Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

An Analysis of Phonological Mistake in the YouTube “Vior dan Vincent Bertemu Satpam GI” on Raditya Dika Channel Tri Widarti, Diana; Martius, Martius; Fitriani, Rina; Sardila, Vera; Marlisa, Welli
Gurindam: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Vol 5, No 2 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/gjbs.v5i2.38737

Abstract

This study aims to describe the pronunciation mitake in Youtube “Vior dan Vincent Bertemu Satpam GI”. Data were collected using the listening and note-taking methods, then analyzed using insertion, deletion, and replacement techniques. Furthermore, the following conclusions were obtained: (1) mistake in the form of phoneme changes, consisting of (a) vowel pronunciation mistake, (b) consonant pronunciation mistakes, (2) mistake due to phoneme omissions consisting of (a) omission of the phoneme /h/ in the onsed and coda positions, (b) omission of the phoneme /s/ in the consoant cluster /ks/, and omission of the phoneme /k/ in the consonant cluster /ks/; (3) mistake in the form of added phonemes, namely the addition of the phoneme /n/ in the nucleus position of the word.
Beyond the Sacred “Peralihan” Ritual: Local Beliefs and Spiritual Negotiations in Malay-Islamic Culture Rehayati, Rina; Hasbi, M. Ridwan; Martius, Martius
ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 26 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/psfq0744

Abstract

This study challenges dominant perspectives that reduce Malay Muslim rites of passage to either residual traditions or fully Islamized practices. Focusing on communities in Siak and Palembang, it conceptualizes ritual as a dynamic arena of negotiation, where Islamic norms and local symbols are continuously reinterpreted rather than simply preserved or purified. Using ethnographic methods, the study demonstrates that practices such as tepung tawar, mandi limau, and doa selamat persist through processes of re-signification. Meanings once associated with magical protection are reframed within a tawhidic logic that shifts efficacy from objects to divine intention. This transformation is not merely theological but also social, as it redistributes authority among religious leaders, customary elites, and participants, producing a negotiated and embodied religiosity. The findings argue that Islamization operates not as a top-down imposition but as a dialogical process in which communities actively recalibrate the boundaries of the sacred. Ritual thus functions as a mediating mechanism that sustains cultural continuity, reinforces social cohesion, and secures religious legitimacy. By foregrounding this process, the study advances the concept of cultural piety, demonstrating that Malay Muslim religiosity is shaped through ongoing negotiation, where meaning remains fluid yet socially grounded.
Judicial Reasoning in Child Guardianship: Gender Justice and Maqāṣid Al-Sharī'ah in Indonesian Religious Courts Martius, Martius; Ash Shabah, Musyaffa Amin; Akbar, Azhar Muhamad; Che-umong, E-bat; Gustiana, Restia
Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 3 No 2 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52496/mjhki.v3i2.103

Abstract

Child guardianship (ḥaḍānah) in Islamic family law represents a critical mechanism for child protection during family dissolution, yet existing scholarship remains predominantly normative and fragmented, lacking longitudinal socio-legal analysis of judicial reasoning that integrates child protection and gender justice within Islamic legal frameworks. This study aims to analyze the transformation of child guardianship adjudication in Indonesian Religious Courts (Pengadilan Agama) during 2020–2025, focusing on judicial reasoning patterns, child welfare orientations, and the positioning of women's rights. Employing a normative-empirical (socio-legal) approach, this study analyzed 120 guardianship decisions retrieved from the Supreme Court Verdict Directory through qualitative content analysis and systematic coding, integrating three analytical frameworks: the best interest of the child, maqāṣid al-sharī'ah, and gender justice theory. The findings reveal a significant shift from textualist-normative reasoning toward discretionary, welfare-oriented adjudication, with judges increasingly prioritizing emotional stability, caregiving continuity, and socioeconomic conditions. A pronounced maternal preference pattern was identified, reflecting caregiving realities while simultaneously indicating latent gender bias. Women's rights were found to be implicitly integrated yet structurally subordinated within the best interest framework rather than recognized as autonomous legal principles. The COVID-19 pandemic additionally functioned as a structural catalyst accelerating guardianship litigation. This study contributes a longitudinal socio-legal framework that bridges maqāṣid al-sharī'ah with contemporary human rights discourse, while critically exposing the risks of unchecked judicial subjectivity. These findings underscore the urgent need for verdict standardization, explicit gender justice integration, and systematic reform of Islamic family law in Indonesia.