Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.532
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Indonesian Journal of International Law Jurnal Atma Inovasia SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Media Bina Ilmiah Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra
Heri Hartanto
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Implikasi Hukum Hambatan Pengosongan Objek Hak Tanggungan terhadap Kepastian Hukum Pemenang Lelang yang Beritikad Baik Kusuma, Ari Surya; Kurniawan, Itok Dwi; Hartanto, Heri
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 12 (2025): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Desember 2025
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v4i12.5007

Abstract

The execution of mortgage rights through auction mechanisms should ideally provide legal protection and certainty for creditors and auction winners acting in good faith. However, in practice, the process of vacating the collateral object after the auction often faces legal and non-legal obstacles that prevent the auction winner from immediately taking physical possession of the object, even though ownership rights have been legally transferred through the auction minutes. This study aims to analyze the legal implications of these obstacles to eviction on the legal certainty of auction winners. The research uses a normative legal method with a legislative approach and a case approach through analysis of the Mortgage Law, SEMA, Minister of Finance Regulations, and court decisions. The results of the study show that the Mortgage Law does not explicitly regulate the mechanism for vacating the object after the auction, thus creating a normative vacuum and differences in interpretation in practice. Meanwhile, SEMA Number 4 of 2014 functions as a policy regulation and does not have substantive binding force. As a result, auction winners often experience delays in physical possession, cost losses, and legal uncertainty. This study concludes that regulatory updates are needed regarding the post-auction eviction mechanism, strengthening the authority of the implementing agency, and harmonizing procedural law so that protection and legal certainty for auction winners acting in good faith can be effectively realized.
Legal Protection for Buyers in Good Faith in Private-Deed Land Sales: The Dialetic of Certainty and Justice Lestari, Novi Sri; Cahyaningsih, Diana Tantri; Hartanto, Heri
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/019mks83

Abstract

This article examines legal protections for bona fide buyers in informal land transactions, referencing Cirebon District Court Decision Number 59/Pdt.G/2022/PN Cbn as a key legal basis. It focuses on the conflict between the formal land registration regime outlined in Article 19 of Law No. 5 of 1960 and Article 37 of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997, which mandates a PPAT deed, and the reality of community-based informal transactions. The study employs a normative juridical approach, including legislative, case, and conceptual analyses, along with prescriptive-argumentative methods to interpret the judge's considerations. Findings indicate that the court evaluated the agreement’s validity, the seller's authority, payment status, and the plaintiff’s control over the property as grounds for ratifying the transaction. As a good-faith purchaser, the plaintiff deserves legal protection, making the decision a means to legitimize administrative processes judicially. This ruling promotes substantive justice and legal certainty by updating land registration data and highlights a regulatory gap: protection currently relies on litigation rather than preventive administrative measures. Strengthening administrative legalization procedures for private transactions and establishing normative criteria for good-faith buyers are crucial steps toward achieving just and certain land law in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Adiastuti, Anugerah Agung Wijayanto Bagyo Mulyono Chatarina Umbul Wahyuni Diana Tantri Cahyaningsih Edy Suprayitno, Edy Emmy Latifah Erick Augusta Irawan Harjono Harjono Ismawati septiningsih ITOK DWI KURNIAWAN Kadek Evinka Yuristin, Kadek Evinka Kusuma, Ari Surya Lestari, Novi Sri Maheswari, Yoan Amadina Sapto Hermawan Setiyawan, Anang Sunny Ummul Firdaus Utomowati, Rahning Zakki Adhliyati