Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.325
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AKADEMIKA Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi) Jurnal Al Himayah POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Journal La Sociale At-Tanwir Law Review
Ismet Hadi
Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Legal Certainty in Regulating Vice Ministers’ Concurrent Positions: Implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 128/PUU-XXIII/2025 for Executive Governance Salahudin Pakaya; Moh. Fadli; Ismet Hadi
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v13i1.14482

Abstract

This article examines the legal certainty implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 128/PUU-XXIII/2025, which extends the office incompatibility rule in Article 23 of Law No. 39 of 2008 on State Ministries to vice ministers. Using doctrinal legal research with statutory, case, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this article reconstructs the Court’s ratio decidendi and evaluates the ruling through four indicators of legal certainty: normative clarity, institutional coherence, predictability, and administrability. The analysis shows that the decision strengthens normative clarity by closing a statutory gap that previously allowed vice ministers to hold concurrent positions in state owned enterprises, private companies, or publicly funded organizations. Yet the ruling also creates implementation risks because the transitional period may invite fragmented compliance, administrative delay, or selective enforcement. This article argues that legal certainty after the decision depends not only on the Court’s interpretation, but also on concrete executive follow up. Its novelty lies in developing a compliance framework consisting of normative clarification, institutional mapping, transitional safeguards, and verifiable replacement mechanisms to align constitutional supremacy, executive accountability, and state owned enterprise governance.
Administrative Enforcement of Electoral Violations in Indonesia: Redesigning Institutional Authority for Effective Election Governance Salahudin Pakaya; Ismet Hadi
Publik : (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi) Vol 12, No 2 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31314/pjia.12.2.171-189.2023

Abstract

Structure that assigns the General Election Supervisory Agency, or Bawaslu, extensive authority over prevention, supervision, examination, sanctioning, and adjudication. The diversity of administrative misconduct, however, is not consistently matched by differentiated enforcement procedures, creating risks of excessive proceduralization for correctable violations and inadequate protection when governmental action directly affects electoral rights. This study examines the institutional configuration of administrative electoral enforcement and formulates an alternative governance model through qualitative legal and institutional analysis. The research examines electoral legislation, Bawaslu regulations, documented administrative violation practices, and peer reviewed literature concerning electoral management, administrative enforcement, institutional capacity, and election governance. The findings identify three structural problems: functional concentration within Bawaslu, insufficient differentiation between compliance restoration and rights adjudication, and the absence of systematic criteria for determining enforcement intensity. This study proposes a Differentiated Administrative Enforcement Model comprising the Corrective Compliance Track, Proportional Administrative Sanction Track, and Rights Protection Adjudication Track. Case allocation is determined through six variables consisting of legal actor, direct legal harm, seriousness, reversibility, recurrence, and electoral urgency. Functional separation between examination and adjudication complements this structure without requiring a new electoral institution. The model demonstrates that effective election governance requires administrative responses that are proportionate, timely, accountable, and capable of protecting electoral rights
Co-Authors Desi Andella Fitri Usman Moh. Amin Dali Mohamad Ilyas Abas Mohamad, Irwansyah Reza Mohammad Fadli Novita Kesola Noviyanti, Upik Dyah Eka Salahudin Pakaya Salahudin Pakaya Sitti Magfirah Makmur Suslianto Suslianto Suslianto Suslianto Suslianto Suslianto