Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Language, Literature, and Teaching

亚院三年级学生使用汉语形容词 AABB 与 ABAB 重叠式的偏误分析 MISTAKES OF USING THE ADJECTIVE REDUPLICATION AABB AND ABAB BY SEMESTER VI STBA-PIA STUDENTS Karina karina
Journal of Language, Literature and Teaching Vol 3, No 3 (2021): December - March (2022)
Publisher : Journal of Language, Literature and Teaching

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35529/jllte.v3i3.51-63

Abstract

This study aims to examine the types of errors found in the sixth semester students of STBA-PIA, and explain the factors that cause these errors. This study used a qualitative descriptive method design. Data collection techniques were carried out by elicitation and interview techniques. The results showed that the errors in the use of reduplication of AABB and ABAB adjectives by semester VI STBA-PIA students consisted of errors of omission of 28 sentences, errors of addition of as many as 28 sentences.18 sentences, error of selection is 58 sentences and error of ordering is 7 sentences. The total errors in the use of adjective reduplication are 111 sentences. The results of the analysis also prove that the factors that cause the error are interlingual factors and intralingual factors.Keywords: Error, Adjective Reduplication, AABB, ABAB.
《西游记女儿国》电影中使用的言语行为分析 PENGGUNAAN TINDAK TUTUR PADA FILM THE MONKEY KING 3 Karina karina; Wesley Kuandinata
Journal of Language, Literature and Teaching Vol 4, No 1 (2022): April - July 2022
Publisher : Journal of Language, Literature and Teaching

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35529/jllte.v4i1.21-35

Abstract

The study aims to describe the types of illocutionary speech acts and social factors of illocutionary speech acts in the film The Monkey King 3. Using qualitative descriptive research design and source of the data is the movie The Monkey King 3. Using documentation technique and the data analysis technique used consists of three stages, namely: data condensation, data presentation and drawing conclusions and induction techniques. Based on the results of data analysis are 22 illocutionary speech acts on love-topic communication and 14 illocutionary speech acts on hate-topic communication. The types of direct illocutionary speech acts in communication with the topic of love are 18 direct speeches and 4 indirect speech acts. Meanwhile, the types of indirect illocutionary speech acts in hate-topic communication are 12 indirect utterances and 2 indirect utterances. Factors that influence the use of speech acts in communication with the topic of love in the film The Monkey King 3 are the participant factors of 3 utterances; background factor 3 utterances; topic factor 8 utterances; function factor 8 utterances. Meanwhile, the factors that influence the use of speech acts in hate-topic communication in the film The Monkey King 3 are the participant factors of 5 utterances; background factor 1 speech; topic factor 2 speech; function factor 6 speech.Key Words: Pragmatics, Speech Acts, Social Factor, Love-Hate,                     The Monkey King 3
亚院二年级学生使用汉语时量补语的偏误分析 KESALAHAN PENGGUNAAN FRASE KOMPLEMEN DURASI PADA MAHASISWA STBA-PIA SEMESTER IV Karina karina; Nico Nico
Journal of Language, Literature and Teaching Vol 4, No 2 (2022): AUGUST - NOVEMBER 2022
Publisher : Journal of Language, Literature and Teaching

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35529/jllte.v4i2.1-13

Abstract

This study used descriptive qualitative research method to describe and analyze 16 students’ exercise while using Chinese complement of duration phrase. This study also used Miles, Huberman, and Saldana for the data analysis. According to Yang’s theory, Chinese complement of duration phrase has four common formulas, which are S1: S+V(+了)+时量补语(+了); S2: S+V(+了)+时量补语(+的)+O(+了)(O为一般名词); S3: S+V(+了)+O+V+时量补语(+了); S4: S+V(+了)+O+时量补语(+了)(O为人称代词/确定的人的名词. Each student was given 10 Indonesian sentences to translate into Chinese sentences using this phrase. According to the results, there were 37 error of omission sentences (49%), 34 disordering sentences (45%), 2 error of addition sentences (3%) and 2 error of substitution sentences (3%). Through interviewing these students, there was one factor that causes error in those sentences; it was intralingual factor in which students did not really understand to use complement of duration. Key Words: complement of duration phrase; Error analysis; Qualitative research