Hartoyo Hartoyo
Departemen Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen Fakultas Ekologi Manusia Institut Pertanian Bogor

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

KONDISI SOSIAL EKONOMI DAN TINGKAT KESEJAHTERAAN KELUARGA: KASUS DI WILAYAH PESISIR JAWA BARAT Istiqlaliyah Muflikhati; Hartoyo Hartoyo; Ujang Sumarwan; Achmad Fahrudin; Herien Puspitawati
Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen Vol. 3 No. 1 (2010): Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen
Publisher : Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (87.101 KB) | DOI: 10.24156/jikk.2010.3.1.1

Abstract

Family welfare is influenced by socio-economic factors like sociodemographic of family, family income, and position in society. This research compared characteristics and family welfare between fishermen families and non-fishermen families in coastal West Java. This research also analyzed the effect of social economy of family toward family welfare. This research involved 280 families as samples, consist of 157 fishermen families and 123 non-fishermen families. The research conducted in eight villages of four coastal subdistricts in West Java Province. The were no significant differences on family types, father’s and mother’s age, value of total assets, and per capita expenditure between fishermen and non-fishermen families. Father’s and mother’s education of fishermen families were significantly lower than father’s and mother’s education of non-fishermen families. On the contrary, family size and per capita income in fishermen families significantly were higher than nonfishermen families. Fishermen families had higher level welfare than non-fishermen families used World Bank and BPS’s poverty line indicators, but by BKKBN, poverty household criteria, and socio-metric indicators fishermen families had lower than nonfishermen families.
ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEJAHTERAAN KELUARGA PEMBUDIDAYA IKAN DAN NONPEMBUDIDAYA IKAN DI KABUPATEN BOGOR Hartoyo Hartoyo; Noorma Bunga Aniri
Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen Vol. 3 No. 1 (2010): Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen
Publisher : Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (134.779 KB) | DOI: 10.24156/jikk.2010.3.1.63

Abstract

Fish farmer families has non-permanent income to fulfill their daily needs. It caused dependence of fish cultivation productivity to capital and quality of environment. This study aimed to analyze welfare level and strategy to improve the family welfare of fish farmer families and to compare with non-fish farmer families. The study used cross sectional design and involved 70 families that consist of 40 fish farmer families and 30 non-fish farmer families as samples. Samples chosen by simple random sampling. The study conducted at Ciseeng Subdistrict, Bogor District from January 2008 until April 2008. The data was analyzed by t-test, chi-square, pearson correlation, sensitivity, specifity, and logistic regression. The welfare level of families that analyzed in this study, using indicators BPS, BKKBN, sociometric, and compound of three indicators. The result showed that only families asset that was significant different between fish farmer families and non-fish farmer families. Sensitivity and specifity analysis by BPS indicator as benchmark showed that sociometric indicator had higher sensitivity and specifity than BKKBN indicator, that was 66,7 and 96,7. Correlation analysis showed that there was significant correlation between BPS and sociometric indicator. Family size and family’s income effected significantly to welfare level of families.
ANALISIS MANFAAT DAN KEPUASAN PESERTA WANITA PROGRAM PUSAT KEBUGARAN DI KOTA BOGOR Elisa Diana Julianti; Hartoyo Hartoyo; Suprihatin Guhardja
Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen Vol. 1 No. 1 (2008): Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen
Publisher : Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (68.243 KB) | DOI: 10.24156/jikk/2008.1.1.77

Abstract

The objectives of the study were: to identify the socio economic characteristic of a female member, to analyze the expectancy and benefit of joining fitness center, to analyze the factors that influence the satisfaction of being member. The study was conducted in Bogor Municipality and purposive sampling was used to select 60 female member of fitness center who had been member for at least 2 months. The average age of the female was 30 years old and half of them were married. The proportion of an employed and unemployed female were equal, with the average income is about Rp 525,583.00. Most of them are senior high graduate and bachelor degree. The normal BMI of the respondents increased 11.1% (60% to 71.1%) after joining fitness center. To lose weight and to improve health condition were the reasons and expectations of most of the member. The Chi Square test showed that the expectations had a positive association with age and BMI, and no association with marital status. The benefits of joining the fitness center were improved health condition and endurance, lose weight, and have more friends. The study also found that respondent attitude significantly affects the satisfaction of joining fitness center.
ANALISIS ALOKASI PENGELUARAN DAN TINGKAT KESEJAHTERAAN KELUARGA (STUDI DI KECAMATAN MEDAN KOTA, SUMATERA UTARA) Armaini Rambe; Hartoyo Hartoyo; Emmy S Karsin
Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen Vol. 1 No. 1 (2008): Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen
Publisher : Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (95.899 KB) | DOI: 10.24156/jikk/2008.1.1.16

Abstract

In recent years, issues on family welfare are being discussed. One aspect is concerning family welfare indicator and measurement. There are three measures of family welfare, i.e., BKKBN, BPS, and subjective measures. In general, this research was aimed to determine expenditure allocation and family welfare status, and to compare three measurements of welfare status. Cross sectional design and survey method were applied for this research. District of Medan Municipality, with Sudirejo I Sub District, Medan, North Sumatera were chosen purposively as study area. In this sub district 2 areas were chosen at random and 100 families were selected as samples and drawn using Proportional Stratified Random sampling method. Data of family demographic and socioeconomics characteristic, food and non food expenditure, and subjective perception of family welfare were collected for 2 months from Augusts to September 2003. Mann-Whitney test, Chi square, multiple regression, sensitivity and specificity, logistic regression was used to analyze data. The result indicates that the average of non food expenditure of the relatively wealthy family was six times higher than poor family. There was a significant difference of the proportion of food and non food expenditure between poor and wealthy family. Education and income influenced significantly family expenditure. Using BPS criteria as gold standard, the three poverty/welfare indicators (BKKBN, food expenditure and subjective perception) had high sensitivity as many as 100.0. BKKBN and food expenditure criteria were the highest specificity as many as 63.3% and the lowest was subjective perception criteria (22.4%). The welfare determinant based on BPS criteria was the education of family head. The welfare determinant based on BKKBN criteria was family income. The welfare determinant based on food expenditure was the number of family members and income. The welfare determinants based on subjective perception were the education of family head, the age of family head, the perception of price and income. The poverty threshold as much as Rp 230,000.00 based on food expenditure considered the best and was chosen because it could classify poor family more than BKKBN criteria, and the education of family head with less than 13 years (the same as Senior High School level) also represented poverty indicator.