Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.041
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Tapis : Jurnal Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam Progresiva : Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Islam ADDIN Toleransi: Media Ilmiah komunikasi Umat Beragama Visipena Monas: Jurnal Inovasi Aparatur Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ushuluddin FENOMENA: Journal of Social Science Al'Adalah Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization International Journal of Religious and Interdisciplinary Studies
Muh Khamdan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Mainstreaming Religious Moderation in Facing the Shift of Terrorism Movement Patterns in Indonesia Khamdan, Muh; Umi Latifah; Mohd Syakir Mohd Rosdi; Naser Ali Abdulghani
International Journal of Religious and Interdisciplinary Studies Vol 1 No 2 (2024): September
Publisher : RaSAIL Media Group, Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64529/4km50n84

Abstract

This article discusses the role of religious moderation in dealing with the changing pattern of terrorism movements in Indonesia. Terrorism, which has been a serious threat since the 2002 Bali bombings, continues to evolve with increasingly complex movement patterns. The Government of Indonesia has taken steps to address it, including implementing the Terrorism Law, but challenges remain, especially regarding the often subjective definition of terrorism. This article aims to answer the question: How can religious moderation effectively deal with terrorism in Indonesia? This study uses qualitative methods and content analysis to analyze the synergy between the government and civil society, especially faith-based organizations such as Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah, in building community resilience against extremist ideologies. The study's findings suggest that the religious moderation approach, which involves cooperation between religious leaders and the government, can reduce the escalation of terrorism through a soft-power approach. The main scholarly contribution of this article is the emphasis on the importance of a more effective and sustainable approach to religious moderation in handling terrorism, as well as the need for synergy between the government and civil society actors in preventing radicalization at the grassroots level.
Penguatan Ekoteologi dan Konstruksi Perlindungan Hak Asasi Lingkungan Berbasis Tafsir Al-Qur’an Khamdan, Muh; Annibras, Nablur Rahman; Wiharyani, Wiharyani
Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Januari
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jpiu.32601

Abstract

This article aims to explain the construction of ecotheology from the perspective of contemporary interpreters based on comparison of contemporary interpretive texts. The creation of humans as caliphs on earth which has the meaning of being a substitute has experienced a shift in meaning in several contemporary interpretations. This theoretical study of environmental issues was studied using descriptive qualitative methods through interpretation results with plural dimensions. The data processing and analysis process is carried out using content analysis methods in thematic interpretation aspects related to environmental issues. A number of terms related to ecology in the Al-Qur'an show the relationship between human rights and environmental rights. Humans are ecologically part of the living environment, so the sustainability of human entities actually depends on environmental balance. The universe has a human right to be treated as well as possible as a life partner for humans to carry out their shared roles in serving God.
BOYCOTTING PRO-ISRAEL PRODUCTS: : Reinventing the Hadith of Tashabbuh in the Contemporary Era Khamdan, Muh; Ananda, Rifki Abror; Ibnu, Ibnu; Fata, Ahmad Khoirul
Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization
Publisher : ADP Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61680/jisc.v3i1.39

Abstract

The concept of tasyabbuh is often understood textually by some Muslim groups as a form of resemblance to other groups. This understanding triggers caution to avoid imitating the ways, products, or identities of non-Muslims. However, in an increasingly global cultural context, cross-cultural resemblance becomes inevitable. If not properly understood, the prohibition of tasyabbuh can create difficulties for Muslims themselves. In this context, applying the prohibition of tasyabbuh to the boycott movement of pro-Israel products may become a counterproductive action. This movement encourages the use of alternative products as a form of rejection towards Israel. Interestingly, the availability of these alternative products creates a need to resemble the very products being boycotted. This study uses a qualitative approach with critical discourse analysis methods. The findings reveal that the narrowing of the meaning of tasyabbuh in the context of legal prohibition often overlooks interpretations of cultural resemblance, including in product boycott actions. This article revisits the meaning of the tasyabbuh hadith and relates it to the phenomenon of the boycott of pro-Israel products in the contemporary era.
BOYCOTTING PRO-ISRAEL PRODUCTS: : Reinventing the Hadith of Tashabbuh in the Contemporary Era Khamdan, Muh; Ananda, Rifki Abror; Ibnu, Ibnu; Fata, Ahmad Khoirul
Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization
Publisher : ADP Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61680/jisc.v3i1.39

Abstract

The concept of tasyabbuh is often understood textually by some Muslim groups as a form of resemblance to other groups. This understanding triggers caution to avoid imitating the ways, products, or identities of non-Muslims. However, in an increasingly global cultural context, cross-cultural resemblance becomes inevitable. If not properly understood, the prohibition of tasyabbuh can create difficulties for Muslims themselves. In this context, applying the prohibition of tasyabbuh to the boycott movement of pro-Israel products may become a counterproductive action. This movement encourages the use of alternative products as a form of rejection towards Israel. Interestingly, the availability of these alternative products creates a need to resemble the very products being boycotted. This study uses a qualitative approach with critical discourse analysis methods. The findings reveal that the narrowing of the meaning of tasyabbuh in the context of legal prohibition often overlooks interpretations of cultural resemblance, including in product boycott actions. This article revisits the meaning of the tasyabbuh hadith and relates it to the phenomenon of the boycott of pro-Israel products in the contemporary era.
Reinterpreting Tasabbuh in the Context of the Boycott Movement Against Israeli-Linked Products: A Living Hadith Approach Khamdan, Muh; Mujib, Ahmad; Khusairi, Abdullah
International Journal of Religious and Interdisciplinary Studies Vol 2 No 2 (2025): September
Publisher : RaSAIL Media Group, Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64529/jx95rq91

Abstract

This study addresses a pressing contemporary issue in Muslim communities: the ethical and jurisprudential dilemma surrounding the boycott of products linked to Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories. While such boycotts—endorsed by fatwas like MUI No. 83/2023—are framed as acts of economic solidarity, a critical concern arises when Muslims produce alternative goods that resemble boycotted items: does this constitute tasabbuh (imitation of non-Muslims), which is prohibited in several hadiths? The research aims to reinterpret the classical concept of tasabbuh within the framework of a “living hadith” approach, examining whether functional imitation—without intent to emulate beliefs or identity—violates Islamic norms. Using a qualitative methodology, the study combines textual analysis of primary hadith sources (including Sunan Abi Dawud, Sahih al-Bukhari, and Musnad Ahmad) with empirical observation of Muslim consumer behavior and fatwa discourse in Indonesia. Findings reveal that tasabbuh is primarily defined by intention (niyyah) and context, not mere formal similarity. When imitation serves a legitimate purpose—such as resisting injustice, ensuring economic self-reliance, or fulfilling communal welfare—it falls outside the scope of prohibited tasabbuh. This reinterpretation aligns with higher objectives of Islamic law (maqāṣid al-sharīʿah) and classical legal maxims (qawāʿid fiqhiyyah), particularly the principle that “matters are judged by their intentions.” The study’s novelty lies in bridging textual hermeneutics with real-world activism, offering a nuanced ethical framework for Muslim economic resistance. It is recommended that Islamic institutions and scholars issue clearer guidelines distinguishing between prohibited cultural imitation and permissible functional replication, especially in contexts of political and economic justice. Such clarity can empower Muslim communities to engage in ethical consumerism without compromising religious identity.
Co-Authors Ahmad Khoirul Fata Ahmad Mujib, Ahmad Ananda, Rifki Abror Annibras, Nablur Rahman Arthur, Ryan Ibnu, Ibnu Kamaruzzaman, Kartini Khusairi, Abdullah Macpal, Sunandar Mohd Syakir Mohd Rosdi Nadiah Abidin Naser Ali Abdulghani Rini Setiawati Umi Latifah Wiharyani Wiharyani, Wiharyani