Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2020 - 2025

2.426

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Masalah-Masalah Hukum FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Arena Hukum Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Diponegoro Law Review Pembaharuan Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum JURNAL HUKUM dan KENOTARIATAN Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Yuridika Perspektif Hukum

Hanif Nur Widhiyanti

Brawijaya University

Author-ID : 2804799

Religion Arts Humanities Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

1 2 3

ANALISA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DALAM PROSES AKUISISI BERDASARKAN PASAL 126 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 Maya Sari; Abdul Rachmad Budiono; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 2, No 2 (2017): Desember 2017
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (69.485 KB)

Abstract: This paper aim to analyze the legal implications of legal conflicts between Article 126 paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 of UUPT.Article 126 paragraph (1) of Law no. 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability Company (UUPT) states that the acquisition process should consider the interests of minority shareholders. But in article 126 paragraph (3) UUPT that the business undertaken by minority shareholders under Article 62 UUPT does not stop the acquisition process. It appears that the UUPT has not yet provided legal protection for minority shareholders and there is a legal conflict between Article 126 paragraph (1) of the Company Law which wishes to provide legal protection to minority shareholders and paragraph (3) of the article which illustrates that the shareholders' Minorities do not stop the acquisition process. By approach of legislation and case approach, the result is that there is no legal certainty over legal efforts by minority shareholders in using the voting rights in accordance with the shares they hold when the minority shareholders do not approve the acquisition. UUPT has not provided clear legal protection for minority shareholders so that in the process of acquisition of minority shareholders is impairedAbstrak: Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum terhadap konflik hukum antara pasal 126 ayat 1 dan ayat 3 dari UUPT. Pasal 126 ayat (1) UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT) menyatakan bahwa proses akuisisi harus memperhatikan kepentingan pemegang saham minoritas. Tetapi pada Pasal 126 ayat (3) UUPT tersebut menyatakan bahwa usaha yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas berdasarkan Pasal 62 UUPT tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Terlihat belum konsistennya UUPT memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham minoritas dan terlihat adanya konflik hukum antara Pasal 126 ayat (1) UUPT yang ingin memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang saham minoritas dan ayat (3) dari pasal tersebut yang menggambarkan bahwa upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Kajian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus diperoleh hasil bahwa tidak adanya kepastian hukum atas upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas dalam menggunakan hak suara sesuai dengan saham yang dimilikinya ketika pemegang saham minoritas tidak menyetujui dilakukannya akuisisi. UUPT belum memberikan perlindungan hukum yang jelas bagi pemegang saham minoritas sehingga dalam proses akuisisi pemegang saham minoritas dirugikan DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v2i22017p115

Kajian Yuridis Pengesampingan Pasal 1266 dan Pasal 1267 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Sebagai Syarat Batal Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan Rocky Marciano Ambar; Budi Santoso; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum Vol 3 No 1 (2017): Diversi Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS ISLAM KADIRI

Banks in the redit agreement use more standardized credit agreements, the use of standard contracts in the banking credit agreement is based on 2 (two) things, (1) The existence of unbalanced position (berganing position) between banks and the debtor, the bank has a more dominant position than the debtor. (2) There is an understanding of the principle of freedom of contract absolutely and indefinitely so that the bank has absolute freedom to determine the form and content of the agreement. So banks can freely to determine the form and contents of the agreement included in the clause of the terms of void wanprestasi arranged to include mengesaampinkan Article 1266 and Article 1267 Civil Code in the agreement. Whereas the provision of Article 1266 of the Civil Code provides that in the event that the revocation of the treaty must be requested by the court and the judge through the decision of the court may determine the types of compensation for the parties. Based on the background, then as for the formulation of the problem of writing is (1). Whether the inclusion of clause 1266 and Article 1267 of the Civil Code in the credit agreement of the banking system has fulfilled the principle of equilibrium and justice. (2) What is the juridical implication of the inclusion of clauses which exclude Article 1266 and Article 1267 of the Civil Code in the credit agreement pertaining to the debtor's right in the process of settling the interpretation as a condition of cancellation of the agreement. The research method used is normative juridical research. The result of this research is the waiver of Article 1266 and Article 1267 of the Civil Code which regulates the waiprestasi void in the agreement and the types of indemnity is contrary to the principle of fairness and the principle of equilibrium. The principle of justice according to Rawls is that it is unfair to sacrifice the right of one or more persons only for the sake of greater economic gain and even justice must be understood as fairness, in the sense of "equality of positions and rights" not in the sense of "commonality of results" people, in other words justice as intended is justice that provides a guarantee of equality and rights between the bank as a creditor with the customer as a debtor in the credit agreement of the bank. As for the juridical implication of the inclusion of clauses that exclude Article 1266 and Article 1267 of the Civil Code of credit agreement relating to the debtor's right in the process of settling the interpretation as a condition is to remove the legal rights as well as the debtor's legal efforts in seeking justice and the equilibrium position which is not dominant by the decision maker due to the unbounded imbalance of the parties to the agreement. The act of wanprestation brings consequences to the adversity of the disadvantaged party to prosecute the defendant to indemnify, so that by law it is expected that none of the parties will be harmed by the default.

TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS TERHADAP AKTA YANG CACAT HUKUM DAN TIDAK SESUAI DENGAN KETENTUAN PEMBUATAN AKTA DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG JABATAN NOTARIS Eudea Adeli Arsy; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti; Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 6 Nomor 1 September 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/jbmh.v6i1.324

ABSTRAK Permasalahan yang dianalisis adalah mengenai tanggung jawab seorang notaris terhadap akta yang dianggap cacat hukum dan tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan pembuatan akta dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Hal tersebut dilatar belakangi oleh kasus yang sebagaimana dicantumkan pada pendahuluan dimana akta yang dibuat tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan Undang-Undang. Hal tersebut dinyatakan melanggar pasal 44 Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan oleh penulis dalam penelitian ini adalah jenis penelitian normatif dengan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Metode pengambilan data dilakukan dengan menganalisis Undang-Undang jabatan Notaris dan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Cibinong Nomor 25/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Cbi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian tersebut maka, diketahui tanggung jawab notaris terhadap gugatan yang diberikan oleh penggugat, juga menganalisis putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Bandung tersebut relevan atau tidak dengan gugatan yang diajukan oleh penggugat. Rekomendasi atau saran untuk Notaris 1) Untuk lebih teliti dalam membuat akta sewa menyewa yang sesuai dengan ketentuan Undang-Undang, 2) Untuk lebih memperhatikan ketentuan pembuatan akta dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Kata kunci: akta notaris; tanggung jawab notaris; undang-undang jabatan notaris. ABSTRACT The issue of a notary's responsibility for deeds that are considered legally flawed and not in accordance with the provisions of the making of deeds in the Notary Department Law. This is motivated by a case as stated in the introduction where the deed made is not in accordance with the provisions of the Act. This is stated to violate article 44 Notary Department Law. The type of research used by the authors in this study is a type of normative research with normative juridical research methods. The method of data collection is carried out by analyzing the Notary Office Law and the Decision of the Cibinong District Court Number 25/Pdt.G/2017/PN. Cbi. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the responsibility of notaries to the lawsuit provided by the plaintiff, can also analyze whether the Bandung High Court's decision is relevant or not to the lawsuit filed by the plaintiff. Recommendations or suggestions for Notaries 1) To be more careful in making a lease deed in accordance with the provisions of the Law, 2) To pay more attention to the provisions of the making of deeds in Notary Department Act. Keywords: notary deed; notary responsibility; notary department act.

Dugaan Delik Penodaan Agama dalam Pemulasaraan dan Penguburan Jenazah Akibat Covid-19 Isnaini Imroatus Solichah; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 2 No 10 (2021): Tema Hukum Kesehatan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Since the WHO declared that the Covid-19 outbreak had reached the level of a global pandemic, it had prompted governments in many countries to take urgent and aggressive action to immediately stop the spread of the deadly virus. Various policies are made and implemented by the governments of each country to control the spread of the disease. One of the concerns in Indonesia, where the majority of the population is Muslim, is the policy for the burial of corpses due to Covid-19. Taking into account that the corpse of a Covid-19 patient is a corpse infected with a contagious disease and must be handled specifically to protect the burial officers by still paying attention to the provisions of Shara' which are the rights of the corpse.

Perlindungan hukum kreditor yang memegang hak tanggungan dalam kepailitan Mukhamad Khabib Risvian; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti; Reka Dewantara
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 13, No 1 (2022): April 2022
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v13i1.7438

The purpose of this paper is to overcome future problems, Law No. 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage on Land and Objects Related to Land and Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Obligation to Pay Debts. Preventive and Repressive Legal Protection actions, however, a problem or conflict of law arises which regulates the time limit which is the source of problems between the Mortgage Law and the Bankruptcy Law, thus confusing stakeholders. The Bankruptcy Law provides a time limit of 2 months or 90 (days) after the bankruptcy decision is given and must be given to the Curator. but it is felt that it does not provide sufficient time for the Creditor of the Mortgage Holder. Because the creditor rights holders have protected their rights by the Mortgage Law which is written in article 21 of the Mortgage Law. Within 2 months, it does not mean that the creditor has to complete the execution, but within that period the creditor has started the execution process. due to the process that must be passed by the Mortgage Holder to sell the Mortgage Object.How to cite item: Risvian, MK., Widhiyanti, HN Dewantara, R (2022). Perlindungan hukum kreditor yang memegang hak tanggungan dalam kepailitan. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(1). doi:10.26905/idjch.v13i1.7438.

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS YANG TIDAK DILIBATKAN DALAM PROSES AKUISISI Maya Sari; Abdul Rahcmad Budiono; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
Yuridika Vol. 32 No. 3 (2017): Volume 32 No 3 September 2017
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Acquisition as a form of corporate restructuring that is carry out to overcome the situation of financial difficulties or improve the performance of the company as a whole or part of the business unit. In Article 126 paragraph 1 of Laws of the Republic of Indonesia number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Company stated that the acquisition process should consider the interests of minority shareholders. However, sometimes acquisition decisions have already been decided in advance by the majority shareholder without involving minority shareholders. Based on this, this paper intends to analyze the form of legal protection for minority shareholders who are not involved in the acquisition process. Through the approach of legislation and case approach, it is found that Laws of the Republic of Indonesia number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Company has not provided enough legal protection to minority shareholders. The decision-making process of acquisition in the General Meeting of Shareholders should be procedurally and substantively in accordance with Laws of the Republic of Indonesia number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Company. It is intended that minority shareholders have the opportunity to exercise their voting rights even though they do not have to be the party controlling the company.

Kajian Yuridis Pengesampingan Pasal 1266 dan Pasal 1267 Kitab Undang -Undang Hukum Perdata sebagai Syarat Batal dalam Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan Rocky Marciano Ambar; Budi Santoso; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
Perspektif Hukum VOLUME 17 ISSUE
Publisher : Faculty of Law Hang Tuah University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/ph.v17i1.59

Banks in credit agreements use more standard agreements, standard contracts in 2 (two) things, (1) There is an unbalanced position between banks and debtors, banks that have a more dominant position and debtors. (2) There is an understanding of the principle of freedom of contracting and without limits. The Bank has the freedom to seek the form and content of the agreement. Code of Ethics in agreement. The provisions of the Civil Code provide types of compensation for parties. Based on the background, then for problems the problem is written (1). Does the inclusion of Article 1266 and Article 1267 of the Civil Code on the banking system have collected the principles of balance and justice. (2) What are the legal implications of the exclusion clause. The research method is normative juridical research. The result of this research is the neglect of civil law and the principle of compensation is the principle of balance. The basic principle according to Rawls is that it is unfair or more people. in the sense of "freedom of results", in other words. is the nature of the debtor in a bank credit agreement. For the legal implications of the clause that excludes Article 1266 and Article 1267 of the Civil Code concerning the right of the debtor to the debtor. Legal efforts in finding and resolving problems that cannot be made by a decision due to the imbalance of the parties in the agreement. For people who make changes, no party will be harmed.

Indonesia Obligation to Repatriate Nationals Who Had Joined the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria Hanif Nur Widhiyanti; Mukhlisa Ilman Nafiah Medianto
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 16 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no2.2574

According to the Montevideo Convention of 1993, the requirements for founding a state are fulfilled possession of people, a region, government, capability to relate to other states, and recognition of sovereignty from other states, making it still debatable whether ISIS can be considered a state or a belligerent organization. Islamic State of Iraq and Syria claim that they possess people, a region, and a government, but in reality, they cannot make diplomatic relations with other states. The National Counter-Terrorism Agency (BNPT) has declared ISIS a radical and terrorist movement. Based on BNPT and Detachment 88 data, it is suspected that 1,276 Indonesian nationals have joined ISIS, and only approximately 297 Indonesian nationals possess Indonesian passports. A debate arises regarding whether the state of Indonesia becomes responsible for its presence and whether they still possess the status of Indonesian nationals. This article is written as the results of normative juridical research that analyzes how the state is responsible for repatriating Indonesian nationals who have joined ISIS. The research found that the nationals who joined ISIS may be categorized as Foreign Terrorist Fighters. Nonetheless, international law does not regulate the nationality status of an individual when the individual becomes a part of FTF. In principle, each state can determine the regulations that organize the acquisition and deprivation of a person's nationality; in other words, the nationality status of FTF who joined ISIS entirely depends on the national law of each state. Therefore, the government of Indonesia still possesses responsibility for returning (repatriating) WNI who have joined ISIS.

PENDEKATAN PER SE ILLEGAL DAN RULE OF REASON DALAM HUKUM PERSAINGAN (PERBANDINGAN INDONESIA-MALAYSIA) Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
Arena Hukum Vol. 8 No. 3 (2015)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

AbstractApproach to the nature of illegal per se and rule of reason prohibition has long been applied in determining whether an act hinder competition or not. Competition law of Indonesia and Malaysia also implement a ban properties per se illegal or rule of reason, but did not mention explicitly in the formulation of laws and regulations. The unfirm arrangement model imposes a difficult responsibility for institution of business competition authorities to be able to precisely define the reference as a measure that should be used in assessing an anti-competitive act. This research is a normative law with legislation approach and comparative law. From the discussion, it was concluded that the application of the nature of illegal per se and rule of reason prohibition in Law No. 5 of 1999 and the Competition Act 2010 of Malaysia implemented through an assessment of how the result level of an anti-competitive actions capable of distorting the market and blocking, thus eliminating competition completely. Consideration was also made based on the alignment between normative rules in the Act with the basic theory of competition itself. Thus, the rule of law in the enforcement of competition law can be maintained.Key words: competition, per se illegal, rule of reasonsAbstrakBaik pendekatan sifat larangan per se illegal maupun rule of reason telah lama diterapkan dalam menetapkan apakah suatu perbuatan menghambat persaingan ataukah tidak. Hukum Persaingan Indonesia dan Malaysia pun menerapkan sifat larangan per se illegal atau rule of reason namun tidak menyebutkan secara tegas dalam rumusan peraturan perundang-undangannya. Model pengaturan tidak secara tegas tersebut, telah membebankan sebuah tanggung jawab yang tidak mudah bagi lembaga otoritas persaingan usaha untuk mampu secara tepat mulai dari menentukan acuan sebagai ukuran yang harus digunakan dalam menilai sebuah perbuatan anti persaingan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan perbandingan hukum. dari hasil pembahasan disimpulkan, penerapan sifat larangan per se illegal ataukah rule of reason dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 dan Akta Persaingan 2010 Malaysia ialah selain melalui sebuah penilaian bagaimana tingkatan akibat dari sebuah perbuatan anti persaingan mampu mendistorsi pasar dan menghalangi hingga menghilangkan persaingan sama sekali. Pertimbangan juga di dasarkan kepada keselarasan antara peraturan normatif dalam Undang-Undang dengan teori dasar persaingan itu sendiri. Dengan demikian kepastian hukum dalam penegakan hukum persaingan dapat terus ditegakkanKata kunci: persaingan, per se illegal dan rule of reason

REFORMULATION OF REGULATIONS ON INDONESIAN CITIZENS WHO HAD JOINED THE ISLAMIC STATE OF IRAQ AND SYRIA (ISIS) Riana Susmayanti; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti; Muhammad Fadli Efendi
Arena Hukum Vol. 16 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01602.5

The repatriation of ex-ISIS members to Indonesia will have an impact on the community, because previous jihadi alumni from Afghanistan carried out terrorist bombings in several locations after they returned to Indonesia. This research will analyze the classification of Indonesian citizens who had joined ISIS; the Indonesian citizens who had joined ISIS according to Indonesian regulations and the reformulation of regulations on Indonesian citizens who had joined ISIS. This normative juridical research uses statutory approach and conceptual approach. The results of this study shows that the classification of Indonesian citizens who had joined ISIS based on hierarchy in the organization and concerned involvement in ISIS, the regulatory violations committed by Indonesian citizens by joining ISIS, and the urgency of changing the citizenship law that applies to Indonesian citizens who join ISIS.

Co-Authors Abdul Rachmad Budiono Abdul Rahcmad Budiono Adheria Juniresta Anak Agung Ayu Nanda Saraswati Arifuddin Arifuddin Aufa Fajrul Hikmah Erna Anggraini Erna Anggraini Eudea Adeli Arsy Hariyanto Susilo Isnaini Imroatus Solichah Maya Sari Maya Sari Muhammad Fadli Efendi Mukhamad Khabib Risvian Mukhlisa Ilman Nafiah Medianto Musyarrofa Rahmawati Nur Chanifah Panca Basuki Rahmat Panca Basuki Rahmat Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto Pungki Febriana Dheyanoor Rachmadani Eka Husnul Khotimah Reka Dewantara Riana Susmayanti Rocky Marciano Ambar Rocky Marciano Ambar Santoso, Budi Siska Ambarwati Sofwan Rizko Ramadoni Sukarmi, Sukarmi Sylvia Mufarrochah Thohir Luth Warkum Sumitro Yuliati Yuliati

Title

Found 22 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 22 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 22 Documents
Search