Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA MATERI FLUIDA STATIS DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PREDICT-OBSERVE-EXPLAIN SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF MEREMEDIASI MISKONSEPSI Putri Sarini; Kompyang Selamet
Jurnal IPA Terpadu Vol 6, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Jurnal IPA Terpadu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35580/ipaterpadu.v5i2.31289

Abstract

Miskonsepsi dapat menghambat proses pembelajaran. Guru perlu memahami miskonsepsi yang kerap terjadi pada suatu topik tertentu sehingga dapat membantu kemajuan belajar siswa. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis berbagai miskonsepsi siswa pada materi fluida statis dan menganalisis keefektifan model pembelajaran Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) dalam meremediasi miskonsepsi siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan literature review dengan cara menganalisis, mengidentifikasi, dan mensintesis sejumlah artikel ilmiah. Data penelitian ini terdiri dari 20 artikel ilmiah terpilih dalam rentang waktu 2003 – 2022. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa miskonsepsi siswa pada materi fluida statis terjadi pada tekanan hidrostatis, Prinsip Pascal, dan Prinsip Archimedes; dan model pembelajaran Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) efektif dalam meremediasi miskonsepsi siswa.
Problem Based Learning dan Discovery Learning: Komparasinya terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis pada Materi Sistem Pernapasan Ni Komang Ema Karistiawati; Kompyang Selamet; Putri Sarini
PendIPA Journal of Science Education Vol 8 No 1 (2024): February
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/pendipa.8.1.88-96

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the differences in critical thinking skills between students taught using the Problem Based Learning model and students taught using the Discovery Learning model. This research was type of quasi-experimental research, with a Pretest - Posttest Non Equivalent Control Group Design research design. The research sample was obtained from the entire population of class VIII students at SMP Negeri 1 Rendang, totaling 63 students using saturated sampling techniques. Data collection in this research was carried out using the test method. The data collection instrument used was a multiple choice test. The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive analysis techniques and t-test inferential statistical analysis. The results obtained in this research are as follows. (1) The t-test analysis shows the t value is 4,295 and the significance is less than 0.05 so the null hypothesis is rejected. This means that statistically there is a significant difference in critical thinking skills between students taught using the Problem Based Learning model and students taught using the Discovery Learning model. (2) Descriptively, the average critical thinking skills of experimental group I which used the Problem Based Learning model was 81, superior to experimental group II which used the Discovery Learning model with an average of 72. This shows that the evaluated comparison results of the Problem Based Learning model were superior to Discovery Learning model, especially on the Human Respiratory System material.  
Analysis of science learning motivation of class VIII students Santa Silveria Br Sembiring; Nia Erlina; Kompyang Selamet
JPPIPA (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya in collaboration with Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia (PPII)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jppipa.v10n2.p141-146

Abstract

This study analyzes the motivation to learn science and the supporting and inhibiting factors among grade VIII students at SMP Negeri 6 Sikur. This qualitative research employed a descriptive approach with purposive sampling, involving 33 students and one science teacher. The focus was on learning motivation and related factors. Data were collected through observation, questionnaires, interviews, and documentation, and analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s model, which includes data reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing. Data validity was ensured through technical triangulation, source triangulation, and member checking. Findings show that students’ motivation to learn science was generally low, with an average score of 49.35%. Factors influencing motivation included internal aspects such as aspirations, learning abilities, student conditions, and dynamic elements in learning, as well as external aspects like environmental conditions and teacher efforts in teaching.