Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.687
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Hasanuddin Law Review JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review (GRLSPR) Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal Mediasas : Media Ilmu Syari'ah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah
Herdiansyah Hamzah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Politik Hukum Kewajiban Konsultasi dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Joko Satrio; Rosmini Rosmini; Herdiansyah Hamzah
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Agustus: Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v4i3.2366

Abstract

The independence of the General Elections Commission (KPU) as an election organizing institution is constitutionally guaranteed; however, in practice, KPU's authority to create regulations is often constrained by the obligation to consult with the People's Representative Council (DPR) and the Government. This study uses a normative legal method with a statutory approach to analyze the legal politics behind the consultation requirement between KPU, DPR, and the Government in the process of forming KPU regulations. The research findings indicate that this obligation is not based on a strong philosophical or legal foundation, but rather on DPR's concern about the possibility that KPU may refrain from consulting with them. Therefore, a change in phrasing from “must” to “may” in the consultation norm is necessary to restore KPU's position as a truly independent institution, in accordance with the constitutional mandate. This change will allow KPU to operate more freely and objectively in making decisions without unnecessary pressure or intervention, in line with the spirit of electoral reform that aims for greater transparency and accountability.
Inkonsistensi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Prinsip Open Legal Policy : Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Irwan Saputra Pajerih; Rosmini; Herdiansyah Hamzah
Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Desember:Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/birokrasi.v3i4.2804

Abstract

This article analyzes the inconsistency of the Constitutional Court's (MK) decisions regarding the application of the open legal policy doctrine, specifically focused on Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 concerning the minimum age requirements for Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidates. The purpose of this article is to examine the internal and external factors driving this jurisprudential shift and to evaluate its juridical and constitutional implications on the Indonesian legal system. The methodology employed is a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings prove that the Constitutional Court shifted its paradigm from judicial restraint to aggressive judicial activism, transforming its role from a negative legislator into a positive legislator by introducing new alternative norm criteria outside the legislative process. This inconsistency is internally driven by fragmentation in legal reasoning among constitutional judges and externally influenced by political pressure and institutional conflicts of interest. The decision ultimately weakens the legal certainty framework, erodes the checks and balances system, and triggers the judicialization of politics in Indonesia. This study recommends a conceptual reconstruction of the open legal policy boundary to restore the Court's integrity.
Co-Authors Agustina Wati Aprilia, Rizky Bonny, Michael Nicholas Dea Ananda Dillah, Dhea Farah Hasrul Insan Tajali Nur Irwan Saputra Pajerih Ivan Zairani Lisi Joko Satrio La Syarifuddin Muhammad Yuga Narita Damayanti Orin Gusta Andini Poppilea Erwinta Rini Apriani Rosmini Rosmini Rosmini Siti Sakinah, Siti YUNUS