta Perjanjian Jual Beli Rumah yang Dikeluarkan Berdasarkan Keterangan Palsu oleh Para Pihak : (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 433/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Mdn) Devira Ramadhani; Hasim Purba; Sutiarnoto
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 9 (2025): Tema Hukum Agraria dan Pertanahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.1369

Abstract

A notary’s official duties and authority are not solely for personal interest, but also serve the public interest. A notary is obligated to ensure the truthfulness of the deeds they draw up. Therefore, a notary is expected to act with honestly, fairness and transparency in preparing authentic deeds to safeguard all parties directly involved. This study employs a normative legal research method, using primary, secondary, and teriary legal materials, analyzed qualitatively. In the Courd Decision Number 433/Pdt.G/2021/ PN Mdn, the panel of judges considered that if a notary is proven to have knowingly or negligently include false information in a deed, this contitues both a violation of the notarical code of ethics and unlawful act. As a concequence, the notarial deed in question, being based on false statements, in declrared null and void by law.
Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum yang Dilakukan oleh Notaris dan Kreditur dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik: Studi Putusan Nomor :1048/PK/PDT/2022 Eklesia Novita Alverin Siagian; Hasim Purba; Sutiarnoto
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 4 (2025): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.1404

Abstract

A notary is a Public Official who is authorized to make Authentic Deeds. Notary in carrying out his/her position as a public official, when making a deed may include data or information originating from a fake letter/document into the deed. This incident can have legal consequences for both the deed made and the Notary who made the deed. The problem in this study is the unlawful act committed by the notary and the creditor in making an authentic deed. The Notary's liability for the authentic deed is in accordance with the decision. The research method used in this study is the type of Normative Juridical research. Normative Legal Research is a process of determining legal rules, legal principles, and legal doctrines to answer the legal problems faced. The Notary's liability in the event of an Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) on a deed depends on the problem at hand. If the Notary is proven to have committed an Unlawful Act together with one of the Applicants, then the Notary and the Applicant will bear all losses incurred on the deed, then the liability for the unlawful act is not only limited to liability for losses but also criminal liability.
Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Notaris terhadap Akta Partij Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) dan akta Partij Putusan Sirkuler Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas: (Studi Putusan Nomor 46/PDT.G/2023/PN CBI jo. 236/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Bdg jo. 141/Pdt.G/2018/PN Blb) Gusnia Hanako; Hasim Purba; Mahmul Siregar
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 4 (2025): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.1434

Abstract

This study examines the problems in the preparation of circular decision deeds and General Meeting of Shareholders deeds by notaries, particularly related to the lack of notarial neutrality and the failure to incorporate the parties' intentions into the deed, which renders the deed invalid. Using normative legal research methods with qualitative analysis, this study analyzes several court decisions and concludes that in Decision Number 46/PDT.G/2023/PN CBI and 236/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Bdg jo its cassation decision, as well as Decision Number 141/Pdt.G/2018/PN Blb jo its appeal and cassation decisions, the notaries were proven to have committed unlawful acts based on Article 1365 of the Civil Code for violating the Notary Position Law, although the researcher considers the decision in the second case to be inappropriate because the notary had exercised his authority in accordance with regulations by incorporating the parties' intentions into the deed.
Akibat Hukum Pengangkatan Anak terhadap Hak Mewarisi Melalui Penetapan Pengadilan Agama No. 57/Pdt.P/2019/PA.Lpk Noval Pra Ashari; Hasim Purba; Rosnidar Sembiring; Maria Kaban
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 6 (2025): Tema Hukum Keluarga
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i6.1565

Abstract

Abstract Child adoption is a practice that has long been carried out by Indonesian society, generally by married couples who do not yet have children, and is implemented in accordance with customs and laws and regulations. This normative legal research with descriptive analytical nature examines the legal system of child adoption, court validation, and the legal consequences arising using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches with qualitative analysis. The research results show fundamental differences between customary legal systems that sever blood relations between adopted children and biological parents, Islamic law and Law No. 35 of 2014 which do not sever such lineage relations. Child adoption requirements are regulated in Government Regulation No. 54 of 2007 and Social Affairs Minister Regulation No. 110/HUK/2009, where applications are submitted through social institutions then to the court to obtain a court decree if the specified requirements are met. The legal consequences of child adoption through court decisions show that adoptive parents only replace the role of biological parents in caring for, educating, and nurturing without severing blood relations, so that according to the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), adopted children are not included as heirs of adoptive parents but are entitled to obligatory bequests according to Article 209 paragraph (2), adoptive parents cannot become marriage guardians for adopted daughters and are not entitled to inherit from each other but may obtain obligatory bequests based on Article 209 paragraph (1), while adopted children still have blood relations with their biological parents and are entitled to inherit from each other according to the provisions of Articles 176-193 KHI.
Akibat Hukum Perbuatan Pendiri yang Tidak Merealisasikan Setoran Modal pada Perseroan Terbatas Shawina Widyandarie; Hasim Purba; Mahmul Siregar
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 4 (2025): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.1628

Abstract

Founders who fail to make capital contributions to limited liability companies create legal uncertainty because valid legal entity status requires proof of capital deposits. This research employs normative juridical methodology with statutory and library research approaches. The study concludes that founders must fulfill capital contribution obligations after company establishment to ensure legal certainty. Legal consequences of non-contribution constitute unlawful acts resulting in suspended shareholder rights and joint liability for damages. Founders must fulfill capital contribution responsibilities so that corporate organs can perform legal acts with legal certainty in company management.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap PPAT yang Diberhentikan Tidak Hormat dalam Keputusan MPPD dalam Kaitannya dengan Putusan MA No. 337 K/TUN/2021 jo. Putusan PK No. 65 PK/TUN/2023 Tumbur Yoel Rivaldo; Hasim Purba; Rudy Haposan Siahaan
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 4 (2025): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.2189

Abstract

PPAT, as an official who serves the public in land affairs, requires adequate legal protection. However, cases of unfair dismissal with disgrace by MPPD continue to occur, often disregarding settlements reached between the disputing parties. The limitations of MPPD's authority in imposing dismissal with disgrace based on the principles of proportionality and appropriateness; the legal standing of reconciliation between the complainant and the reported PPAT in relation to MPPD’s decision: and the forms of legal protection available to PPAT dismissed with disgrace based on the aforementioned court rulings. This research employs a normative legal research method. The results indicate that the authority of MPPD must be constrained by the principles of proportionality and appropriateness, considering the balance between the seriousness of the violation and the sanction imposed, as well as mitigating factors such as reconciliation and withdrawal of complaints. This study concludes that dismissal with disgrace without considering reconciliation and mitigating factors constitutes a violation of the principle of justice and may be annulled by the court.
Analisis Yuridis Perbuatan Wanprestasi atas Sengketa Pendaftaran Peralihan Hak atas Tanah dalam Jual Beli Tanah (Studi Putusan Nomor 27/PDT.G/2023/PN BJB) Rizka Putri Siregar; Hasim Purba; Rosnidar Sembiring
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 9 (2025): Tema Hukum Agraria dan Pertanahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i9.2271

Abstract

The sale and purchase of land that has not been followed by the transfer of land ownership certificates creates legal risks such as weak ownership, the loss of the buyer’s rights over the land, and the absence of guaranteed legal certainty and protection. This research employs a normative juridical method with a descriptiveanalytical approach. The results of the study indicate that land sale and purchase agreements in Indonesia represent an agreement between the seller and the buyer that gives rise to rights and obligations to transfer ownership rights. The juridical analysis of the judge’s considerations in Decision No. 27/Pdt.G/2023/PN Bjb shows that the sale and purchase of land is considered valid as a civil agreement because the legal requirements of a contract under Article 1320 and Articles 1457-1458 of the Civil Code have been fulfilled, namely mutual consent, legal capacity of the parties, a specific object, and payment of the agreed price.