Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.756
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pro Bisnis Turbo : Jurnal Program Studi Teknik Mesin Infoman's: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Manajeman dan Informatika Journal of Leadership in Organizations Journal of Innovation Information Technology and Application (JINITA) Jurnal Fokus Manajemen Bisnis Jurnal Pewarta Indonesia Abditeknika - Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat BISMA (Bisnis dan Manajemen) Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan Jurnal Pengabdian Mitra Masyarakat (JPMM)
Nurfaizal, Yusmedi
Universitas Amikom Purwokerto
Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL MEDIATION AND PEER SUPPORT MODERATION IN ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTION Yusmedi Nurfaizal; Mugiarti Mugiarti
Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan Vol. 28 No. 1 (2026): MARCH 2026
Publisher : Management Study Program, Faculty of Business and Economics, Petra Christian University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.9744/jmk.28.1.78-92

Abstract

Entrepreneurial intention research remains fragmented, often emphasizing isolated personal traits while overlooking the psychological and social mechanisms that translate capabilities into sustained entrepreneurial drive. This study addresses that limitation by examining how creativity, risk taking propensity, and digital literacy influence entrepreneurial intention through psychological capital, with peer support acting as a contextual amplifier. Using survey data from 250 undergraduate students and analyzed via PLS-SEM, the findings demonstrate that psychological capital serves as a pivotal resource mechanism converting individual competencies into entrepreneurial motivation. Moreover, peer support strengthens the capacity of psychological capital to shape intention, highlighting the interactive role of internal and external resources. The study advances the literature by repositioning psychological capital from a mere predictor to a mediating engine that channels capabilities into intention, while conceptualizing peer support as a boundary condition that enhances resource deployment. Theoretically, this refines resource based and social capital perspectives by integrating personal competencies, psychological assets, and social context into a unified explanatory model. Practically, it suggests that entrepreneurship education must simultaneously cultivate digital competence, psychological capital, and structured peer ecosystems to effectively stimulate entrepreneurial readiness.
Understanding Employee Acceptance of Algorithmic Leadership in Indonesia: Insights from Institutional Logic and Industry Type Yusmedi Nurfaizal; Agapito Barros
Journal of Leadership in Organizations Vol 8, No 1 (2026): Journal of Leadership in Organizations
Publisher : Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jlo.107734

Abstract

Introduction/Main Objectives: This study examines the impact of ethical decision-making by university leadership on academic freedom and institutional integrity in two Zimbabwean universities. Background/Problems: Empirical evidence on how ethical leadership in Zimbabwean higher education institutions manages the tension between academic freedom and institutional reputation remains limited. These challenges are intensified by limited resources, fragile governance frameworks, and significant government interference, which constrain institutional autonomy and complicate leadership decision-making. Novelty: This study introduces ethical leadership as a key analytical perspective for understanding the persistent yet understudied tension between academic freedom and institutional reputation in higher education institutions. Research Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used to explore ethical leadership in balancing academic freedom and institutional reputation. Qualitative data were collected through online interviews conducted via Zoom and Microsoft Teams with eight university leaders and twenty academics (four leaders and ten academics from each institution). In addition, a semi-structured questionnaire distributed through Google Forms gathered responses from 167 academics across the two universities. Finding/Results: The findings reveal substantial government interference affecting institutional decision-making, particularly in state universities. Foreign researchers working in Zimbabwean universities face greater restrictions than citizens and permanent residents. University leadership often prioritizes institutional reputation over academic freedom, limiting open communication and critical inquiry. The private university involved in the study also lacks formal policies protecting academic freedom. Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of ethical leadership and recommends clear ethical frameworks and leadership development programs to safeguard academic freedom while maintaining institutional integrity.
Co-Authors Ade Tuti Turistiati Agapito Barros Agapito Barros Dinar Mustofa Dola Innolda Fatki Sahida Feby Irawan Hartono Hartono Mugiarti Mugiarti Nadilla Al Azhar Nana Supriyana Retno Waluyo Reza Azizul Nasa Al Hakim Sakuri Sakuri Sri Radhika Wisnu Wardani Wiga Maulana Baihaqi Zaenal Khafidin