Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.036
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum PKn Progresif : Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Kewarganegaraan Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Sains dan Teknologi Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Manajemen El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Wissen: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Indonesian Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism and Diabetes (InaJEMD) JIMKI: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Kedokteran Indonesia
Dinda Aprilia
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Business Disputes in Electronic Transactions Policy in Indonesia Aloysius Wisnubroto; Dinda Aprilia
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.7036

Abstract

Economic activities conducted through internet-basedplatforms are generally referred to as electronic commerce (ecommerce). E-commerce offers significant advantages,particularly in terms of efficiency and convenience for bothconsumers and business actors. For consumers, e-commerceprovides ease of access to transactions without requiringphysical meetings, while for sellers, it reduces operationalcosts. However, despite these advantages, e-commerce alsoraises potential risks, particularly concerning the protectionof consumer rights, which may lead to disputes betweenconsumers and business actors. Consequently, the need foreffective and efficient mechanisms for dispute resolution ine-commerce transactions becomes imperative. Based on thisbackground, the research problem was formulated asfollows: How can business disputes in e-commerce beresolved based on the value of justice? To address thisquestion, the researchers employed a constructivistparadigm. The research design adopted was descriptiveanalytical, using a socio-legal approach. A socio-legalstudy integrates doctrinal legal analysis with insightsfrom social sciences. The data utilized in this studyconsisted of both primary data, collected through fieldresearch and interviews, and secondary data, obtainedfrom relevant literature and legal documents. Dataanalysis was carried out using qualitative descriptivetechniques. The findings of the research indicate thatonline arbitration represents a highly appropriatemechanism for resolving e-commerce disputes. This isdue to the inherent characteristics of e-commerce,which transcends geographical boundaries and allowstransactions to occur globally through internetconnectivity. In Indonesia, the legal frameworkgoverning e-commerce is primarily established underLaw No. 11 of 2008 on Information and ElectronicTransactions and Law No. 7 of 2014, particularlyChapter VIII concerning trade conducted throughelectronic systems. Nevertheless, the currentregulation on arbitration, namely Law No. 30 of 1999,remains limited to conventional arbitration and doesnot adequately address the unique challenges posed byonline dispute resolution. Therefore, it is crucial for thegovernment to formulate and enact new regulationsspecifically governing online arbitration as a disputesettlement mechanism in e-commerce. Such legal reforms are essential to ensure that dispute resolutionprocesses remain relevant and responsive to the rapidtechnological advancements shaping modern economicactivities. In this context, appropriate, clear, andenforceable legal measures are necessary to safeguardboth business actors and consumers, while promotingjustice and legal certainty in the digital economy.
Co-Authors Ade Agustina Afrido Hidayah Alexander Kam Alif Wahid Kamal Aloysius Wisnubroto Aman Simaremare Amelia Triashari Anggraini, Elya Siska Azizah, Dini Nur Cindy Agusyanti Claurisa Tri Milda Purba Dian Pertiwi Dini Julia Putri Elfira Yusri Eva Decroli Hanifuloh El’Aliy Harun Harnavi Lajuardi Putra Beheng Sinulingga Naufal Fathi Ashari Nurul Hikmah Sinaga Rahmat, Nia Aulia Rudy Afriant Russilawati Sahala Fransiskus Marbun SM Rezvi Sri Wahyuni Syaflita, Dina Syafril Syahbuddin Ulfa Dwi Anti Yovita Dwi Ananda Yustini Alioes Zulaikha Azizah